drj983 Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 ...and not lookin' so hot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Finally. Ive been waitin quite a bit of time for the Cards to get it right IMO. Too bad most people think im nuts for liking the monochrome though... On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epiphanic Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 I like monochrome done right. The Cardinals all-red looks good. The white shoulders help out the transition.The vikings all-white monochrome is an example of ugly. If they did all-purple though, that wouldn't look too bad. "In the arena of logic, I fight unarmed."I tweet & tumble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infrared41 Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Those all red Cardinals abominations look even more ridiculous when compared to the Cowboys uniforms, mismatched colors and all. The Cardinals look like a freakin' poorly dressed Arena League or high school team. The horror...the horror... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShaftDu Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 as someone who is pro-mono, i don't know if the all red cards look is o-kay. Maybe black socks? It just seems TOO RED. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBPerry Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 WAY TOO MUCH RED!!!!! Add more white than what they have or at leasr have white pants! That all-red look is HORRIBLE! <embed src="http://www.clocklink.com/clocks/5005-Blue.swf?TimeZone=CST&TimeFormat=hhmmssTT" width="180" height="60" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash">joshuabperry@sbcglobal.netMy Webpage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uniguy22 Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 I usually don't mind the monochrome look, but these are terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seattlefan68 Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 People hate the Seahawks' monochrome but praise this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 All red looks like a Human blood clot www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendan Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 People hate the Seahawks' monochrome but praise this?i think its the other way around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomTheAthlete29 Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 I would love it if they had white socks or even black Someone be a World Champ, please!Fantasy Football Keeper League.....PM me if you want to join!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShaftDu Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 All red looks like a Human blood clotyeah, people like myself who don't mind the all black or all blue are not fans of this mess. Yeah, too red, looks like Flash or sometype of super hero is out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
See Red Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 I love monochromes. Particularly when they're done right, since they can look terrible at times.I like these a great deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOldRoman Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 I like monochrome done right. The Cardinals all-red looks good. The white shoulders help out the transition.The vikings all-white monochrome is an example of ugly. If they did all-purple though, that wouldn't look too bad.White shoulders? Are you talking about white armpit slashes?Either way, these are horrible. I have yet to see a team that looks even decent in monochromes.Seattle's are still the worst, and the Bengals are probably 2nd. As bad as these look, I dont think they look as bad as other mono teams. These are terrible mismatched, though.sock - redpants - redjerseys - redhelmets - WHITE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cranium Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 I think that would look better if the pants had more white on them. and they showed more of the white in their socks. These are just painfull to look at. Men in tight red outfits just isn't right for a contact sport. Let me add that I hate the Titans all blue look as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEWJ Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 these are alright...i kinda like em.... they look different than other monochrome sets because it's not that "razzle-dazzle sparkly-material" it looks more like what they se to wear....(The pants at least)(IMO) | BROWNS | BUCKEYES | CAVALIERS | INDIANS | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennisbergan Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 People hate the Seahawks' monochrome but praise this?I'd still like to hear from the so-called fashion "experts" exactly what is wrong with the Seahawks monochromes?The Cowboys were the team today in Arizona dressed like crap. But, those are "traditional" right, so they are OK with some of you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Both teams look bad.The Cowboys obviously need to get their act together.The Cardinals white helmet prevents all red from working. White helmets just don't go well with all one color looks. The Titans look bad with it. The Jets look bad with it. The Dolphins look bad with it. And I'm pretty sure the Colts would look bad in it too. The Cardinals don't manage to be the exception. JUSTIN STRIEBEL | PORTFOLIO | RESUME | CONTACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOldRoman Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 People hate the Seahawks' monochrome but praise this?I'd still like to hear from the so-called fashion "experts" exactly what is wrong with the Seahawks monochromes?The Cowboys were the team today in Arizona dressed like crap. But, those are "traditional" right, so they are OK with some of you?This isn't basketball. Jerseys are not supposed to match pants in football, unless it is all white.The colors suck - the navy is too light. It looks too similar to the other blue, and doesn't stand out on the jerseys. The navy needs to be darker, and the other blue needs to be lighter.The fabric used - they took a page from the Miami Heat, using the worst possible fabric. When players sweat, these jerseys change colors. It is one thing wearing bland crap to start a game, but by the end of the first quarter, the bland crap is darker, taking away its definition. When the players sweat, the jerseys get darker, much darker than the helmets, and it is difficult to distinguish the blue in the body from the navy sleeves. I haven't seen any other football team who's uniforms change colors so drastically when the players sweat. If you could see the sleeves/number outline on the jerseys in the 4th quarter, they wouldn't look so bad. Also, these jerseys show up horribly on TV. On endzone shots for fieldgoals, the players look like bluish blobs. It is enough to make you want to adjust the color and the contrast on your TV. They look different on TV than in person.The pants - once again, the players sweating turns the blue darker, matching it with the navy on the stripe. On TV, all you can see is a thin lime green piping - not good. Also, the sweat marks make it look like all the players peed their pants.Sleeve logo - the logos on their sleeves is the same size as the reebok logo. It looks really bad.Worst of all - these steaming piles are replacing classic uniforms with classic, unique colors. Their current colors are unique, but not in a good way. They look like someone incorrectly mixed blue paint, and this came out. These jerseys are in the discount bin for $1 at Sherwin Williams. These jerseys have no character. They look like the team threw its history out the window and jumped on the "lets take our colors and make them darker" bandwagon. These jerseys would suck even if worn like a real football team, with contrasting jerseys and pants. They will look dated in a couple of years, and will have to be completely changed. They will be looked upon as an embarrassing period piece next to the White Sox' shorts and collars, the teal/purple craze of the 90s, and platform shoes.About the only good things you can say about these jerseys - the helmets are good, and they didn't make their own crazy rounded, jagged, slanted font with triple outlines and drop shadows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthSidePride Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 The only colors that work in monocrome are no colors, such as black or white. This looks horrendous, but not as bad as the Titans or Rams' mono looks HereCometheHawks.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.