DG_ThenNowForever Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 I think it's hilarious that no one knows that "autistic kid"'s name, but they're willing to make him 2006's Sportsman of the Year.Again, what exactly makes throwing up a bunch of shots, hitting a few, and then quickly signing a movie deal so enthralling? 1 hour ago, ShutUpLutz! said: and the drunken doodoobags jumping off the tops of SUV's/vans/RV's onto tables because, oh yeah, they are drunken drug abusing doodoobags Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 The Saints? Please. If McMahon can't win because he's not sports, then the Saints can win because they're not a man.Bango.Sorry, but they've picked entire teams before - specifically the 1980 Sportsmen of the year, the USA Olympic Hockey team.They also chose the 1999 Women's Soccer Team and 2004 Red Sox www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPBlueHen Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 The Saints? Please. If McMahon can't win because he's not sports, then the Saints can win because they're not a man.Bango.Sorry, but they've picked entire teams before - specifically the 1980 Sportsmen of the year, the USA Olympic Hockey team.They also chose the 1999 Women's Soccer Team and 2004 Red SoxCan't forget McGwire and Sosa in 1998 either, but we may never know if those two really did deserve it now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.