patsox Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 Enjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breakwood Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 ? what does that have to do with the city, Are you saying foxboro is the best sports city? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patsox Posted February 1, 2005 Author Share Posted February 1, 2005 sorry, I just wrote the wrong title Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 No problem I as moderator can change the topic. www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patsox Posted February 1, 2005 Author Share Posted February 1, 2005 thanks pal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportsfan331 Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 i think so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 Well if the Cowboys of the 90s are considered a dyansty for 3 in 4 so would the Pats. www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkrdevil Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 Look again in 10 years. Right now I think missing the playoffs the year after Super Bowl XXXVI hurts. Had they made the playoffs that year then yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breakwood Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 I dunno bout this year but if they three-peat there will be no doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patsox Posted February 1, 2005 Author Share Posted February 1, 2005 how do you make a signature? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronChefShark Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 ah SHADDUP! US state flag concepts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 how do you make a signature? Patssox theres a thread in the sportlogos section Frequentally asked questions check that out before asking any.FAQ www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
See Red Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 The Patriots are, without a doubt, a dynasty. 31-2 in their last 33 (or is it 32-2 in their last 34, now?)... you won't see dominance like that very often. Especially in this era of Free Agency when you see really good teams miss the playoffs the next year, and really bad teams make them. Consistency alone makes it a huge accomplishment. They missed the playoffs one year, but it's not like they finished under .500 or missed it by a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cartabago Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 I thought dynasties were consecutive superbowl wins, without break years. :\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slapshot Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 Bill Belichick was asked that last week after the Pittsburgh game. His response?"A dynasty is when you win 3 Super Bowls in 4 years."If the Pats win, it's a dynasty. Back-to-Back Fatal Forty Champion 2015 & 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
See Red Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 I thought dynasties were consecutive superbowl wins, without break years. :\ It depends on who you ask. But generally, back to back Super Bowls aen't considered a dynasty as the Denver Broncos teams that won back to back Super Bowls aren't considered a dynasty.To me, it's dominance over an extended period of time (4 years +), and 3 Super Bowls in 4 years fits the description to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stampman Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 To me a dynasty is something that doesn't happen all the time, and the minimum requirement in my books is 3 championships in a row--so if they can do that--I would say yes--until then a semi dynasty.Edmonton Oiler fans don't like this as it eliminates their team from being one too--but that's how I see it--and it makes dynasties rarer & sweeter...(For example--the NHL in all its history would then have 4 teams qualify-or 3 teams --one twice.) Comic Sans walks into a bar, and the bartender says, "Sorry, we don't serve your type here." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
See Red Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 So to you, the NFL has never had a dynasty? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 thats ridiculous, thats like saying the 9ers werent a dynasty because they didnt win 3 in a row.A dynasty is a team that dominates in an era. 3 Super Bowls in 4 years especially in this era of free agency would be considered a dynasty in my books Proud owner of the Utah Pioneers of the Continnental Baseball League.PACKER BACKER FOREVER! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yh Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 thats ridiculous, thats like saying the 9ers werent a dynasty because they didnt win 3 in a row.A dynasty is a team that dominates in an era. 3 Super Bowls in 4 years especially in this era of free agency would be considered a dynasty in my books Can't say it much better myself.The Steelers of the 70's winning 4 Super Bowls in 6 years was a dynasty. The 49ers winning 4 Super Bowls in 9 years was a dynasty.The Cowboys winning 3 Super Bowls in 4 years was a dynasty.Keep in mind, you don't just look at Super Bowls won but also whether the team is a legitimate Super Bowl contender and playoff participant in the years when they don't win it all. You need championships to be a dynasty but you don't need them every single year - just having the talent and recognized ability to win it all also counts in the picture as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.