Quillz Posted April 25, 2021 Share Posted April 25, 2021 As iconic as it might be, the Lakers logo counts. It really needs to be cleaned up. Lines around the basketball except they stop a little short of the wordmark. The wordmark is different from the one used on the jerseys. I've seen some concepts that make the lines a little cleaner and use the jersey wordmark and I think it's a big improvement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MilSox Posted April 25, 2021 Share Posted April 25, 2021 On 4/23/2021 at 12:56 PM, SilverBullet1929 said: Abstract 1970s French Canadian art as logos feels as on brand for Montreal as black and gold does for Pittsburgh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerseyJimmy Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 On 4/23/2021 at 7:30 AM, EddieJ1984 said: No this logo is just crap, no one misses it. I miss the old wizards logo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTConcepts Posted April 26, 2021 Author Share Posted April 26, 2021 On 4/23/2021 at 11:56 AM, SilverBullet1929 said: Maybe it's my 6th grade mind, but this logo always looked like a dick to me. "You ain't gonna learn what you don't wanna know..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Germanshepherd Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 That’s one ed up dick i have unquantifiable corpses on my conscience Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spartacat_12 Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 On 4/26/2021 at 3:17 PM, DTConcepts said: Maybe it's my 6th grade mind, but this logo always looked like a dick to me. You may want to see a doctor about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadSeed84 Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 On 4/26/2021 at 3:17 PM, DTConcepts said: Maybe it's my 6th grade mind, but this logo always looked like a dick to me. Maybe after Lorena Bobbitt was done with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadSeed84 Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burgundy Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 1 hour ago, EddieJ1984 said: That really is a terrible logo, but it's also on my favorite Tigers shirt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gimmick Posted May 1, 2021 Share Posted May 1, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MilSox Posted May 1, 2021 Share Posted May 1, 2021 You could call the Cubs logo bland and generic by modern standards, but I'd hardly call it "bad." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ark Posted May 2, 2021 Share Posted May 2, 2021 The Expos logo is the only one I agree with being both bad and feeling right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alecgoff Posted May 2, 2021 Share Posted May 2, 2021 We literally call this the "flying Elvis," but still it seems very right... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted May 2, 2021 Share Posted May 2, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted May 3, 2021 Share Posted May 3, 2021 On 5/1/2021 at 7:35 AM, gimmick said: Cubs logo is bad for two reasons: 1) that giant TM in there. Why do they need that in their on-jersey logo but other teams don't? Is it because it's literally their full logo and not a wordmark like the other teams use? 2) The thick outer blue circle is way too thick and unnecessary. Would look better if it was half the width. Maybe a little thicker than back in the day, but half as much as now. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMU Posted May 3, 2021 Share Posted May 3, 2021 On 4/25/2021 at 3:12 PM, Eastport76 said: Does this count? It has sentimental value for the Cups, but it's just a recycling of elements from very dated late 90s identity. The Reverse Retro kind of illustrates the need for a change. On 4/25/2021 at 4:07 PM, Quillz said: As iconic as it might be, the Lakers logo counts. It really needs to be cleaned up. Lines around the basketball except they stop a little short of the wordmark. The wordmark is different from the one used on the jerseys. I've seen some concepts that make the lines a little cleaner and use the jersey wordmark and I think it's a big improvement. This and that it has black thrown in which is completely unnecessary. Also, the "Los Angeles" font is awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quillz Posted May 3, 2021 Share Posted May 3, 2021 31 minutes ago, LMU said: This and that it has black thrown in which is completely unnecessary. Also, the "Los Angeles" font is awful. I remember when the Vikings debuted their new logo. It was kind of what I'm thinking the Lakers should do. Cleaner lines, tightened it up a bit, but very recognizable. To the point most people probably didn't notice a major change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EJ_Barlik Posted May 3, 2021 Share Posted May 3, 2021 On 4/29/2021 at 11:33 AM, burgundy said: That really is a terrible logo, but it's also on my favorite Tigers shirt. Ahhhhh...it's hurting my eyes......LOL 5-time Defending NL East Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Echo Posted May 4, 2021 Share Posted May 4, 2021 On 4/29/2021 at 10:17 AM, EddieJ1984 said: It looks like he just stepped on a Lego. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Discrim Posted May 4, 2021 Share Posted May 4, 2021 On 5/2/2021 at 7:04 PM, BBTV said: Cubs logo is bad for two reasons: 1) that giant TM in there. Why do they need that in their on-jersey logo but other teams don't? Is it because it's literally their full logo and not a wordmark like the other teams use? Technically, the on-jersey version uses a (R), not a TM, but that's basically a distinction without much difference, topically. Very odd though, considering the White Sox, Rays, Braves, and other teams who literally use their full logo as their home script don't do this. EDIT: looks like the Cubs have been doing this ever since they last tweaked the C-ubs logo back in '79. Compare 1978...no (R) mark 1979...it's not as obvious as on the modern jersey, and I can't tell if it's an (R) or a TM, but it's there. A strong mind gets high off success, a weak mind gets high off bull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.