simpsontide Posted December 17, 2004 Share Posted December 17, 2004 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Discrim Posted December 17, 2004 Share Posted December 17, 2004 odd, never seen that. A strong mind gets high off success, a weak mind gets high off bull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puckguy14 Posted December 17, 2004 Share Posted December 17, 2004 It's not a new A's logo. The "A's Brand" was a marketing scheme from this past season. Note that the A is very similar to the A on the caps, not the official primary logo itself. 2004 San Jose Sharks 7th Man Fan of the Year San Jose Gold Miners - 4x Lombardi Cup Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEAD! Posted December 17, 2004 Share Posted December 17, 2004 That's probably just an advertising tool I saw, I came, I left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davey Posted December 17, 2004 Share Posted December 17, 2004 That logo is on their site , if your woundering where you can see it ur self. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted December 17, 2004 Share Posted December 17, 2004 It's not a new A's logo. The "A's Brand" was a marketing scheme from this past season. Note that the A is very similar to the A on the caps, not the official primary logo itself. Actually Puck, according to Chris' site, that logo is niether the one on the caps or in the primary.It is from their old set of logos...which is weird. JUSTIN STRIEBEL | PORTFOLIO | RESUME | CONTACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyRock Posted December 18, 2004 Share Posted December 18, 2004 I don't think he meant that the A from A's Brand was an actual logo, just that it looks close to one. A few of team's websites have some unique marketing tool or alternate logo they don't actually use on any part of a current uniform. The White Sox, for example, have a logo that says "Sox Pride" on their website. New York Jets |3-3| First, AFC EastNew York Mets |74-88| Fourth, NL EastNew York Islanders|34-37-11| Fifth, Atlantic DivisionNew Orleans Hornets |21-45| Third, Southwest Division Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f-ing palko Posted December 19, 2004 Share Posted December 19, 2004 Does anyone remember the A's TATC logo? It was sort of 3-d, actually it was the only TATC logo that was actually worth looking at... i wouldnt mind seeing that as an alt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f-ing palko Posted December 20, 2004 Share Posted December 20, 2004 Found the A's TATC hat. I think it's pretty good, certainly the best of all the TATC sillyness. it would make a better alt then those black alts they had for a while, which were awful.A's TATC cap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puckguy14 Posted December 20, 2004 Share Posted December 20, 2004 Glad to see everyone paid attention to me. A's Brand was an ad campaign for the A's this past year. It's not a new logo. In fact they several variations in their TV and print ads this year. Anyways to point out about the cap...The logo on the cap doesn't match the one on CC's site. 2004 San Jose Sharks 7th Man Fan of the Year San Jose Gold Miners - 4x Lombardi Cup Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted January 2, 2005 Share Posted January 2, 2005 i know robert buan, who is the post game announcer for the A's. he says it was just designed as advertising for the team. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEAD! Posted January 2, 2005 Share Posted January 2, 2005 I've been pondering about this question: Who thinks that the Athletics should just go with the 'A' on their caps? I saw, I came, I left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wheateater Posted January 2, 2005 Share Posted January 2, 2005 I've been pndering about this question: Who thinks that the Athletics should just go with the 'A' on their caps? Well, since they're known more commonly as "the A's" than "the Athletics," I think sticking with the apostrophe and 's' is a good idea. Otherwise, greenhorn logo fans might confuse it for Atlanta or Anaheim....if they're unintelligent. I dunno. I just think I like the "A's" on the cap. Looks dignified and traditional...and I like that. Wagner Athletic Group11-2 Saskatoon Steeds (WAFL)-NFL-2014 Western Conference Champions / 8-5 Calgary Pronghorns (TNFF)-CFL-2014 Confederation Cup XI Champions14-6-2 Saskatoon Yellowheads (XHL)-NHL-1st, Gretzky Conference / 5-4-0 Saskatoon Czars (MLH)-AHL-T2nd, Calder Conference7-1-6 VfL Dortmund (Weltliga)-Bundesliga-3rd, League / 5-1-5 West End AFC (WFL)-EPL-T5th, League14-7 Saskatoon Sheiks (AA)-MLB-2014 Founder's Cup Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted January 2, 2005 Share Posted January 2, 2005 Back to the TACT talk...the Cards' probably were the best looking of the bunch to be honest and homerish. JUSTIN STRIEBEL | PORTFOLIO | RESUME | CONTACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockchalk Posted January 3, 2005 Share Posted January 3, 2005 Correct me if i'm wrong, but wasn't the Cards pretty much exactly the same thing, just made to fit on the sleeveless jersey? I've decided to give up hope for all sports teams I follow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.