sacker12 Posted September 13, 2006 Posted September 13, 2006 http://sports.yahoo.com/sc/news?slug=cnnsi...cnnsi&type=lgns
NJTank Posted September 13, 2006 Posted September 13, 2006 Its like Inspector Colsseau meets Captain Ahab get over it Lance was clean, he just made mince meet out of your race. www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com
Jezus_Ghoti Posted September 13, 2006 Posted September 13, 2006 Yeah, Tank has clearly performed his own scientifically-valid and independently-reviewed tests, so get off Lance's case!
Bleujayone Posted September 13, 2006 Posted September 13, 2006 By the same logic that all the Barry Bonds supporters have...Since the previous years' races are already on the books and there was no proof he was dirty then, it's rather difficult to retroactively try to test him now for proof his body was back then.Unless you have someone stepping forward to say he actually helped or wittnessed Armstrong dope up, and backed it up with some hard evidence, that ship has passed. Guilty or not, specualtion alone cannot convict someone- at least not in sports. We all have our little faults. Mine's in California.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.