mr71 Posted August 16, 2003 Share Posted August 16, 2003 http://cgi.aol.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?V...item=2744788737I won this and I am not happy!! Try to see why!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMS1122 Posted August 16, 2003 Share Posted August 16, 2003 no sleeve logo? ??? GMS on dribbbleErie Apparel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEAD! Posted August 16, 2003 Share Posted August 16, 2003 no sleeve logo? ???Yeah, I think so too! Is it just me or does the uniform seem too white? It should be cream right? mmmmmmmmmm..... cream... I saw, I came, I left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMac Posted August 16, 2003 Share Posted August 16, 2003 I dunno maybe its just me but the letters look plastic GDB... Brothers from other Mothers www.pifflespodcast.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC97 Posted August 16, 2003 Share Posted August 16, 2003 This could be the style just prior to the cream/sleeve logo style that they adopted in 2000. I think this jersey is accurate as of 1999. --- Chris Creamer Founder/Editor, SportsLogos.Net "The Mothership" • News • Facebook • X/Twitter • Instagram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr71 Posted August 16, 2003 Author Share Posted August 16, 2003 Well, when I bid for this, I thought it would be for the pre-2000 style. Unfortunately, here's what I found wrong about it-No Russell logo on the sleeve-No Diamond Collection tag on the bottom-Giants logo is glued on and not sewnAlso, I think the logo is more for the current jersey and not for this era's jersey. I may be wrong about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDunn Posted August 16, 2003 Share Posted August 16, 2003 I don't remember the 1999 striping, but if the team only made the jersey cream and added the patch, then the striping is wrong.Report this seller. He said you were getting an Authentic, but you're not. He may be technically okay because of his wording, but still. In the future, I'd check things out with the guys here before for authenticity and if the guy is a bad seller. Like BJ4Bama. He has a high approval, but the stuff he sells(autographs, jerseys) are fakes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted August 16, 2003 Share Posted August 16, 2003 That does appear to be the current script on the old jersey.The current script is arced, as opposed to the old script which was arched. I believe that is correct anyway. JUSTIN STRIEBEL | PORTFOLIO | RESUME | CONTACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronChefShark Posted August 16, 2003 Share Posted August 16, 2003 as a giants fan who owns both the 94-99 authentic home jersey AND the current authentic home jersey, I must say that this is DEFINITLY the 94-99 era jersey. its not supposed to have a shoulder logo of any kind.however, that is by no means an authentic jersey. the numbers do look indeed glued on. this is a replica jersey. as a replication of the old jersey, it is correct. the trim on the sleeves AND the script are correct for that era's jersey. but it is definitly NOT authentic like I said.the seller obviously gave out wrong information by calling in "authentic" US state flag concepts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr71 Posted August 16, 2003 Author Share Posted August 16, 2003 Well, I'm not too mad since I only paid $25 but I'm concerned about the logo. It doesn't look like it's from the 99 season and it seems the glue might fall off. Hopefully, my letterer can reinforce the logo onto the jersey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puckguy14 Posted August 16, 2003 Share Posted August 16, 2003 I agree with everyone. That is replica. This is what I call an authentic replica. The Giants sell three versions since the 1994 logo change. First one is a replica where the lettering is heat glued on and is very replica-ish. The second one is the one all MLB teams have. Its the authentic replica. This is the one where it can look like an authentic jersey, with the sewn lettering and patches, but does not have the MLB patch in the back. And then the authentic. 2004 San Jose Sharks 7th Man Fan of the Year San Jose Gold Miners - 4x Lombardi Cup Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted August 17, 2003 Share Posted August 17, 2003 Well, I'm gonna go back on what I said on the script. It looks like it's not as arced as I thought, and mostly arched like the old one, plus it does not have the tan drop shadow. However, according to this, the trim is off. This is from the MLB, and then from that one Dressed To The Nines site.I'll check some baseball cards later. JUSTIN STRIEBEL | PORTFOLIO | RESUME | CONTACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M59 Posted August 17, 2003 Share Posted August 17, 2003 Just made a quick trip to the Dressed to the Nines site, and perhaps we should re-name it Dressed to the Eights...where are the post-1994 ALTERNATE jerseys? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.