November Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Here's the new World Seires Logo. I like the new design alot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBGKon Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 nice logo.....very nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slickster Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Bravo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xnylived Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 it's a good logo but whoever designed it must be color blind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pharos04 Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 definitely falls under the "interesting " catagory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyRock Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 I like it - this new style of logo they adopted in 2004 works pretty well... except for one thing. In 2004, did it bother anyone else that the Red Sox "B" was placed where it was... kinda in the upper left?IMO, the perfect place for the champions' logo this year would be directly to the left of the wordmark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC97 Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Not a fan of this 2005 logoI miss the 92-97 one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markanthony Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 The ball threads separating is very catchy. Although, the green/maroon combination is a little out-there. Overall, NIce design. I like it. I Like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Maybe it would be better with better colors but I dont like its another miss for teh World Series who have had just 1 good logo since 1997. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slapshot Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Hasn't the marriage of Nike and West Virginia football taught us anything? Digital Sans is not the best looking font. It definitely stands out, but so does Hobo.I think the designers are getting a little lazy again (see World Series logos from the 90s). At least last year's colors were nore neutral. This looks like it's trying to please the Mariners, Astros and Padres fans all at the same time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kc51design Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 IMO the seams should make the same pattern on the left side as on the right... but then that would probably required the wordmark to be centered too. Apart from weird colors, the logo looks to static for me, lacks some creativity, I liked the early 2000's logo the best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Braden Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 That logo is absolutely hideous. I don't know how any of you like it.What a bad use of those colours... plus what's with the woodmark tabbed over to the right like that?The idea with the world and the baseball is cute, but it comes with horrible execution. They really destroyed the classic World Series logos of the 90's and have turned them into trash. Complete utter trash.Every top-tier designer here could design better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesjduncan Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Not a fan of this 2005 logoI miss the 92-97 one I'm with you, man. I'm not really into this futuristic look. The cursive logo was nicer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grandmaster C Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 I like it. Other than the bass ackwards colours on the MLB logo, it looks good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cuss16 Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 I don't really like this, it just doesn't have the grand look a world series logo is suppose to have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEAD! Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Not a fan of this 2005 logoI miss the 92-97 one I miss it too.... The '05 one just looks too minor league.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BallWonk Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 What on earth is going on with those seams? That's just terrible. What is it supposed to communicate? That the earth is pinned against the left side of an invisible glass baseball? Is this some metaphysical contemplation of the nature of seams? It's like a bad undergraduate attempt at deconstructivist mimicry: "Knock the Cover Off the Ball: Toward a Derridaian Reimagining of Seams as Seams."It's just freakish and ugly. Also, there is a good readon why the MLB logo is supposed to have the blue on the left and red on the right. Putting the brighter color in the larger space completely imbalances the thing. Makes me wish baseball would do like the World Cup and base its World Series logo on the shape of the trophy itself. Say, anyone have a vector image of the World Series trophy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HurricaneDavid Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Not a fan of this 2005 logoI miss the 92-97 one I agree 100%. The mid-90s logo was the best ever... as was World Series Baseball for Sega. The colors on this new one are Octobery and Autumnal, but they don't fit the tradition of the event. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HurricaneDavid Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 This is also going to be one awkward looking sleeve patch, what with the overall shape and the seams on the globe... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMMF Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Not a fan of this 2005 logoI miss the 92-97 one This?You think that one is better than 2005's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.