Jump to content

Chris, it's really time to eliminate the "comments" function

Gothamite

By Gothamite
in Sports Logo News

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply
timparry

timparry

Posted
Posted
fixed

See, that's the problem with the board. If you don't think like the 30-posts-a-day regulars, then you're booted. That's not even "effin-gay," just disturbing...

I've got an idea. Why don't you make us all subscribe to post, $9.95 a month. Heck, Chris, think of the revenue!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Roger Clemente

Roger Clemente

Posted
Posted
fixed

See, that's the problem with the board. If you don't think like the 30-posts-a-day regulars, then you're booted. That's not even "effin-gay," just disturbing...

You're sulking because he removed a racial slur from a logo comment? :therock:

champssig2.png
Follow me on Twitter if you care: @Animal_Clans.

My opinion may or may not be the same as yours. The choice is up to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hat Boy

Hat Boy

Posted
Posted
fixed

See, that's the problem with the board. If you don't think like the 30-posts-a-day regulars, then you're booted. That's not even "effin-gay," just disturbing...

You're sulking because he removed a racial slur from a logo comment? :therock:

Not logo comments, but logo "facts."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
powersurge

powersurge

Posted
Posted

This thread just went down a pretty dumb road.

What the hell are we arguing about? Isn't this pretty cut and dry? Don't get me wrong...I am one of the biggest proponents of free speech you'll ever meet, but using racial slurs in any manner doesn't validate that freedom.

Is this what we're arguing about?

...or am I missing an even more trivial point here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gothamite

Gothamite

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Nope, I think you're right. That's where we are. For the record, I still think he forgot a "</sarcasm>" tag.

Chris, I don't want this thread to be construed in any way as a criticism of the job you're doing. Quite the contrary. I'm just sorry that some people didn't respect you enough to refrain from putting childish and offensive drivel on your site.

The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
koizim

koizim

Posted
Posted
fixed

See, that's the problem with the board. If you don't think like the 30-posts-a-day regulars, then you're booted. That's not even "effin-gay," just disturbing...

I've got an idea. Why don't you make us all subscribe to post, $9.95 a month. Heck, Chris, think of the revenue!

If you're not kidding then I hope that you realize that what you're saying (or what it sounds like you're saying) is that it's okay to say racial slurs. I don't post "30-posts-a-day" and yet I haven't yet gotten booted or suspended (and yes I've been involved in plenty of flame wars). It's just a little thing called tact.

Engine, Engine, Number Nine, on the New York transit line,

If my train goes off the track, pick it up! Pick it up! Pick it up!

Back on the scene, crispy and clean,

You can try, but then why, 'cause you can't intervene.

We be the outcast, down for the settle. Won't play the rock, won't play the pebble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Milo Meningocele

Milo Meningocele

Posted
Posted
If you're not kidding then I hope that you realize that what you're saying(or what it sounds like you're saying) is that it's okay to say racial slurs.

Seems like you think some people can say them:

Also, when non-black people say the n-word and think it's okay because they said it with an '-a' at the end and not an '-er'. I'm black and it's not OK and, even though the reasoning really doesn't make much sense, it's our word.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
timparry

timparry

Posted
Posted

Um, first of all. I have a 160 IQ, and that's not on a scale of 1-1,000. Call me dumb again and I'll beat you in chess.

Second, I wasn't making any sort of reference to racial slurs. I just went back and checked the thread, thrice (that's three times, for those of you without a 160 IQ) and saw no reference to a racial slur. Only a bunch of people complaining to answers that were uninformed by a bunch of people none of us would call for a life line.

And third, why shouldn't Chris charge? It'll thin out the pack so so one here has to deal with the uninformed.

Sorry to have raised such a ruckus. The only sarcasm in my reply has to do with my 160 IQ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
slapshot

slapshot

Posted
Posted

So why does someone with an IQ of 160 have nothing better to do than visit a sports logos message board and complain about the way things are run? I can't remember the last time you posted anything that wasn't a rant about something.

Yet another unfortunate case of malaise of the intellectual superior. Quelle domage.

Back-to-Back Fatal Forty Champion 2015 & 2016

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gothamite

Gothamite

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Second, I wasn't making any sort of reference to racial slurs. I just went back and checked the thread, thrice (that's three times, for those of you without a 160 IQ) and saw no reference to a racial slur. Only a bunch of people complaining to answers that were uninformed by a bunch of people none of us would call for a life line.

You had better read post #22 again. Perhaps that fourth check would have helped.

An hour and a half before you called eliminating the comments "disturbing," and made a silly accusation against Chris enforcing some sort of doctrinal purity, it was revealed in this thread that one was a racial slur. The post right above yours, in fact:

The NFL 50 one said "expletivez from lincoln". Change Expletive to the n-word.

