neo_prankster Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 Because the logo for the 2012 Olympics in London has gotten such rotten responses, I give you two logo sketches for the price of one. The Fictional Story of Austus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maz Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 Theyre okay. The crown one has alotta peotentioal... but its not like London is the only city that queen lives in. All in all.... nothing can be worse than the real one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kewp80 Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 If the parliament one was more abstract it would be great. If you look at a lot of the olympic logos you see that they are pretty abstract. Cardinals -- Rams -- Blues -- Tigers -- Liverpool Check out my music! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davidson Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 theres some rule that its not supposed to contain landmarks or something?seems a bit strange to me?http://www.thelondonpaper.com/galleries/2012logos/here are some that people in london mailed into the free london eveing rag. i like number 53 personally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neo_prankster Posted June 6, 2007 Author Share Posted June 6, 2007 theres some rule that its not supposed to contain landmarks or something?seems a bit strange to me?http://www.thelondonpaper.com/galleries/2012logos/here are some that people in london mailed into the free london eveing rag. i like number 53 personally.Is there a rule against crowns? The Fictional Story of Austus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphabet Man Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 Well, Sydney had the top of the Opera House in their logo. So I don't know about this rule about landmarks. twitter.com/thebrainofMatt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmered Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 Well, Sydney had the top of the Opera House in their logo. So I don't know about this rule about landmarks.But the Opera House sails looked like the flame from the torch.Is that how they got around it? Oh, and I've got a site.Footy Jumpers Dot Com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphabet Man Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 Probably. twitter.com/thebrainofMatt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EJ_Barlik Posted June 7, 2007 Share Posted June 7, 2007 QUOTE(davidson @ Wednesday, June 6th, 2007 - 17:31:46) theres some rule that its not supposed to contain landmarks or something?seems a bit strange to me?http://www.thelondonpaper.com/galleries/2012logos/here are some that people in london mailed into the free london eveing rag. i like number 53 personally.I think #46 is pretty cool too, except then need to have four shades of color instead of just the burgundy.   5-time Defending NL East Champions  Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1_ILWT_1 Posted June 7, 2007 Share Posted June 7, 2007 its still better than vancouvers olympic logo...shoulda been a totem pole...at least that represents the west coast and BC rather than the inukshuk (sp) that is going to be used...when i see that thing...1st thing it makes me think of is northwest territories GO GIANTS GO!!!mia Marek SchwarzTHANK YOU TREVOR! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravenmaster Posted June 7, 2007 Share Posted June 7, 2007 Really, what were they thinking/smoking when they came up with that ridiculous logo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perfect Zero Posted June 7, 2007 Share Posted June 7, 2007 rotfl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearcats Posted June 7, 2007 Share Posted June 7, 2007 QUOTE(davidson @ Wednesday, June 6th, 2007 - 17:31:46) theres some rule that its not supposed to contain landmarks or something?seems a bit strange to me?http://www.thelondonpaper.com/galleries/2012logos/here are some that people in london mailed into the free london eveing rag. i like number 53 personally.I think #46 is pretty cool too, except then need to have four shades of color instead of just the burgundy.I really love #21. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DelayedPenalty Posted June 7, 2007 Share Posted June 7, 2007 WTF on #18?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayBlueshirt Posted June 7, 2007 Share Posted June 7, 2007 Best concept ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEWJ Posted June 7, 2007 Share Posted June 7, 2007 Best concept ever. hahahahahaha |Â BROWNS | BUCKEYES | CAVALIERS | INDIANSÂ | Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DelayedPenalty Posted June 7, 2007 Share Posted June 7, 2007 What? It's supposed to be Clark Kent tearing off his shirt to reveal a Superman logo His description of the picture is amazing though! Pulling together to reveal the Olympics! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AceHawk447 Posted June 10, 2007 Share Posted June 10, 2007 #s 21, 25 (save the rings discrepancy), 32, 37, 48, and 53 are my favorites... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SG30 Posted June 10, 2007 Share Posted June 10, 2007 18 all the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neo_prankster Posted June 10, 2007 Author Share Posted June 10, 2007 So I take it that nobody likes my concepts on this thread? The Fictional Story of Austus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.