Showtime029 Posted March 31, 2007 Share Posted March 31, 2007 This letter was received by somebody who is claiming it is an authentic response from Warner Bros. There are many areas of the letter that are questionable to me along with the WB Logo. You guys are the best around with photoshop, corel, and/or Paint. Real or fake? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief. Posted March 31, 2007 Share Posted March 31, 2007 Considering the next Batman movie is called simply THE DARK KNIGHT and not BATMAN: THE DARK KNIGHT (this was empasized by Nolan and confirmed to be the only Batman movie without "Batman" in the title), I'd say the safe bet is that it's fake. I know that's got nothing to do with photoshop fakery but take the nerd talk for what it's worth. Just seems like a mistake they wouldn't make at a professional movie studio but I could be wrong.More nerd talk: The next Superman movie wouldn't even make sense to be called SUPERMAN 2 because it's actually the 4th movie in the continuity (since Singer basically threw out 3 and 4), so just something to think about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Showtime029 Posted March 31, 2007 Author Share Posted March 31, 2007 Considering the next Batman movie is called simply THE DARK KNIGHT and not BATMAN: THE DARK KNIGHT (this was empasized by Nolan and confirmed to be the only Batman movie without "Batman" in the title), I'd say the safe bet is that it's fake. I know that's got nothing to do with photoshop fakery but take the nerd talk for what it's worth. Just seems like a mistake they wouldn't make at a professional movie studio but I could be wrong.More nerd talk: The next Superman movie wouldn't even make sense to be called SUPERMAN 2 because it's actually the 4th movie in the continuity (since Singer basically threw out 3 and 4), so just something to think about.In regards to "The Dark Knight" and "Superman 2", you're exactly right, this seems a little off considering the source of the letter. Also the movie would be titled "Watchmen" not "The Watchmen". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goforbroke Posted March 31, 2007 Share Posted March 31, 2007 The guy is a "Senior Vice President" and this is supposedly a business letter.He wouldn't say your analysis was "really smart and relevant" or that we "hear your concerns" or that you will be "really excited" Those phrases sound like a second grader wrote this,At best... some intern at WB probably wrote back for whatever reason, maybe as part of his training or something. But a senior vice president would never respond personally to a fan complaint letter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puck Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 Didn't IGN.com say there wasn't going to be a Superman sequel but rather Superman's involvement in the Justice League movie to be Warner's akin to the X-Men series? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief. Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 Didn't IGN.com say there wasn't going to be a Superman sequel but rather Superman's involvement in the Justice League movie to be Warner's akin to the X-Men series?I hope against all hope that doesn't happen. Leave Superman in his world, Batman in his world, and Aquaman..... well who really cares? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDR Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 I would only see Aquaman if Vinny Chase stars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DG_ThenNowForever Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 I would only see Aquaman if Vinny Chase stars.Ditto on that. Amazingly, they managed to make an Aquaman movie look exciting. DC Comics should have struck while the iron was hot! 1 hour ago, ShutUpLutz! said: and the drunken doodoobags jumping off the tops of SUV's/vans/RV's onto tables because, oh yeah, they are drunken drug abusing doodoobags Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yh Posted April 3, 2007 Share Posted April 3, 2007 I would only see Aquaman if Vinny Chase stars.He's out. Tried to strongarm WB for ten mil and they decided to go with Jake Gyllenhall.Ari needs to control his clients a little better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedy Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 I would only see Aquaman if Vinny Chase stars.He's out. Tried to strongarm WB for ten mil and they decided to go with Jake Gyllenhall.Ari needs to control his clients a little better.It was 20 million, they'd only go as high as 12.5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockchalk Posted April 10, 2007 Share Posted April 10, 2007 I'm 90% positive that it isn't the real deal, but it's close. Two things, the paper they use has a deep watermark or background or what have you, and while it wouldn't be completely noticable in a scanned copy, you would still see something, because it's HUGE. Second, I'm pretty sure that there is something off on the logo and wordmark on the top, just can't put my finger on it...FWIW, I'm a manager at a movie theater and at least once a month, the studios send their own checkers in to make sure we have up all the posters, banners, right trailers etc. and they all have their official letters to us to let them in free. One lady had a fake one one night, good times! I've decided to give up hope for all sports teams I follow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack8u Posted April 11, 2007 Share Posted April 11, 2007 He's out. Tried to strongarm WB for ten mil and they decided to go with Jake Gyllenhall."BROKEBACK F****** AQUAMAN!!!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewPF Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 looks kinda sketchy to me... http://i.imgur.com/4ahMZxD.png koizim said: And...and ya know what we gotta do? We gotta go kick him in da penis. He'll be injured. Injured bad. COYS and Go Sox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewPF Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 looks kinda sketchy to me... http://i.imgur.com/4ahMZxD.png koizim said: And...and ya know what we gotta do? We gotta go kick him in da penis. He'll be injured. Injured bad. COYS and Go Sox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
averyj Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 He's out. Tried to strongarm WB for ten mil and they decided to go with Jake Gyllenhall."BROKEBACK F****** AQUAMAN!!!"Ha ha, that'd be like casting Heath Ledger as The Joker for the next Batman movie!Oh wait... You know, I rarely visit ccslsc anymore. I really should fix that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief. Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 So......Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhall can't be casted in any movie from here on out without it being made fun of? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedy Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 Not to mention, Dana Gordon is VP of Production, not this schmuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CityOfWalrus Posted April 21, 2007 Share Posted April 21, 2007 Also he didn't strong-arm him for more money it was just to have alan break the contract so Vinny didn't have to star in another :censored:ty michael bay movie... written by kevin smith... thats one horrible superhero movie right there... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.