Jump to content

Logos that look bad, but feel right


Recommended Posts

As iconic as it might be, the Lakers logo counts. It really needs to be cleaned up. Lines around the basketball except they stop a little short of the wordmark. The wordmark is different from the one used on the jerseys. I've seen some concepts that make the lines a little cleaner and use the jersey wordmark and I think it's a big improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/23/2021 at 12:56 PM, SilverBullet1929 said:

19 *more* hidden images in sports logos you won't be able to unsee | For  The Win

 

Abstract 1970s French Canadian art as logos feels as on brand for Montreal as black and gold does for Pittsburgh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/26/2021 at 3:17 PM, DTConcepts said:

Maybe it's my 6th grade mind, but this logo always looked like a dick to me.

 

You may want to see a doctor about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2021 at 7:35 AM, gimmick said:

spacer.png

 

Cubs logo is bad for two reasons:

 

1) that giant TM in there.  Why do they need that in their on-jersey logo but other teams don't?  Is it because it's literally their full logo and not a wordmark like the other teams use?

 

2) The thick outer blue circle is way too thick and unnecessary.  Would look better if it was half the width.  Maybe a little thicker than back in the day, but half as much as now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/25/2021 at 3:12 PM, Eastport76 said:

Does this count?

spacer.png

 

It has sentimental value for the Cups, but it's just a recycling of elements from very dated late 90s identity.  The Reverse Retro kind of illustrates the need for a change.

 

On 4/25/2021 at 4:07 PM, Quillz said:

As iconic as it might be, the Lakers logo counts. It really needs to be cleaned up. Lines around the basketball except they stop a little short of the wordmark. The wordmark is different from the one used on the jerseys. I've seen some concepts that make the lines a little cleaner and use the jersey wordmark and I think it's a big improvement.

This and that it has black thrown in which is completely unnecessary.  Also, the "Los Angeles" font is awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, LMU said:

This and that it has black thrown in which is completely unnecessary.  Also, the "Los Angeles" font is awful.

I remember when the Vikings debuted their new logo. It was kind of what I'm thinking the Lakers should do. Cleaner lines, tightened it up a bit, but very recognizable. To the point most people probably didn't notice a major change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/29/2021 at 11:33 AM, burgundy said:

 

That really is a terrible logo, but it's also on my favorite Tigers shirt.

 

Ahhhhh...it's hurting my eyes......LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/2/2021 at 7:04 PM, BBTV said:

Cubs logo is bad for two reasons:

 

1) that giant TM in there.  Why do they need that in their on-jersey logo but other teams don't?  Is it because it's literally their full logo and not a wordmark like the other teams use?

Technically, the on-jersey version uses a (R), not a TM, but that's basically a distinction without much difference, topically.  Very odd though, considering the White Sox, Rays, Braves, and other teams who literally use their full logo as their home script don't do this.

p74wradrjjg7dzyhdnul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.