jhans203 Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 I am beginning to get annoyed by all the "new" recolorization of NBA logos. I think it should be the other way around. Teams should stay with their team colors and go with a design if they so wish. Here are the recent examples.Is it that hard to redesign a logo? I would have loved to have seen a new orginial Hawks logo.I don't see this trend ending. My question is this, who's next in this recolorization phase? My money is on Sacramento, Philadelphia, and/or New Jersey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy B Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 The Bucks and Jazz recolored their logos too. I think the teams want to switch their identity entirely, but there is a $500,000 fee to make a new logo. Instead of spending the money, the teams just recolor their primary logo and make a secondary logo that they use the majority of the time. That way they can put the secondary logo on everything, basically being the new primary, but they don't have to pay the fee to change primary logos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruColor Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 Here ya go:...and: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EddieJ1984 Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 Explains why the rapters still their first primary logo.But cmon, the pistons eventually changed their logo, after having a recolored logo.I wouldnt mind if the 76ers recolored their logo, like on their alternate jersey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 It does seem to be the new trend.And not just in basketball, though that dominates - the Mets did it too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabreGuy Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 I know you're joking, Pantone, but that Lakers recolourization isn't exactly ugly.The Celtics one did make me laugh.(Edited twice, cause I can't spell "Lakers" to save my life!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DG_ThenNowForever Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 Chris Webber and Allan Houston are each making $20.7 million this year. (Yes, that Allan Houston.) Jalen Rose and Eddie Jones each made around $16 million. Brian Grant made $17 million.Since when is $500,000 a lot of money in the NBA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitedawg22 Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 Looks like Lucky's gone Hawaiian... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fonz Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 Chris Webber and Allan Houston are each making $20.7 million this year. (Yes, that Allan Houston.) Jalen Rose and Eddie Jones each made around $16 million. Brian Grant made $17 million.Since when is $500,000 a lot of money in the NBA?Very true. That's nothing to them, especially if they want to makeover their team identity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Am A Flaming Douche Bag Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 Is that Atlantas new colour set? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruColor Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 Oh - I just HAD to do this one: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabreGuy Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 Oh - I just HAD to do this one:If I stare at this for one minute, and then look at a white wall, will I see the logo in the correct colours? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrivnak Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powersurge Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 I know you're joking, Pantone, but that Lakers recolourization isn't exactly ugly.The Celtics one did make me laugh.(Edited twice, cause I can't spell "Lakers" to save my life!)Oh bite your tongue Mr. Rubble....that one is teeeeeerrrible! Looks like the Clippers (but dare I say it?)...even worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabreGuy Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 Oh bite your tongue Mr. Rubble....that one is teeeeeerrrible! Looks like the Clippers (but dare I say it?)...even worse.Yeah, looks like the Clippers... I think that's what I liked about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJM Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 My money is on Philadelphia...ditch the black! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ry Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 As a Jazz fan, I have seen them fall victim to both the navy uniforms & re-colorization trends. Honestly, I hate everything about their current look. Why they ever ditched the muscal note logo is beyond me. I am still waiting for them to pull their heads out and switch back to the purple, green, & gold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBM Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 Don't forget the Heat:And the Suns (sort of): Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Am A Flaming Douche Bag Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 Its just modernizing and another way to make money. New jersey = ppl buy them = money Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Falcon Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 Oh - I just HAD to do this one:Mr. PANTONE, please put down the Adobe Illustrator and back slooooowly away from the computer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.