FlyersHockey1967 Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 http://msn.foxsports.com/other/story/6214496Unlike Sports Illustrated, Fox Sports actually chooses genuinely ugly jerseys and actually gives (somewhat) descriptive reasons for why they made the list of 10. Best of all, the Vancouver jersey actually made the cut! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericcartman19 Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 That's a real cool jersey. I have an Authentic one from that year not a re-production one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyersHockey1967 Posted November 29, 2006 Author Share Posted November 29, 2006 Lucky... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 Now those are ugly www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruColor Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 Just a quick glance at the article, but the author's way off on some of the years in which these uniforms were worn...for example, he has the Nuggets' rainbow uniforms as being worn from 1976 through 1998. When in reality, they were worn - at least three different versions of them - from 1982-1983 through 1992-1993. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
29a Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 That Canucks jersey isn't even "So ugly it's cool".It's just really damn ugly. I'd be embarrassed to wear it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roars87 Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 Newcastle United shouldnt be on that list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DG_ThenNowForever Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 Newcastle United shouldnt be on that list.Neither should the Buccaneers be, especially at number 1. The modern Bengals, for example, are way worse than the classic Bucs. Further, for what it's worth, I love those Nuggets rainbow jerseys. I would have preferred to see the gradient Hawks in their place. 1 hour ago, ShutUpLutz! said: and the drunken doodoobags jumping off the tops of SUV's/vans/RV's onto tables because, oh yeah, they are drunken drug abusing doodoobags Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 Newcastle United shouldnt be on that list.Neither should the Buccaneers be, especially at number 1. The modern Bengals, for example, are way worse than the classic Bucs. I showed this to a buddy of mine the other day. heh, at least we won SOMETHING this year. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcgd Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 Newcastle United shouldnt be on that list.Neither should the Buccaneers be, especially at number 1. The modern Bengals, for example, are way worse than the classic Bucs. Further, for what it's worth, I love those Nuggets rainbow jerseys. I would have preferred to see the gradient Hawks in their place.The article said it was for the helmet above all else. And I hav to agree with him. The old bucs logo is just an uncomfortable mashup of emotions. Winking, smiling, pirates, (who might kill you...see dagger in mouth) in the wind...not too good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spyboy1 Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 I agree with some of the choices, but since he is taking on all sports from all-time, there's a few obvious ones that I would put in there waaaaaaay before the Newcastle United's cool, classy stripes and the Padres camo jeresys, which I actually think are cool as a one-off.The Astros rainbows were several steps beyond the Nuggets use of the rainbow, that damn Mooterus has to be worse and how does any discussion of horrid jerseys not include the LA King's Burger King or the Ducks Wild Wing? Seriously, if the players won't wear it, it's got to make the list. Click here to read Third String Goalie - The Hockey Jersey of the Day Blog Click here to see my hockey and baseball jersey collection online ?You don?t like to see 20 kids punching 20 other kids. But it?s not a disgrace, It?s hockey.? - Michael Farber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iowahoo Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 Fox article may "back it up with reasoning" making it better than SI, but the descriptions don't make sense and are sometimes just wrong.Newcastle United- Personally I think they look classy and the Toon Army will agree, but reasoning that they were modeled after referees doesn't make sense since in 1894 no refs wore stripped shirts.Golden State- The description mentions the golden gate bridge but the picture of Nate Thurmond (greatest basketball player in Bowling Green history) shows the outline of the state, a different jersey all together. The one he refers to, with the bridge, has one of the coolest things on a jersey in my mind- instead of the team's name or golden state it says "The City"- something I have always thought was pretty cool.So on first glance this article looks good, but once you read it and give it a perusal I just shake my head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBM Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 I totally agree, I think Newcastle's look is very sharp and appealing. I don't know how that could make the list over some hideous NFL attrocities these days (THE NEW VIKINGS HAVE THE WORST FOOTBALL UNI EVER. It's not even close. ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
See Red Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 Terrible list.Newcastle United FC looks great. As do the old Nuggets uniforms, the Padres camos (bonus points for why they wear them, and the old Tampa Bay Buccaneers uniforms. I even like the Dolphins orange alt. The rest of the list is alright, but I can find better examples of horrible uniforms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fjm Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 He might be colorblind too. He calls the Dolphins aqua "mint green" and the Bucs old florida orange "burnt orange". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shumway Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 I disagree with most of the list, actually. The Canucks, Preds, ChiSox, and Lightning are the ones I definitely agree with.- If they weren't the Miami Dolphins, the orange alt wouldn't be so bad. My brother's a huge Phins fan, so I've grown up seeing the turquoise. The orange isn't ugly in my book, just kind of wrong.- The Nuggets rainbows are some of my favorites. He lists them going until 1998...that can't be right. They had the navy blue ones back in NBA Live 95.- As someone mentioned earlier, for a once-a-season deal, the camo Padres aren't that bad.- I really like those Warriors uniforms, actually. Although it says there's a bridge on the back, which I'm curious to see.- I don't get how the Newcastle ones are ugly at all. I think they're some of the nicer soccer uniforms I've seen, actually.I'd throw in the late 90s Houston Rockets with the pinstripes and large, ugly logo. The current Oregon football set could probably fit in there as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
totc Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 Just a quick glance at the article, but the author's way off on some of the years in which these uniforms were worn...for example, he has the Nuggets' rainbow uniforms as being worn from 1976 through 1998. When in reality, they were worn - at least three different versions of them - from 1982-1983 through 1992-1993.Three?? Let me think for a second ... the early version was dark, dark navy with forest green trim, and the Fat Lever shown in the story is the royal blue with gold trim. What was Version 3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epiphanic Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 I think the picks are pretty good overall. Definitely better than the SI picks. The one pick I disagree with is the Miami Dolphins. Their orange set is beautiful and they kick ass in those uniforms. Everything else I can't really argue with the logic. "In the arena of logic, I fight unarmed."I tweet & tumble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
izombie Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 Newcastle United- Personally I think they look classy and the Toon Army will agree, but reasoning that they were modeled after referees doesn't make sense since in 1894 no refs wore stripped shirts.Too true, ref's have never worn striped jerseys for football as far as I know. Seeing as the Toon's strip is practically standard dress for most geordies (but not me, I'm classed as a weirdo for not liking football in Newcastle!!) the author better not step foot here!Malk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winghaz Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 I'd still rate the Chicago White Sox shorts look as the ugliest ever in the history of sports. Even when they wore long pants, they were horrendous. Remember Wilbur Wood and his beer gut sticking WAY out while wearing the non-tucked-in jersey? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.