jkrdevil Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 And no surprise the mistrake involves hockey. In their season preview the did the top games in NHL history. This is in the honorable mention part. ? Stars-Sabres, Game 7 of 1999 Cup finals: Brett Hull's controversial in-the-crease goal stands and the Stars lift Lord Stanley. 1 problem, the series didn't go 7 games. The Hull goal happened in Game 6. If the Sabres had won the game it would have forced a game seven but the goal happened in game 6. Way to go ESPN. http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/preview2005/...tory?id=2172429 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 I'm sure ESPN has the Bill Buckner game as a Game 7 as well, and on top of that you'd have to be an "Insider" to view it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclopsis Joe Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 And no surprise the mistrake involves hockey. In their season preview the did the top games in NHL history. This is in the honorable mention part. ? Stars-Sabres, Game 7 of 1999 Cup finals: Brett Hull's controversial in-the-crease goal stands and the Stars lift Lord Stanley. 1 problem, the series did go 7 games. The Hull goal happened in Game 6. If the Sabres had won the game it would have forced a game seven but the goal happened in game 6. Way to go ESPN. http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/preview2005/...tory?id=2172429 Irony. I don't speak for democrats, democrats don't speak for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkrdevil Posted September 30, 2005 Author Share Posted September 30, 2005 And no surprise the mistrake involves hockey. In their season preview the did the top games in NHL history. This is in the honorable mention part. ? Stars-Sabres, Game 7 of 1999 Cup finals: Brett Hull's controversial in-the-crease goal stands and the Stars lift Lord Stanley. 1 problem, the series did go 7 games. The Hull goal happened in Game 6. If the Sabres had won the game it would have forced a game seven but the goal happened in game 6. Way to go ESPN. http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/preview2005/...tory?id=2172429 Irony. No, ESPN broke into this site and changed my post to try to cover their mistake. Or I just didn't proofread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
appleclock Posted October 1, 2005 Share Posted October 1, 2005 That "no goal" game wasn't all that great. If you're a Dallas fan perhaps... I am not one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabrejeff Posted October 1, 2005 Share Posted October 1, 2005 Last night on ESPN2's Bottom Line they had...SABRES 0 WILD 5when it should have been...WILD 3 SABRES 5And on their site today it says, "Wild 5, Sabres 3". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclopsis Joe Posted October 2, 2005 Share Posted October 2, 2005 And no surprise the mistrake involves hockey. In their season preview the did the top games in NHL history. This is in the honorable mention part. ? Stars-Sabres, Game 7 of 1999 Cup finals: Brett Hull's controversial in-the-crease goal stands and the Stars lift Lord Stanley. 1 problem, the series did go 7 games. The Hull goal happened in Game 6. If the Sabres had won the game it would have forced a game seven but the goal happened in game 6. Way to go ESPN. http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/preview2005/...tory?id=2172429 Irony. No, ESPN broke into this site and changed my post to try to cover their mistake. Or I just didn't proofread. Oh, nevermind then. I don't speak for democrats, democrats don't speak for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.