eriqjaffe 38 Posted April 23, 2007 Finally, huh? Many huge thanks to LMUpepbander and Nick 1733 for creating the original source files...76ers:Bobcats:Bucks:Bulls:Cavaliers: 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ben5 373 Posted April 23, 2007 Wow. Awesome job guys! This day will live on forever as the day the NBA fonts became available. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eriqjaffe 38 Posted April 23, 2007 Celtics:Clippers:Grizzlies:Heat:Hornets:Jazz:Kings:Kings Alt:Knicks:Lakers:Magic:Mavericks:Mavericks Alt:Nets:Nuggets: 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KP14 0 Posted April 23, 2007 Thanks again for all the work you put into doing these fonts, they get more use then you could ever imagine. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eriqjaffe 38 Posted April 23, 2007 Pacers:Pistons:Raptors:Rockets:Spurs:Suns:SuperSonics:Timberwolves:Trailblazers:Warriors:Wizards:The link, as always, is in my sig. Enjoy! 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Unwind 149 Posted April 23, 2007 Phenomenal work, gentlemen. Many thanks. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBGKon 2,655 Posted April 23, 2007 I just realized how similar the Warriors and Wizards numbers were.Anyway, thanks a bunch! 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
meetthemets 18 Posted April 23, 2007 Dude, these are solid. Nice work. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stupidsuck 0 Posted April 23, 2007 awesome job, thanks guys! 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
slapshot 793 Posted April 23, 2007 They look good, but I see a lot of inconsistencies that should be cleaned up. For example, on the Bucks numbers, the vertical stroke of the 1 looks much thinner than the strokes on the 2 and 3.On the Hornets, the diagonal stroke of the 2 looks really thicker than it should be.The Magic numbers look disproportionately thin, but it might be because they require all the outlines to fatten them up.Just me being nitpicky. It's an extensive project which you've put in a lot of work and effort that just needs a bit of refinement. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eriqjaffe 38 Posted April 23, 2007 They look good, but I see a lot of inconsistencies that should be cleaned up. For example, on the Bucks numbers, the vertical stroke of the 1 looks much thinner than the strokes on the 2 and 3.On the Hornets, the diagonal stroke of the 2 looks really thicker than it should be.The Magic numbers look disproportionately thin, but it might be because they require all the outlines to fatten them up.Just me being nitpicky. It's an extensive project which you've put in a lot of work and effort that just needs a bit of refinement.Yeah, I'm aware of a few inconsistencies. Nick was in the process of cleaning/fixing up the files but ran into hard drive issues. I'll update the pack as fixed files come my way. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Draft Dodger 0 Posted April 23, 2007 Yeah, I'm aware of a few inconsistencies. Nick was in the process of cleaning/fixing up the files but ran into hard drive issues. I'll update the pack as fixed files come my way.slacker(inside joke, folks, nothing to see here). 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shiznit1083 35 Posted April 23, 2007 Guys, I would like to applaud you for all your work. Very well done! 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oz615 23 Posted April 23, 2007 This is truly a most joyous day here in the CCSLC,i speak for everyone and say thank you. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OB33 52 Posted April 23, 2007 Just echoing what everyone else said, fantastic work! 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eRay 362 Posted April 23, 2007 great job to all associated with this. i predict we will now see an over-abundance of nba concepts...and it will be great. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shumway 2,311 Posted April 23, 2007 For some reasont he link in your sig isn't working. Perhaps it's just me, but it says something about data transfer exceeding. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eye 61 Posted April 23, 2007 Nice job to everyone who was involved in this project. These are awesome, a great resource. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eriqjaffe 38 Posted April 23, 2007 slacker(inside joke, folks, nothing to see here).Well, I decided to release what I had, rather than make everybody wait two more days that never come. For some reasont he link in your sig isn't working. Perhaps it's just me, but it says something about data transfer exceeding.The joy of Geocities. You'll just have to try it again later on. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MVP 0 Posted April 23, 2007 YOU... ARE... A... GOD! 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites