See Red Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 Im sick of everybody saying Vick is good because he "wins games". Is that not the point of the game? Teams win games, not single players. So why don't they win without him?I agree that teams win games, but you can't deny his impact when they can only win when he's playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleFan344 Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 Im sick of everybody saying Vick is good because he "wins games". Is that not the point of the game? Teams win games, not single players. So why don't they win without him?I agree that teams win games, but you can't deny his impact when they can only win when he's playing. They didnt have him for what, ONE game this yr? They would of lost that anyway. It was against New England. And in 2003 that was a different team. They had the worst D in the NFL that yr. They wouldnt of been a playoff team with Vick anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HedleyLamarr Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 Im sick of everybody saying Vick is good because he "wins games". Is that not the point of the game? Teams win games, not single players. So why don't they win without him?I agree that teams win games, but you can't deny his impact when they can only win when he's playing. They didnt have him for what, ONE game this yr? They would of lost that anyway. It was against New England. And in 2003 that was a different team. They had the worst D in the NFL that yr. They wouldnt of been a playoff team with Vick anyway. They lost that game because the defense didn't show up. Schaub threw for over 300 yards that game.Personally, I think that Mora shouldn't be punished. I want a coach that gets pissed off at losing. Screw the image the NFL wants for their coaches, I want someone who takes losing personally and doesn't care who sees him mad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclopsis Joe Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 Im sick of everybody saying Vick is good because he "wins games". Is that not the point of the game? Teams win games, not single players. The Eagles know a lot about that. I don't speak for democrats, democrats don't speak for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleFan344 Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 Im sick of everybody saying Vick is good because he "wins games". Is that not the point of the game? Teams win games, not single players. The Eagles know a lot about that. Thats how they beat ATL last yr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclopsis Joe Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 Im sick of everybody saying Vick is good because he "wins games". Is that not the point of the game? Teams win games, not single players. The Eagles know a lot about that. Thats how they beat ATL last yr Not a real exclusive club. I don't speak for democrats, democrats don't speak for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.