Guess that massive, massive IQ didn't exactly help your reading comprehention, eh? :P

The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
powersurge

powersurge

Posted
Posted
Um, first of all. I have a 160 IQ, and that's not on a scale of 1-1,000. Call me dumb again and I'll beat you in chess.

Second, I wasn't making any sort of reference to racial slurs. I just went back and checked the thread, thrice (that's three times, for those of you without a 160 IQ) and saw no reference to a racial slur. Only a bunch of people complaining to answers that were uninformed by a bunch of people none of us would call for a life line.

And third, why shouldn't Chris charge? It'll thin out the pack so so one here has to deal with the uninformed.

Sorry to have raised such a ruckus. The only sarcasm in my reply has to do with my 160 IQ.

Why do I find this play on words insanely funny and wonderfully nerdy at the same time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Drew22

Drew22

Posted
Posted
Um, first of all. I have a 160 IQ, and that's not on a scale of 1-1,000. Call me dumb again and I'll beat you in chess.

Second, I wasn't making any sort of reference to racial slurs. I just went back and checked the thread, thrice (that's three times, for those of you without a 160 IQ) and saw no reference to a racial slur. Only a bunch of people complaining to answers that were uninformed by a bunch of people none of us would call for a life line.

And third, why shouldn't Chris charge? It'll thin out the pack so so one here has to deal with the uninformed.

Sorry to have raised such a ruckus. The only sarcasm in my reply has to do with my 160 IQ.

Dumb.

I'll play you in chess. Lets go.

Eagles/Heels/Dawgs/Falcons/Hawks

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sec19Row53

Sec19Row53

Posted
Posted
Um, first of all. I have a 160 IQ, and that's not on a scale of 1-1,000. Call me dumb again and I'll beat you in chess.

Second, I wasn't making any sort of reference to racial slurs. I just went back and checked the thread, thrice (that's three times, for those of you without a 160 IQ) and saw no reference to a racial slur. Only a bunch of people complaining to answers that were uninformed by a bunch of people none of us would call for a life line.

And third, why shouldn't Chris charge? It'll thin out the pack so so one here has to deal with the uninformed.

Sorry to have raised such a ruckus. The only sarcasm in my reply has to do with my 160 IQ.

Dumb.

I'll play you in chess. Lets go.

No, I want to play Global Thermonuclear War.

It's where I sit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
maz

maz

Posted
Posted
Um, first of all. I have a 160 IQ, and that's not on a scale of 1-1,000. Call me dumb again and I'll beat you in chess.

Second, I wasn't making any sort of reference to racial slurs. I just went back and checked the thread, thrice (that's three times, for those of you without a 160 IQ) and saw no reference to a racial slur. Only a bunch of people complaining to answers that were uninformed by a bunch of people none of us would call for a life line.

And third, why shouldn't Chris charge? It'll thin out the pack so so one here has to deal with the uninformed.

Sorry to have raised such a ruckus. The only sarcasm in my reply has to do with my 160 IQ.

Dumb.

I'll play you in chess. Lets go.

No, I want to play Global Thermonuclear War.

Now, you remember what happened last time... however, if you could change my grades to that'd be awesome.

oBIgzrL.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sec19Row53

Sec19Row53

Posted
Posted
Um, first of all. I have a 160 IQ, and that's not on a scale of 1-1,000. Call me dumb again and I'll beat you in chess.

Second, I wasn't making any sort of reference to racial slurs. I just went back and checked the thread, thrice (that's three times, for those of you without a 160 IQ) and saw no reference to a racial slur. Only a bunch of people complaining to answers that were uninformed by a bunch of people none of us would call for a life line.

And third, why shouldn't Chris charge? It'll thin out the pack so so one here has to deal with the uninformed.

Sorry to have raised such a ruckus. The only sarcasm in my reply has to do with my 160 IQ.

Dumb.

I'll play you in chess. Lets go.

No, I want to play Global Thermonuclear War.

Now, you remember what happened last time... however, if you could change my grades to that'd be awesome.

You gave me a D?

Just kidding - I gave you an A.

Oh. Okay!

It's where I sit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
timparry

timparry

Posted
Posted

Ah, I see. It's Ok for YOU guys to use sarcasm, but I use it in an apology? And I get slammed.

I provided a legit suggestion. Make this think pay for play so losers like me don't come on and rant. This way you guys can have your little cyber circle jerk to yourself. And Chris doesn't have to keep relying on donors.

Instead you call me racist, then you don't understand sarcasm. [mod edit: removed]

Nuff said, Next thread...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept