whitedawg22 Posted March 16, 2007 Share Posted March 16, 2007 Sheer hypocrisy. If he's the star QB, he gets off scot-free. But he's replaceable, so the team gets to take a nice moral stand on a very high horse.Hell, if he was a washed-up safety that commits the same transgression, then blows the Super Bowl for his team, he still would have a job... oh ,my god ,i strong recommend you to have a visit on the website ,or if i'm the president ,i would have an barceque with the anthor of the articel . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tBBP Posted March 16, 2007 Share Posted March 16, 2007 Exactly. Besides, if a 37 year old payroll clerk who has never played a down of NFL football in his life can get chicks, a 35 year old former fullback should be dripping in honey.The real outrage here is that a former FB is a WR coach. That's just silly.Could it be that the guy was a better receiver than a lot of the actual wideouts in the league?So were a lot of RB's the league has seen: Larry Centers with the Cardinals, Moose Johnston (although most of those catches were 5-yd tosses into the left flat after which he'd wheel that oak-tree-thick neck around and go hammer at least one wanna-be tackler's head and run over somebody next), and the one that automatically comes to mind, another Cardinal...Eric Metcalf (who, come to think of it, I can't ever recall EVER having played a down lined up behind a FB or QB).So it ain't entirely out the scope of reason, you see. *Disclaimer: I am not an authoritative expert on stuff...I just do a lot of reading and research and keep in close connect with a bunch of people who are authoritative experts on stuff. || dribbble || Behance || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.