BallWonk Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 The more I see it, the more the Nationals' pretzel W is growing on me. Especially once I noticed the subtle improvements over the ugly pretzel that the unpopular and sucky Senators wore before they left town. But two things still bug me. First, the little arm on the left. It's just too Walgreen's for my taste. Second, I don't like how the two loops are so different in their curves. So I threw together these to see what a symmetrical pretzel-W would look like, with and without the rakish tilt of the Nationals' caps.Does amputating the arm improve the W? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lost_limey Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 It's less Walgreen's, but too me, it's no longer an obvious 'W' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-kj Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 Eh. I just can't say I like the curly cursive fluffy W in either case. Bah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee. Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 My main concern with this revision is that at no time can we discern, in any way, shape or form, an "N" hidden inside the "W". The elimination of the eagle's head also concerns me, for how else are we to know the team is based in Washington? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the admiral Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 My main concern with this revision is that at no time can we discern, in any way, shape or form, an "N" hidden inside the "W". The elimination of the eagle's head also concerns me, for how else are we to know the team is based in Washington? He's right. You'd better make about fifty more revisions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjteggy05 Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 My main concern with this revision is that at no time can we discern, in any way, shape or form, an "N" hidden inside the "W". The elimination of the eagle's head also concerns me, for how else are we to know the team is based in Washington? He's right. You'd better make about fifty more revisions. .....and make sure to attack anyone who doesn't like the idea or the logo....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted March 11, 2005 Share Posted March 11, 2005 It dont work for me the arm is needed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winters in buffalo Posted March 11, 2005 Share Posted March 11, 2005 It looks...um.... feminine.Or like a Q. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyRock Posted March 11, 2005 Share Posted March 11, 2005 I don't like it less or more than the current, but sure, I'll take it - good job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted March 11, 2005 Share Posted March 11, 2005 ehhh, i couldnt really tell the difference. everytime i see a post titled Modifying the Nationals W, i cringe and get scared. most of you know what im talking about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_cynic Posted March 11, 2005 Share Posted March 11, 2005 Ehh, I like the current one they're using better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quantum Posted March 11, 2005 Share Posted March 11, 2005 Ehh, I like the current one they're using better. Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickV Posted March 12, 2005 Share Posted March 12, 2005 ehhh, i couldnt really tell the difference. everytime i see a post titled Modifying the Nationals W, i cringe and get scared. most of you know what im talking about AGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Run for your lives!!!!!!!!!!! The return of ProLogo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.