whitedawg22 Posted March 16, 2007 Share Posted March 16, 2007 Sheer hypocrisy. If he's the star QB, he gets off scot-free. But he's replaceable, so the team gets to take a nice moral stand on a very high horse.Hell, if he was a washed-up safety that commits the same transgression, then blows the Super Bowl for his team, he still would have a job... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tBBP Posted March 16, 2007 Share Posted March 16, 2007 Exactly. Besides, if a 37 year old payroll clerk who has never played a down of NFL football in his life can get chicks, a 35 year old former fullback should be dripping in honey.The real outrage here is that a former FB is a WR coach. That's just silly.Could it be that the guy was a better receiver than a lot of the actual wideouts in the league?So were a lot of RB's the league has seen: Larry Centers with the Cardinals, Moose Johnston (although most of those catches were 5-yd tosses into the left flat after which he'd wheel that oak-tree-thick neck around and go hammer at least one wanna-be tackler's head and run over somebody next), and the one that automatically comes to mind, another Cardinal...Eric Metcalf (who, come to think of it, I can't ever recall EVER having played a down lined up behind a FB or QB).So it ain't entirely out the scope of reason, you see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.