Roger Clemente Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 Because it's gotta sound feminine, how about "The Pissed-Off Octopussies of Chicago"?--Roger "Time?" Clemente. Follow me on Twitter if you care: @Animal_Clans.My opinion may or may not be the same as yours. The choice is up to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yh Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 They moved from Newark? They couldn't stand to compete with the ABA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwabel Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 Look at part of their business plan. Destined to fail!http://www.suntimes.com/output/basketball/...spt-wnba09.htmlHow much are tickets, and when are they available? Seats in the lower bowl at the UIC Pavilion are $35 each and in the upper bowl $22.50 and $10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shizznick Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 The Chicago Bull Dy.... Naw, that's too easy. realclearpolitics.com "Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire." - Robert A. Heinlein Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian in Boston Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 I've always wondered that if the WNBA expanded enough if they would put a team in Boston. and since they try to go with the NBA team's theme, would they be the Boston Druids? No. A Boston-based WNBA franchise - that is trying to play off of the Celtics branding - should be named the Boston Banshees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian in Boston Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 I'd go with the Chicago Zephyrs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanB06 Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 That won't happen, though, because the Celtics' ownership is on record as having no interest in the WNBA.$35 for a good seat is probably cheap for the WNBA. The Connecticut Sun, for example, charge $100 for courtside seats and $50 for the first few rows of the lower bowl of Mohegan Sun Arena. Everywhere else in the lower bowl is $30 except on the baselines, where it's $20. (Info from the Sun Web site.)Chicago was one of the few good draws in the ABL, as previously noted. Why not in the WNBA? If there's a quality product on the court, the people will come see it. Â Sodboy13 said: As you watch more basketball, you will learn to appreciate the difference between "defense" and "couldn't find the rim with a pair of bloodhounds and a Garmin." meet the new page, not the same as the old page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian in Boston Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 That won't happen, though, because the Celtics' ownership is on record as having no interest in the WNBA. Ah... but an independent ownership group could set up shop somewhere in the city, including the Fleet Center (after all, Jeremy Jacobs wouldn't be adverse to making a few bucks off of a summer tenant). Honestly, I don't see it happening either. However, the league does seem to be embracing independent ownership more and more. Plus, Banshees would be a pretty cool name to tie-in the WNBA franchise's identity to that of the Celtics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tannerman Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 We don't want a WNBA team. But now we got one. Let it fail. I'll just enjoy my Arena Football, thank you very much. Olympic Broadcaster Logos - BevReview.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanB06 Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 That won't happen, though, because the Celtics' ownership is on record as having no interest in the WNBA. Ah... but an independent ownership group could set up shop somewhere in the city, including the Fleet Center (after all, Jeremy Jacobs wouldn't be adverse to making a few bucks off of a summer tenant). Honestly, I don't see it happening either. However, the league does seem to be embracing independent ownership more and more. Plus, Banshees would be a pretty cool name to tie-in the WNBA franchise's identity to that of the Celtics. But if for any reason the Fleet is out of play (Jacobs wants too much for rent, too much of a cut on concessions and parking, etc.), where would this conjectural Boston team play? Do they really want to play at BU? Northeastern? BC? IMO, none of those three options are palatable alternatives in the event Jacobs won't play ball (no pun intended), though BU would be the least undesirable of the three (at least they've got a new arena there).This is sort of why I'm happy Chicago is going the college gym route instead of going full-bore for the United Center: the UC is too big for a startup WNBA team. I'd even go so far as to say it wouldn't be a good arena for an established team - the average WNBA crowd wouldn't even half-fill the joint.Just out of curiosity, was there any effort to secure the Rosemont Horizon (I think it's Allstate Arena now, don't quote me on that) as the venue? The place holds about 10,000, no? Â Sodboy13 said: As you watch more basketball, you will learn to appreciate the difference between "defense" and "couldn't find the rim with a pair of bloodhounds and a Garmin." meet the new page, not the same as the old page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanB06 Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 We don't want a WNBA team. But now we got one. Let it fail. I'll just enjoy my Arena Football, thank you very much. Well, if there enough people like you with that attitude, the team just might. Â Sodboy13 said: As you watch more basketball, you will learn to appreciate the difference between "defense" and "couldn't find the rim with a pair of bloodhounds and a Garmin." meet the new page, not the same as the old page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEWJ Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 the ABL was from 1996-1999 |Â BROWNS | BUCKEYES | CAVALIERS | INDIANSÂ | Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thad Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 What about the Chicago Cows?