aragin66 Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 The Cardinals uniforms are classic, and I wouldn't change those to save the world. But I figured that a simple alternate would look great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthpawJosh Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 The Cardinals uniforms are classic, and I wouldn't change those to save the world. But I figured that a simple alternate would look great. Looks nice, but who is "Pujois" ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aragin66 Posted February 1, 2007 Author Share Posted February 1, 2007 The Cardinals uniforms are classic, and I wouldn't change those to save the world. But I figured that a simple alternate would look great. Looks nice, but who is "Pujois" ? Typo...my bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamblinGamblinTiger Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 I like the idea, but it reminds me too much of the Reds... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moser316 Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 Looks nice, but who is "Pujois" ? I think that's how they spell (and pronounce?) Pujols in French Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 Pujois. Is that poo-zhwa, like bourgeois, or poo-joys, like the joys of poo? Anyway, I don't like vests, I don't like that STL, and I don't like thirds for the Cardinals. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSky Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 This says "Reds" more than Cardinals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEWJ Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 Pujois. Is that poo-zhwa, like bourgeois, or poo-joys, like the joys of poo? Anyway, I don't like vests, I don't like that STL, and I don't like thirds for the Cardinals. Sorry.THE ONLY WAY i'VE HEARD IT PRONOUNCED IS:Poo-Holes |Â BROWNS | BUCKEYES | CAVALIERS | INDIANSÂ | Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iowahoo Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 Just say NO to vests. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottysprings Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 Maybe add some navy blue to seem more reminiscent of the cards and less of the reds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted February 2, 2007 Share Posted February 2, 2007 Die, vest. Die a horrible, slow and painful demise. I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCall Posted February 3, 2007 Share Posted February 3, 2007 No. Sorry, but no. Only acceptable vest would be with the single bird on bat logo (like on the Sunday caps) on the front left chest. Maybe some red piping on the pants, around sleeve holes, and down the front. But probably better off plain white like the regualr unis. No sleeve patch. The only use sleeve patches when commemorating something, i.e. Final Season of old Busch Stadium, Inaugural Season of New Busch Stadium, and the deaths of Jack BUck and Darryl Kile. But no regular logo, especially the primary in a white circle, like the Royals used to do, and other teams have done it, but I can remember who else right now. But at least you got the player's name righ.....wait....you didn't get that right either. (All in good fun, dude.) Â Â https://dribbble.com/MakaioCall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
floydnimrod Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 Those who say that this looks like the reds should be reminded of their recent uni change.Anywho, make the jersey red(sleeves too), make the STL navy and outlined in white and we got a deal.Also, the patch on the shoulder = crazy delicious Mancakes: The Bandhttps://twitter.com/FloydNimrod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aragin66 Posted February 4, 2007 Author Share Posted February 4, 2007 Die, vest. Die a horrible, slow and painful demise.Damn McCall my arse hurts, from the ripping you just gave it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCall Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 Die, vest. Die a horrible, slow and painful demise.Damn McCall my arse hurts, from the ripping you just gave it.Much like the NLCS, huh? Â Â https://dribbble.com/MakaioCall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nwtrailtrekker Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 really not feeling the shoulder patch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSky Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Those who say that this looks like the reds should be reminded of their recent uni change.Sorry, don't know, don't care about the Reds' recent changes but somehow, someway, this set just reminds me of the Reds.Crazy me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BallWonk Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 A vest in St. Louis? Meteorologically justified, but too much of a break with tradition for a team with such a conservative look.Patches on undershirt sleeves? That's a bad move regardless of the quality of the rest of the concept.Finaly, what cap would the Cardinals wear? The regular home caps would make the STL too redundant, and the whole set would either look like a cheap knock-off road uniform, or like the Yankees. Given that St. Louis is essentially the anti-Yankees, that's not a good visual move. You could wear the alt caps, with the bird-on-bat, but that would be so much a reversal of their standard look that I think you'd wind up in Twins territory with the aesthetically unmatching uniforms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kewp80 Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Cards don't need a third. Period. I think almost every true Cards fan would agree too. Cardinals -- Rams -- Blues -- Tigers -- Liverpool Check out my music! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.