Stock Posted January 21, 2003 Share Posted January 21, 2003 Very disappointing IMO...SB XXXVIII Logo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bosox Posted January 21, 2003 Share Posted January 21, 2003 If any of you have seen the SB logo Madden 2003 gave the Houston SB, it is much better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JQK Posted January 21, 2003 Share Posted January 21, 2003 It's not bad. It's not this years logo, or XXVII or XXX or XXVIII or XXXI.It could have been worse. It could have been like XXII or XXIII, or XXVI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twootwoot Posted January 21, 2003 Share Posted January 21, 2003 Indeed a disappointment. The worst Super Bowl logo since the Super Bowl XXIX with the 49ers and Chargers. Hopefully, they would change it but doubt it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJR Posted January 22, 2003 Share Posted January 22, 2003 What is it with Houston and futuristic, western logos? It just doesn't work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisTex Posted January 22, 2003 Share Posted January 22, 2003 "The Super Bowl XXXVIII logo was developed by the NFL Creative Services design team and designed by Todd Radom, a graphic designer based in Katonah, New York."Is this the best they could come up with? What exactly is a futuristic oval? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDunn Posted January 22, 2003 Share Posted January 22, 2003 That logo completely sucks. Did they have a budget of 25 cents? Were their resources a spirograph and some sort of bubble gum wrapper? This years logo is awesome, but like Texas :angry:, that 2004 logo sucks. I also think it's cool how this years logo contains a lighthouse and the two teams have names pertaining to the seas. The NFL is rigged, I tell ya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
random Posted January 22, 2003 Share Posted January 22, 2003 i actually kinda like it. its simple, its old school, its texas. i think the one for this year is too loud. it believe suceeds in its simplicity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-kj Posted January 22, 2003 Share Posted January 22, 2003 This year's isn't very loud at all, it's a nice muted colour scheme, and ties in very well with San Diego.That XXXVIII logo? Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac the Knife Posted January 22, 2003 Share Posted January 22, 2003 Yecch. That's all I have to say. Yecch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JQK Posted January 22, 2003 Share Posted January 22, 2003 here's a piece of i cooked up in five minuets... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IowaFan26 Posted January 22, 2003 Share Posted January 22, 2003 here's a piece of i cooked up in five minuets...Looks better than what the NFL came up with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted January 23, 2003 Share Posted January 23, 2003 Given a non slanted star and I think it looks pretty good. Given a non slanted star and more time and I am sure it would look great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyTexas Posted January 29, 2003 Share Posted January 29, 2003 Check out the SB XXXVIII Organizing Committee logo. This logo is incredible when compared to the NFL's official logo. http://www.superbowlxxxviii.org/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted January 29, 2003 Share Posted January 29, 2003 Check out the SB XXXVIII Organizing Committee logo. This logo is incredible when compared to the NFL's official logo. http://www.superbowlxxxviii.org/Your incredibly right. How does that happen. The more I look at the actual logo the more I think a clean version will look nice, but not great. Simplay changing the colors to that of the committee would help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.