tBBP Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 1 minute ago, DC in Da House w/o a Doubt said: I think you've nailed it. I can see them trying to somehow tie that in to "fight for Old DC", as well. It'll be hokey as all get-out, but I can completely see it. 3 Quote *Disclaimer: I am not an authoritative expert on stuff...I just do a lot of reading and research and keep in close connect with a bunch of people who are authoritative experts on stuff. || dribbble || Behance || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AgentColon2 Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 Hokey is Nike’s specialty. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCarp1231 Posted January 4, 2022 Author Share Posted January 4, 2022 Are we not going to talk about the possibility of the team having two monochrome (all burgundy & all white) uniforms without the chance for interchangeability? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM0313 Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 15 minutes ago, ManillaToad said: I thought they couldn't secure the trademark rights to WFT because it was too generic We can only hope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moseph Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 Well this looks like it is going to be terrible and such a let down. The burgundy jersey in the video looks like it would be a nice alternate or color rush to their current look but isn't as good as the current look. The only good news is they might be keeping the Washington Football Team name, but if thats the case they should've just stuck with the current classic uniforms and added the W and some stripes to the helmet 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManillaToad Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 I would take a garbage non-plural nickname like Armada over a lifetime of "We're playing the Team this week xD" jokes 16 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gosioux76 Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 45 minutes ago, ManillaToad said: I thought they couldn't secure the trademark rights to WFT because it was too generic If that's true, then I'd think that would be an even stronger reason for keeping WFT around. If they can't secure trademark rights on those grounds, then nobody else could either, so no threat of legal entanglements. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramsjetsthunder Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 2 hours ago, Bill0813 said: That is beautiful 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceCap Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 So first off...everyone trying to get logos out of reflections in windows and helmet cases...y'all need to calm down Secondly...it sucks it won't be Redwolves or Red Wolves. That was my choice, and I even like the concept logo for it everyone seems to be crapping on. As for what we're seeing uniform wise...they're giving us snippets. I've seen enough "snippet reveals" from teams to know that you can't really extrapolate anything from them. There's some stuff that I think looks good, some stuff I'm unsure about...we just have to wait and see. I'm not excited about any of the potential names though, or Admirals. 10 Quote PotD 26/2/12 1/7/15 2020 BASS Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal Regular Season Champion 2021 BASS NFL Pick'em Regular Season Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM0313 Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 Warthogs isn’t a common team name, has a great feel to it, and would open up numerous design possibilities - tusked helmets, off the top of my head. They could even get downhearted every time they farted! (But seriously, Disney can’t own a species; just don’t make the mascot look like Pumbaa and you’re good.) 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSU151 Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 29 minutes ago, gosioux76 said: If that's true, then I'd think that would be an even stronger reason for keeping WFT around. If they can't secure trademark rights on those grounds, then nobody else could either, so no threat of legal entanglements. Might want to rethink this one. Teams want trademark rights and want to protect their IP for a reason. 8 Quote Smart is believing half of what you hear. Genius is knowing which half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ssj_homeslice Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 re: Admirals, i seriously doubt the Team is going to name itself after an extinct NFL Europe franchise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilbert Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 54 minutes ago, ssj_homeslice said: re: Admirals, i seriously doubt the Team is going to name itself after an extinct NFL Europe franchise Why not? The Texans, Bengals, Bills and Colts are all named after previous teams before them. The Steelers (then as the Pirates), Washington (then as the Boston Braves), the Cardinals (then as the St Louis Cardinals) and the New York Giants all once operated alongside MLB teams with the same name. I seriously doubt the league and team wouldnt have an issue using the name of a defunct team. 5 Quote Signature intentionally left blank Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AgentColon2 Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 1 hour ago, MCM0313 said: Warthogs isn’t a common team name, has a great feel to it, and would open up numerous design possibilities - tusked helmets, off the top of my head. They could even get downhearted every time they farted! (But seriously, Disney can’t own a species; just don’t make the mascot look like Pumbaa and you’re good.) UFL had a Tuskers team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigers Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 I really hope it's what they have now just to mess with people. 5 Quote Logano wins BOWL before Chargers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM0313 Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 12 minutes ago, Dilbert said: Why not? The Texans, Bengals, Bills and Colts are all named after previous teams before them. The Steelers (then as the Pirates), Washington (then as the Boston Braves), the Cardinals (then as the St Louis Cardinals) and the New York Giants all once operated alongside MLB teams with the same name. I seriously doubt the league and team wouldnt have an issue using the name of a defunct team. Heck, the Cleveland Browns aren’t even the first Browns in pro sports - the American League had a St. Louis Browns 40 years before them, and those Browns were, themselves, named after the St. Louis Brown Stockings from the 1880s (who, themselves, became the Cardinals IIRC). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Decent mockups based off today's leaks: 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dont care Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 2 hours ago, DCarp1231 said: Are we not going to talk about the possibility of the team having two monochrome (all burgundy & all white) uniforms without the chance for interchangeability? Why wouldn’t they be interchangeable? Especially if they are solid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4_tattoos Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 1 hour ago, MCM0313 said: Warthogs isn’t a common team name, has a great feel to it, and would open up numerous design possibilities - tusked helmets, off the top of my head. They could even get downhearted every time they farted! (But seriously, Disney can’t own a species; just don’t make the mascot look like Pumbaa and you’re good.) This was a thing Washington Warthogs - Wikipedia 7 Quote Hotter Than July > Thriller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krz Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Don’t go reading into those logos in the video. Most of them are fan submitted and I doubt they would use any. The even had been showing some submissions on their website the last few months. Quote Excellent! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.