(it goes w/ the Bulls like many of the WNBA teams do...)what a logo that would be Life is 10% what happens to you and 90% about how you react to it.App State Mountaineers / Alabama Crimson Tide / Atlanta Braves / New York Jets / Atlanta Hawks "If you believe in yourself and have dedication and pride - and never quit, you'll be a winner. The price of victory is high but so are the rewards." [Bear Bryant]Redmond Rampage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian in Boston Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 Do they really want to play at BU? Northeastern? BC? IMO, none of those three options are palatable alternatives in the event Jacobs won't play ball (no pun intended), though BU would be the least undesirable of the three (at least they've got a new arena there).This is sort of why I'm happy Chicago is going the college gym route instead of going full-bore for the United Center...So, let me see if I get this straight: You're "happy" that the WNBA's new Chicago franchise is "going the college gym route" at the UIC Pavilion, a 22-year-old facility that seats between 7,500 and 8,000 for basketball. However, the brand new Agganis Arena (2005/7,200 basketball capacity), as well as either Conte Forum (1988/8,600 basketball capacity) or Matthews Arena (1995 renovation/6,200 basketball capacity), all located on Greater Boston campuses, in your opinion wouldn't be "palatable alternatives" if the Fleet Center wasn't available to a Boston-based WNBA franchise. You do realize that such a stand makes absolutely no sense, right? Why the double-standard? Why do you consider a college facility a perfectly suitable home for a WNBA team in Chicago, while a campus arena in Boston is, in your estimation, somehow sub-par? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanB06 Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 I think I may have stepped in it here. I think I should have written "most desirable" instead of "least undesirable". Same meaning, different connotation. I should've known better.Of course I'd rather see the team in Agganis if the Fleet weren't available for some reason. From what I've seen of the place on TV, it looks pretty nice. Â Sodboy13 said: As you watch more basketball, you will learn to appreciate the difference between "defense" and "couldn't find the rim with a pair of bloodhounds and a Garmin." meet the new page, not the same as the old page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian in Boston Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 "Most desirable"... "least undesirable". The difference between the two is semantics. I'm more baffled by your contention that none of the Boston-based campus facilities would - in your opinion - be "palatable alternatives" to the Fleet Center, yet you're "happy" that the WNBA's Chicago franchise is "going the college gym route". Why, in your opinion, would playing in a college facility in Boston be less than "palatable", while playing in a college facility in Chicago is something that seems to strike you as a good thing? Bottom line? IMHO, unless the WNBA team in a given market is owned by an NBA team in the same city that either (1) owns its facility or (2) has a "sweetheart" relationship with the arena in which the NBA team plays, it would seem to me that a WNBA franchise might well be better served playing in a nice on-campus facility. Generally speaking, such facilities are smaller. Therefore, it should be easier to create a demand for the WNBA product amongst the members of a smaller target market. Attending the event would be a more up-close and intimate experience. There would always be the opportunity to move to a larger, more "pro-oriented" facility in the future, should demand for the product call for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaolinaJoe Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 If Agganis is good enough for Duran Duran and Sting, it's good enough for the WNBA. "It is the soldier, not the reporter, who has given us freedom of thepress. It is the soldier, not the poet, who has given us freedom ofspeech. It is the soldier, not the campus organizer, who has given usthe freedom to demonstrate. And it is the soldier who salutes theflag, serves beneath the flag, whose coffin is draped by the flag, andwho allows the protester to burn the flag."Marine Chaplain Dennis Edward O' Brien Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralW91 Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 Just out of curiosity, was there any effort to secure the Rosemont Horizon (I think it's Allstate Arena now, don't quote me on that) as the venue? The place holds about 10,000, no? I thought it was around 18,000.The arena does have a Pro Sports History, with the Rush there now and the Skyliners of the ABA2000 there in 00-01(avg. of 2,147/game) www.ABAsite.tk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markar14 Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 I live in the Chicago area and am a frequent visitor of UIC Flames men's bball games at the Pavillion. Although it's not the UC by any standard, it is a good fit for a new team that will probably not see too much fan support for their first couple of seasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclopsis Joe Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 What about the Chicago Cows?(it goes w/ the Bulls like many of the WNBA teams do...)what a logo that would be The Mrs. O'Leary's Cows. I don't speak for democrats, democrats don't speak for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.