DNAsports

NFL Number Changes 2021

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, DNAsports said:

 

Vikings Rookie OL Christian Darrisaw

spacer.png
 

Packers Rookie CB Eric Stokes

spacer.png

 

Packers Rookie OL Josh Myers

spacer.png
 

Packers Rookie WR Amari Rodgers

spacer.png

 

 

 

 

Amari Rodgers should be #13 to make his jersey look as similar to Aaron’s jersey as possible just to irritate opponents. I’m sure Allen Lazard would give up his digits for such a noble cause. 
 

Also, if Aaron somehow forces his way out, change it to #12. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The “get off my lawn” crowd out in force... There’s really not an argument besides “tradition” to keep the old system. Players are becoming so much more hybridized than they ever have in the past, sometimes seems hard to give them set in stone positions/positional numbers. On top of that, I would assume a lot of these guys have personal connections to their numbers, probably the same one worn in high school, which is the same one they wore in college. If I somehow made it through the entire journey to the NFL wearing 7 as a receiver, against all odds and with all these obstacles, I’d want to keep wearing it. I get why they’d want to keep it instead of wearing 84 cause some other guy did 30 years ago. Maybe I’m just younger, maybe it’s cause I watch more college football than others. Either way, looks like it’s a hit and not changing back anytime soon! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sleuthpanther said:

There’s really not an argument besides “tradition” to keep the old system

 

Yeah there is, I prefer the aesthetics of the old system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/tom-brady-doesnt-sound-too-happy-about-the-nfls-decision-to-change-the-rule-for-jersey-numbers/ - Say what you will about Mr. Tom Brady, but I do agree with him on the new numbering system. He's got a vaild point about being able to tell which position is which - IMO, a good reason to keep the numbering system in place from 1973-2020.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fields wears, as expected 1, or as it will look on the Bears jersey, |.  

 

YnOD3or.gif

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, MCM0313 said:

Amari Rodgers should be #13 to make his jersey look as similar to Aaron’s jersey as possible just to irritate opponents.

 

How would that irritate opponents?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, BBTV said:
On 4/30/2021 at 8:48 PM, BBTV said:

Davonta Smith will be the first single-digit receiver in Eagles modern history.  Dislike. 

 

E0Q0R65WEAYKyeH?format=jpg&name=4096x409

The single-digit WR has precedent, but just in preseason.

 

1bfcfc48-54a9-49c8-996b-8d4b3614eebf-dea dm_190815_NFL_EAGLES_THORSON_TO_WARD_38_

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The more I think about it, the more I like the idea of LBs wearing 10-19. I hope Micah Parsons keeps 11 for the Cowboys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fanatics seems to have a few more 1st rounders, and Etienne held up a #1 in his press conference w/ Lawrence's 16...

ff_4301167-b3852ac7e8e41e9a666d_full.jpgGregory Rousseau Buffalo Bills Nike 2021 NFL Draft First Round Pick Game Jersey - Royalff_4301262-41cfee758d8031f0249f_full.jpgNajee Harris Pittsburgh Steelers Nike 2021 NFL Draft First Round Pick Game Jersey - BlackTrey Lance San Francisco 49ers Nike 2021 NFL Draft First Round Pick Game Jersey - Scarlet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never understood why numbers were restricted in the first place. It's like if left fielders were only allowed to wear 50-59, or if point guards were the only players who could wear 1-19.

 

There was a conversation on here a few days ago about rules that are based entirely on "it's always been that way" and nothing else - this is a prime example of that. There's no other justification.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The now-old number rule also helps when teaching the game to people who are completely unfamiliar to it.  They could turn on a game and be like "oh, the guys in 80s are the WRs, the guy in 20 must be a RB, so it's weird that he's spread out" or something like that.  "The guys in 50s are the LBs and one was trying to cover a guy wearing 88 so that's a bad thing."

 

It's nothing at all like telling left fielders they can only wear certain numbers because baseball players aren't anywhere close to each other on the field and it's usually pretty obvious what position a guy is playing unless there's an infield shift, and that usually only lasts a play or two.  When numbers were introduced, they tended to correspond with the player's position in the lineup, which (I guess) helped the umpires, hence Babe Ruth wearing 3 and Lou Gehrig wearing 4.  So there was some logic there.

 

I don't watch hockey anymore but I imagine it's still pretty odd to see a goalie not wearing 1 or 30 something, and defensemen in single digits.  While not legislated, it's still an established norm (at least as of the last time I paid attention.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DNAsports said:

Eagles CB Darius Slay switching from 24 to 2

spacer.png

 

He plays like it so he might as well wear it.  One of the more overrated/overhyped CBs in the league.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There’s a weird rule in basketball below the pro level where a player can’t wear 6, 7, 8, or 9 because they could be interpreted as 51, 52, 53, or 54 when a referee calls fouls

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, DNAsports said:


 

Eagles CB Darius Slay switching from 24 to 2

spacer.png

Absolutely awful

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, MCM0313 said:

Packers Rookie WR Amari Rodgers

 

E0RyIaVWYAA1xbB?format=jpg&name=large

 

What a fxcking troll job by the Pack -- drafting "A.Rodgers" and giving him Aaron's college number

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, DNAsports said:

There’s a weird rule in basketball below the pro level where a player can’t wear 6, 7, 8, or 9 because they could be interpreted as 51, 52, 53, or 54 when a referee calls fouls

Some insight on the NCAA's reasoning.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, DNAsports said:

Rams Rookie RB Jake Funk

spacer.png

 

Dude looks like the jacked-up spawn of Kato Kaelin and Cindy Crawford.

 

Also, that 4 is atrocious. (I know it's a mockup, but still...)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean to make a counterargument, these kids have zero restriction on numbers growing up, they can pick a number at age 7 and run with it for their entire lives, they get to the pinnacle and are forced to choose one in a select range because "it's been that way?" I love they have more freedom in number selection.

 

Also think of the very casual fans, if a player can keep their number college to pros... (Oh that #1 from LSU is really good, he's #1 on the Bengals now). Probably helps them out a bit.

 

By the end of the season it's going to look completely normal, it only looks wrong now because it changed. Like how kickoffs were moved forward and featured no run-ups, it looked way wrong the first few times, but looks like standard practice now.

 

It sounds like I'm in the minority on these boards, but I do really like the number freedom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.