Jump to content

Bootleggers support terrorism


thephilliephanatic

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

I'm new to the forums, but have been collecting and studying the Philadelphia Phillies uniforms, hats, statistics etc. for a few years now, exclusively. (Please don't pass judgement on me or feel the need to inform me that the Atlanta Braves are a crushing force in the National League.) :D I'm REALLY happy to have found this site. It's very frustrating to have a hobby that no one in my vicinity seems to care about.

Anyway, I was looking at Mitchell & Ness' website this morning and noticed an article had been posted in regards to terrorists funding their efforts with bogus knockoff products. Any feelings on this?

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 years later...

I'm getting an error message.

Either way, it's pretty sad that Mitchell & Ness would rather try to scare its customers from the boogeyman than admit how ridiculous the markups on their products really are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not realize that, otherwise I wouldn't have replied. I saw the date on the post above mine, but not that of the OP.

Regardless, the point stands.

No, your point doesn't stand, because they probably didn't take it down ASAP, they just took it down sometime in the nine years since it was published. I don't know how you could critique an article without reading it, but I would withhold my judgment until actually seeing what they argue and what evidence they provide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, your point doesn't stand, because they probably didn't take it down ASAP, they just took it down sometime in the nine years since it was published. I don't know how you could critique an article without reading it, but I would withhold my judgment until actually seeing what they argue and what evidence they provide.

Thank you for the lesson on the rules of evidence, Judge Wapner :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

illwauk supports necrophilia.

Don't look at me... this thread was on the front page when I responded and I didn't even bother to check the timestamp. It must've gotten bumped up when the board's layout was being changed and all kinds of posts were out of chronological order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.