CC97 Posted January 8, 2004 Share Posted January 8, 2004 First time I've ever seen the classic jay look like this.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puckguy14 Posted January 8, 2004 Share Posted January 8, 2004 a mix of the first two logos? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiznit1083 Posted January 8, 2004 Share Posted January 8, 2004 The logo makes up for the ugliness (is this even a word?) of the baby blue on the front. Still just the second best logo (the best IMO is still the one before the t-jay). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JQK Posted January 8, 2004 Share Posted January 8, 2004 I always liked that Jay the best. It has the leaf, but it wasn't overpowering in that "Branded In Canada" way the second logo was. It was a great baseball logo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted January 8, 2004 Share Posted January 8, 2004 How did MLB themselves make such a nice logo look so bad?Are they trying to emphasize the retro feel by changing the way it actually was to this skewed and ugly looking thing?Ironically, that logo, as skewed and as bad a representation of the original logo that it is, is still better than the what the Blue Jays have now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cianfrocco Posted January 9, 2004 Share Posted January 9, 2004 Not to mention that the Cooperstown logo is almost as big as the team logo. Why they can't just put a little logo on the side, I will never understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.