In 5..4..3..2..1 Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
See Red Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 I can't even tell where the ball is, to be honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsfan39 Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 Yet I still think your wrong... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In 5..4..3..2..1 Posted February 12, 2006 Author Share Posted February 12, 2006 The ball is tucked in his arm, the end of the football should be right inside where his elbow is. His whole elbow is over the plane of the goal line...TD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sport Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 he was in, and I don't think that this is even the right picture. Go Back a couple of frames and he got it in in the air. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBGKon Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 I agree Big Ben was in physically, but I don't believe the ball was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 He said on Letterman he was not in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 Ahhh thats great, but isnt this the ball? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
See Red Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 Ahhh thats great, but isnt this the ball? Doesn't look like it to me, but then again, I can't find the ball to begin with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Clemente Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 He said on Letterman he was not in Actually, his exact words were "I don't THINK I was in." Doesn't mean he wasn't, it just means he himself can not prove it.And even if he wasn't in, Seattle still lost.--Roger "Time?" Clemente. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveR Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 the football should be right inside where his elbow is. His whole elbow is over the plane of the goal line...TD Should be isn't good enough. If you can't see the ball, you can't tell.This video evidence isn't strong enough to overturn the on-field ruling, even if the on-field ruling was that Ben didn't get in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puckguy14 Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 Wow, and to wonder if there was a message board in 1999, how much the no goal arguement would last? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 Well it does not make as much difference as it could have it was 3rd down and the Steelers would have gone for it at the 1 inch line it would be hard to imagine the Bus not getting that inch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VitaminD Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 Well it does not make as much difference as it could have it was 3rd down and the Steelers would have gone for it at the 1 inch line it would be hard to imagine the Bus not getting that inch. It took them 3 downs to get to the 1 inch line from 1st and goal inside the 5. Nothing is a sure thing, not even the Bus. (What happened to Jerome on his last goalline carry before the Super Bowl?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Audiodrama Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 Super Bowl's over. We can argue this point one way or another and it's not gonna make a difference. Drop the damn debate, please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilgump Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 yea.. at least it was closer than the vinny testaverde scandal.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick 1733 Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 Personally, here's my opinion.He was NOT in while carrying the ball in the air. As he was coming down, before his arm hit the ground the ball was knocked loose. The ball was moving around underneath him and he recovered it accross the goal line and therefore was a touchdown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VandyDelphia Mike Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 yea.. at least it was closer than the vinny testaverde scandal.. Also against the Seahawks. What is it with this team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 yea.. at least it was closer than the vinny testaverde scandal.. Also against the Seahawks. What is it with this team? Intrestingly enough it was the same ref who blew the Jets vs Seahawks goaline call in 1998 a week earlier screwed the Steelers with the coin toss. His name was Phil Luckett.http://www.answers.com/topic/phil-luckett Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEAD! Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 VINNY WAS IN !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.