Joshawaggie Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 So rumor has it that the Vikes may use that #7 pick to trade for Laverrneus Coles. he's not worth that. But I think that rumor is false, because Paul Allen (voice of the vikes) has talked to some people and they are saying they will be going after Derrick Mason, or Muhsin Muhammed, if he's released. @josh_j12 CFA- Fargo Bobcats Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac6674 Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 As an Oakland fan, I love the deal. Now, if we can sign Lamont Jordan we'll have the power back to fit the Norv Turner philosophy. Napoleon Harris has been an underachiever his whole Oakland tenure, and there is no one back or edge rusher that's really worth the 7th pick.I think Randy should wear #81; it's got some tradition with Warren Wells and Tim Brown; or 21, like Cliff Branch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleFan344 Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Champ got burned like 21 times when the Broncos played the Chiefs in K.C. Anyone hear anything about the Broncos trading Droughns to Miami for Surtain?? It was a rumor a couple weeks ago, but it's kinda died down. And EaglesFan, did you just reply to your own post?? Fantastic! And with you having the Sunday Ticket, it boggles my mind that you didn't know that the Falcons' receivers were somewhere between terrible and mediocre, which is why they don't have good stats. Vick's progression goes from 1) Crumpler to 2) Covered receiver to 3) Crumpler to 4) A blanketed Crumpler to 5) Hell, I guess I'll just run with it. I know Vicks recievers arent that good. But look at Price. He was good with Buffalo and sucks with Vick. He had Moulds in Buffalo, but he also had a better QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
See Red Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Champ got burned like 21 times when the Broncos played the Chiefs in K.C. Anyone hear anything about the Broncos trading Droughns to Miami for Surtain?? It was a rumor a couple weeks ago, but it's kinda died down. And EaglesFan, did you just reply to your own post?? Fantastic! And with you having the Sunday Ticket, it boggles my mind that you didn't know that the Falcons' receivers were somewhere between terrible and mediocre, which is why they don't have good stats. Vick's progression goes from 1) Crumpler to 2) Covered receiver to 3) Crumpler to 4) A blanketed Crumpler to 5) Hell, I guess I'll just run with it. I know Vicks recievers arent that good. But look at Price. He was good with Buffalo and sucks with Vick. He had Moulds in Buffalo, but he also had a better QB. It's a lot easier being a #2 behind Eric Moulds than it is to be a #1 without a threat of any kind on the other side of the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gosioux76 Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 So rumor has it that the Vikes may use that #7 pick to trade for Laverrneus Coles. he's not worth that. But I think that rumor is false, because Paul Allen (voice of the vikes) has talked to some people and they are saying they will be going after Derrick Mason, or Muhsin Muhammed, if he's released. I'd love to see Muhsin with the Vikes. That guy's pretty good. Mason is, too. I wouldn't trade that pick for Coles, though. The free agent crop is pretty thick. Hell, i'd even take Plaxico Burress via free agency before trading a high draft pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joshawaggie Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 So rumor has it that the Vikes may use that #7 pick to trade for Laverrneus Coles. he's not worth that. But I think that rumor is false, because Paul Allen (voice of the vikes) has talked to some people and they are saying they will be going after Derrick Mason, or Muhsin Muhammed, if he's released. I'd love to see Muhsin with the Vikes. That guy's pretty good. Mason is, too. I wouldn't trade that pick for Coles, though. The free agent crop is pretty thick. Hell, i'd even take Plaxico Burress via free agency before trading a high draft pick. exactly. If they trade the pick for Coles, I may need a new team, ahaha. @josh_j12 CFA- Fargo Bobcats Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleFan344 Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 So rumor has it that the Vikes may use that #7 pick to trade for Laverrneus Coles. he's not worth that. But I think that rumor is false, because Paul Allen (voice of the vikes) has talked to some people and they are saying they will be going after Derrick Mason, or Muhsin Muhammed, if he's released. I'd love to see Muhsin with the Vikes. That guy's pretty good. Mason is, too. I wouldn't trade that pick for Coles, though. The free agent crop is pretty thick. Hell, i'd even take Plaxico Burress via free agency before trading a high draft pick. Hopefully they get Burress. Because I want Coles, Moose or Mason to be in Eagles green. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
See Red Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 I'd keep the #7 pick and draft Mike Williams, personally. And if he's not there, I'm sure Braylon Edwards will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lost_limey Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 I'd love them to trade the pick for Coles, my skins wants as many picks as possible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 I'd keep the #7 pick and draft Mike Williams, personally. And if he's not there, I'm sure Braylon Edwards will be. thats what i was thinking, but i think tampa would take him at #5. or that bad ass from Oklahoma, his name is like Dale Cody or something On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.