kansascityjayhawk4 Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 San Antionio ChapparalsLas Vegas AcesCharlotte Blackhawks?Portland KingfishKC Jayhawk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerkstore Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 Florida Marlins, mark it down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBGKon Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 Florida Marlins, mark it down if not that, how about the South Florida Marlins (to focus on the area since there is a 2nd team in Florida) or Miami Marlins if the ballpark can be built in Miami city limits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
returntoglory16 Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 San Antonio Rebels.orSan Antonio 36ers (Battle of the Alamo: 1836). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazz013 Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 San Antonio AcousticsSan Antonio ArmadillosSan Antonio AztecsSan Antonia BanderillerosSan Antonio MatadorsSan Antonio 36 (no ers just Thirty-Six) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthSidePride Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 Las Vegas SharksNow there is no sharks in Vegas, but there are card sharks, and sharks is a pretty cool name by itself. They would be the Card Sharks, but Sharks for short, like the Devil Rays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the admiral Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 San Antonio Banderilleros Oh come on, who's gonna pronounce THAT one? Bond-air-ee-yair-ohs? Broadcasters around the leagues are gonna make Harry Caray sound like Jon Miller as they fumble their way through that one. San Antonio 36 (no ers just Thirty-Six)Not gonna get past Hispanic lobbyists. Plus, if you're not from Texas or aren't a history buff, "36," or even "1836," has no relevance to people. Plus just "36" sounds too abstract for the majors, where singular noun team names are de facto verboten. 36 what? There are 9 guys on the field, 25 on the roster. The hell does 36 mean? Okay, Texas independence, but nobody's gonna know that.I like Norfolk Torpedoes; I'm working on a concept for it. Torps for short? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winghaz Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 San Antonio GauchosOregon ExplorersLas Vegas BombersMemphis Pharohs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred T. Jane Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 San Antonio Conquistadores, or Dukes for short. Too bad the Dukes were an affiliate of the Padres, then it would be perfect! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbeach40 Posted April 25, 2006 Share Posted April 25, 2006 Am I the only one concerned with division alignment? While I don't like the NL Central six team/Al West four team discrepancy, the divisions as are at least make sense. So if the Marlins move to San Antonio or Portland, what sense while that make? How about, I don't know, a team in Portland, ME? Well, maybe not... Indianapolis? Nashville? Memphis? Hartford? Columbus? Those cities all make more geographic sense than Las Vegas, San Antonio or Portland. I used to be concerned with divisional alignment, but then I had an epiphany and realized the current alignment with an even number in each league allows for all thirty teams to play on any given day. If you have fifteen in each, you'd have at least two teams idle each day (unless interleague play was stepped up big time). You'd have off-days for teams on weekends, when (I assume) you'd have the best attendance.I think MLB is more interested in locations that make financial sense than geographic sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrh31584 Posted April 25, 2006 Share Posted April 25, 2006 Am I the only one concerned with division alignment? While I don't like the NL Central six team/Al West four team discrepancy, the divisions as are at least make sense. So if the Marlins move to San Antonio or Portland, what sense while that make? How about, I don't know, a team in Portland, ME? Well, maybe not... Indianapolis? Nashville? Memphis? Hartford? Columbus? Those cities all make more geographic sense than Las Vegas, San Antonio or Portland. I used to be concerned with divisional alignment, but then I had an epiphany and realized the current alignment with an even number in each league allows for all thirty teams to play on any given day. If you have fifteen in each, you'd have at least two teams idle each day (unless interleague play was stepped up big time). You'd have off-days for teams on weekends, when (I assume) you'd have the best attendance.I think MLB is more interested in locations that make financial sense than geographic sense. Interleague play would not have to be increased at all if each league had 15 teams. It would just have to be spread throughout the year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the admiral Posted April 25, 2006 Share Posted April 25, 2006 Nobody wants that, though. Leave the leagues separate as much as possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leopard88 Posted April 25, 2006 Share Posted April 25, 2006 San Antonio Conquistadores, or Dukes for short. Too bad the Dukes were an affiliate of the Padres, then it would be perfect! How do you get Dukes from Conquistadores? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian in Boston Posted April 25, 2006 Share Posted April 25, 2006 Too bad the Dukes were an affiliate of the Padres, then it would be perfect! The Albuquerque Dukes were never a San Diego Padres affiliate. The former Dukes franchise became a Padres affiliate after relocating to Portland in 2001. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian in Boston Posted April 25, 2006 Share Posted April 25, 2006 How do you get Dukes from Conquistadores? In the case of Albuquerque, New Mexico, the city was founded by conquistadores and named in honor of the 10th Duke of Alburquerque, viceroy of New Spain. Hence, the somewhat tenuous connection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KJTALBOT Posted April 25, 2006 Share Posted April 25, 2006 The largest three media markets (as ranked by Neilsen) are:19) Sacramento - Stockton - Modesto, CA20) Orlando - Daytona Beach - FL23) Portland, ORMiami - Ft. Lauderdale is # 17#27 Charlotte, NC#28 Hartford - New Haven, CT#29 Raleigh-Durham, NC#30 Nashville, TN#35 Greenville - Spartanville- Ashville, NC and #36 Salt Lake Cityare all ranked above San Antonio - #37These are TV homes, people.Norfolk is #42Las Vegas is #48Miami should keep their team.Charlotte and Portland should get expansion teams.That would create two 16 team leagues with 4 teams in each division.You could keep the wildcard or only let division winners in the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the admiral Posted April 25, 2006 Share Posted April 25, 2006 It doesn't matter where Miami falls in Nielsen rankings if the Marlins can't sell tickets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KJTALBOT Posted April 25, 2006 Share Posted April 25, 2006 Oh, Albuquerque is #46. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the admiral Posted April 25, 2006 Share Posted April 25, 2006 Oh, Marlins are #30. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred T. Jane Posted April 25, 2006 Share Posted April 25, 2006 How do you get Dukes from Conquistadores? In the case of Albuquerque, New Mexico, the city was founded by conquistadores and named in honor of the 10th Duke of Alburquerque, viceroy of New Spain. Hence, the somewhat tenuous connection. Yeh, tenuous connection, but a nod to the team's namesake nonetheless. Related question-- If it wasn't the Padres, then wasn't the Dukes the affiliate of the Dodgers? For some queer reason I've always gotten them mixed up... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.