Old School Fool Posted August 23, 2007 Share Posted August 23, 2007 [usual reply] YOU SUCK, THIS SUCKS, I HATE YOU, DIE.[/usual reply]It's alright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadSeed84 Posted August 23, 2007 Share Posted August 23, 2007 After looking at it more, and the updated one, no its just bad.FIrst off why the plain ass font? the twins current wordmark is great, distinctive, now you made them have a bland generic fontAlso I dont care for the silouette of the batters, it reminds me of the white sox logo from the 80s, and no that logo wasnt great.So in the end maybe if this was 1982 it would be decent, but still generic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkleton Posted August 23, 2007 Share Posted August 23, 2007 Your original logo was much cleaner than the updated one. It looks like you took a lot of time on the first try, but don't just throw together the updatd version.What's better:-No more Siamese twins attatched at the leg.-Cleaned up gray area at leg.-Home plate looks more realisticWhat's worse:-Sloppy baseball, it looks like it took 5 seconds, put more time into it.-Minnesota should be under the "win" in not over it.-The execution, it looks a lot sloppier than the originalWhat still can be improved:I think it would look better with the players standing on top of home plate. Then remove 1961, and put Minnesota under the "win" in Twins. This now leaves some empty space at the top of home plate. My first thought would be to put an interlocking TC on the top.Another suggestion if you want to keep the twins where they are on the plate would be to keep Minnesota above the Twins wordmark and get rid of the 1961 w/ baseball. Then just put a TC logo under the Twins wordmark.Take your time on another update and you've got yourself a nice concept.All of the above, done carefully and taking your time....THEN your on a winner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.