Jump to content

Bruins logo


patsox

Recommended Posts

No. It's too cartoony.

It's not an official Bruins logo. It was created specifically for X-Line hats.

There have been many concepts already using this logo. Yes, it's better than the Pooh. But that doesn't mean it should be used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bruin.gif

Pooh bear is not a bad looking logo for the shoulders.

66_2.JPG

Pooh does not belong on the front of the jersey. The jagged striping at the hem, the wordmark on the shoulder and the fact the jersey is yellow are not helping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems that pretty much every bear logo in sports is kinda lame. Pooh bear is the prime example and the Vanvouver/Memphis Grizzlies logo is bad too. The Chicago Bears don't have a Bear in their logo and their uniforms are loved. The Chicago Cubs have the bear on their blue jerseys and those look awful too. The Hershey Bears logo is okay but it isn't good compared to other minor league logos. The Alaska Aces bear looks pretty good but it is a polar bear. So in conclusion, Polar Bears in jerseys = okay, Winnie the Pooh=not okay. Stop using Bears as a logo, get creative!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does every logo have to look more "fierce" to be accepted around here? The Bruins are an original six team. They don't need to re-invent their identity or adopt a generic "fierce" bear to attract pre teen fans in the southern states. There's plenty of minor league teams with that logo (identity) allready.

you asked

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does every logo have to look more "fierce" to be accepted around here? The Bruins are an original six team. They don't need to re-invent their identity or adopt a generic "fierce" bear to attract pre teen fans in the southern states. There's plenty of minor league teams with that logo (identity) allready.

you asked

You don't have to be fierce, but you should look good. Yes they are original 6, however, their 3rd jersey is a new school design, so no need for the pooh bear. It doesn't fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does every logo have to look more "fierce" to be accepted around here?

Eh? Read the rest of the posts in this thread... that was the opinion of one poster, don't group the whole community into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you seen the current logo? The point isn't that it needs to be more fierce. It is that it sucks and doesn't belong on an NHL jersey.

If you mean the docile bear, I would agree, but that doesn't mean they need to replace it with another bear. boston has had a few decent designs in their history, a vitage look might suit them better.

The X-line bear looks more suited for a minor league team, i doesn't belong on the NHL level. I know it sounds redundant, but the Origonal 6 teams carry alot of history and an arngy cartoon bear doesn't fit with what the Bruins identity should be (IMO)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems that pretty much every bear logo in sports is kinda lame. Pooh bear is the prime example and the Vanvouver/Memphis Grizzlies logo is bad too. The Chicago Bears don't have a Bear in their logo and their uniforms are loved. The Chicago Cubs have the bear on their blue jerseys and those look awful too. The Hershey Bears logo is okay but it isn't good compared to other minor league logos. The Alaska Aces bear looks pretty good but it is a polar bear. So in conclusion, Polar Bears in jerseys = okay, Winnie the Pooh=not okay. Stop using Bears as a logo, get creative!!!

Ursus maritimus uber alles!

Norge.PNG

:wub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.