CC97 Posted January 8, 2004 Posted January 8, 2004 First time I've ever seen the classic jay look like this.... --- Chris Creamer Founder/Editor, SportsLogos.Net "The Mothership" • News • Facebook • X/Twitter • Instagram
Puckguy14 Posted January 8, 2004 Posted January 8, 2004 a mix of the first two logos? 2004 San Jose Sharks 7th Man Fan of the Year San Jose Gold Miners - 4x Lombardi Cup Champions
shiznit1083 Posted January 8, 2004 Posted January 8, 2004 The logo makes up for the ugliness (is this even a word?) of the baby blue on the front. Still just the second best logo (the best IMO is still the one before the t-jay).
JQK Posted January 8, 2004 Posted January 8, 2004 I always liked that Jay the best. It has the leaf, but it wasn't overpowering in that "Branded In Canada" way the second logo was. It was a great baseball logo Stay Tuned Sports Podcast
Phil Posted January 8, 2004 Posted January 8, 2004 How did MLB themselves make such a nice logo look so bad?Are they trying to emphasize the retro feel by changing the way it actually was to this skewed and ugly looking thing?Ironically, that logo, as skewed and as bad a representation of the original logo that it is, is still better than the what the Blue Jays have now...
Cianfrocco Posted January 9, 2004 Posted January 9, 2004 Not to mention that the Cooperstown logo is almost as big as the team logo. Why they can't just put a little logo on the side, I will never understand.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.