Pharos04 Posted February 19, 2005 Share Posted February 19, 2005 very very interestingguess it's supposed to match the hat herebizarre i swear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthMan Posted February 19, 2005 Share Posted February 19, 2005 been mentioned, but, yeah thats hideous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pharos04 Posted February 19, 2005 Author Share Posted February 19, 2005 dammit i had a feeling it had been mentioned but i couldn't find it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griffelh Posted February 19, 2005 Share Posted February 19, 2005 They changed the hat. It now has a black bill to match the jersey. It is in the StarStruck catalogue and I saw it on yhe news last night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quantum Posted February 19, 2005 Share Posted February 19, 2005 Not the ugliest thing I've seen, but it's not great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted February 19, 2005 Share Posted February 19, 2005 THe black name and numbers on the blue is hard to see. look at this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanB06 Posted February 19, 2005 Share Posted February 19, 2005 I dunno, I think the outlines on the letters do enough to make it pop.What I want to know is: what's with the two different types of caps? The field staff are wearing the game hats while the grunts wear the BP caps? What gives? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vicfurth Posted February 19, 2005 Share Posted February 19, 2005 The hats are much worse than the jerseys, which are actually okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moser316 Posted February 19, 2005 Share Posted February 19, 2005 I'm one of those few people who don't mind the Mets using black as part of their color scheme (and I use this as a general rule with most teams that add black into their palette) as long as they use it very sparingly as an ACCENT color. Clearly, this breaks that rule, and as a result the black looks forced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronChefShark Posted February 19, 2005 Share Posted February 19, 2005 I'm one of those few people who don't mind the Mets using black as part of their color scheme niether do I, simply because it shows that they now want to be more connected to the Giants then they do the dodgers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted February 19, 2005 Share Posted February 19, 2005 Well they have always used the fancy NY the Giants had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JQK Posted February 19, 2005 Share Posted February 19, 2005 I'm one of those few people who don't mind the Mets using black as part of their color scheme niether do I, simply because it shows that they now want to be more connected to the Giants then they do the dodgers I wonder.. who hates who more?Me and the Red Sox?Or Sharky and the Dodgers?Anyways, anything is an improvement over those "Men At Work" monstrosities they wore last year.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmackman Posted February 19, 2005 Share Posted February 19, 2005 If the Mets can do the black shoulders, I think the Marlins should do teal BP jerseys with black shoulders. At least that would make sense. Either that, or leave the black, and make the shoulders teal and the MARLINS on the front Teal. Here's an idea of how the Marlins just keep getting blacker and blacker from 1993 till now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.