Shumway Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Well, I'm late to the party, but I'll go through each, with a 0-10 scale:Atlanta- 0.5...it just doesn't make sense. They push the light blue, and then don't use it at all on the alt. Plus, it's just ugly as hell.Boston- 8...the lack of hem stripes keeps it from being a 9. I like it, regardlessBuffalo- 8.5....I like the jersey a lot, but it's nothing new(not that I wanted them to do anything new)Carolina- 5...Meh, more black for the sake of black. I don't like the flag as a crest either. Chicago- 9...similar to BuffaloDallas- 6...it's an unnecessary jersey, yes, but as far as design goes, I sorta like it. It's simple(and a tad boring)Edmonton- 8...it's an ugly jersey, but it's a classic jersey.LA- 7.5....I'm sure it'll grow on me, but I'm not entirely feeling it at the moment. I'd rather see a throwback(maybe the old yellow one) than a faux-back.Isles- 8...I actually prefer the old Isles jerseys right before the RBk Edge movement, but these are nice...better than the currents.Philadelphia- 9....I hate the Flyers, love these jerseys. The white nameplate is my favorite part.Phoenix- 3...I hated them, then hated them more when I saw the maroon pants. The 4 points came from the logo, as I do like thatPittsburgh- 9....I've had this jersey for 5 years now, and it's still among my favorites. Pittsburgh could have a whole slew of throwbacks that'd be great(minus the gradient-robo-pigeoned ones from the late 90s.early 2000s)Ottawa- 2...it honestly looks like it belongs in a "my first concept" thread on here.San Jose- 7.5...I'd like to see some hem-striping, but these are nice. They need to ditch the orange from their uniforms, as BucFan mentioned.Tampa- 3...points go to the blue jersey, and that's it. I've never even heard them referred to as the Bolts.Toronto- 8.5....they were one of the better alts before the Edge movement, and they still are. St. Louis- 6.5..These are growing on me, although i think the logo could've been done betterVancouver- 0...yes, a zero. I like the jersey, but I'm taking away any points for changing an old logo. It's pointless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkrdevil Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Is it just me or do the buffalo and the tampa bay alternate jerseys have the same basic template?The only similarity is the side silver piping. The stripes on the two jersey's are completely different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neon_Matrix Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Is it just me or do the buffalo and the tampa bay alternate jerseys have the same basic template?The only similarity is the side silver piping. The stripes on the two jersey's are completely different.It is closer to the Calgary jersey, eh? Because Korbyn Is Colour Blind, My Signature Is Now Idiot Proof - Thanks Again Braden!!Go Leafs Go! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy B Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Here comes my final gradings:Atlanta B+ No consistency within the three uniforms, I like the shoulder logos but not the huge white patchesBoston B- Too much black, no hem stipes. The logo is good but not good enough to make up for a bland jerseyBuffalo A- I like the navy blue better than royal, only bad thing is the side piping and it's not too badCarolina B- I don't mind the black but I like the primary crest better and the shoulder logos are worthless being blackChicago B+ The jersey is boring when watching on TV, but still a solid jersey and looks great up closeDallas B Should have been green, but on it's own I like the designEdmonton C I don't care how classic it is, the royal and orange are too bright, orange numbers don't helpLos Angeles A I love the design, crest isn't great, but I don't think it's badNew York B Similar to Edmonton, but not as bad. The numbers make a big difference, plus no orange yokePhiladelphia A These should be the primaries, I don't like the white nameplates but the rest of the jersey is greatPhoenix D Bad logo, maroon areas don't make sense, but the maroon helmets and pants kill itPittsburgh A There's a reason this is on my Christmas list, everything about this is goodOttawa D I bet it looks terrible on TV, script is nice but it shouldn't say 'Sens'San Jose C+ Looks good up close but boring on the ice, should have hem stipes and some orangeTampa Bay B Everything is good except for the script 'Bolts'. Would look great with the normal logoToronto A Classic jersey that still looks greatSt. Louis B- Haven't seen them in action, but a little more yellow or royal would be nice, and the circle takes away from the new logoVancouver C+ It's pretty much the same as the normal jerseys with bad logo that has been made worse in the redesignThat puts the league average at a little above a B- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sport Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Again, why put "Bolts" on your jersey when your official nickname is "lightning". I know it's a nickname of a nickname, but it would be like the Cleveland Indians wearing jersey that read "Tribe" across the front. Are you the Tampa Bay Lightning or the Tampa Bay Bolts? If you asked the organization they would tell you they're the Tampa Bay Lightning and would thus answer the question. Leave it to the fans in the stands to give you a short nickname, but don't officialize it by putting it on the front of the jersey. That's a gear-grinder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBGKon Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Well, I'm late to the party, but I'll go through each, with a 0-10 scale:Atlanta- 0.5...it just doesn't make sense. They push the light blue, and then don't use it at all on the alt. Plus, it's just ugly as hell.Boston- 8...the lack of hem stripes keeps it from being a 9. I like it, regardlessBuffalo- 8.5....I like the jersey a lot, but it's nothing new(not that I wanted them to do anything new)Carolina- 5...Meh, more black for the sake of black. I don't like the flag as a crest either. Chicago- 9...similar to BuffaloDallas- 6...it's an unnecessary jersey, yes, but as far as design goes, I sorta like it. It's simple(and a tad boring)Edmonton- 8...it's an ugly jersey, but it's a classic jersey.LA- 7.5....I'm sure it'll grow on me, but I'm not entirely feeling it at the moment. I'd rather see a throwback(maybe the old yellow one) than a faux-back.Isles- 8...I actually prefer the old Isles jerseys right before the RBk Edge movement, but these are nice...better than the currents.Philadelphia- 9....I hate the Flyers, love these jerseys. The white nameplate is my favorite part.Phoenix- 3...I hated them, then hated them more when I saw the maroon pants. The 4 points came from the logo, as I do like thatPittsburgh- 9....I've had this jersey for 5 years now, and it's still among my favorites. Pittsburgh could have a whole slew of throwbacks that'd be great(minus the gradient-robo-pigeoned ones from the late 90s.early 2000s)Ottawa- 2...it honestly looks like it belongs in a "my first concept" thread on here.San Jose- 7.5...I'd like to see some hem-striping, but these are nice. They need to ditch the orange from their uniforms, as BucFan mentioned.Tampa- 3...points go to the blue jersey, and that's it. I've never even heard them referred to as the Bolts.Toronto- 8.5....they were one of the better alts before the Edge movement, and they still are. St. Louis- 6.5..These are growing on me, although i think the logo could've been done betterVancouver- 0...yes, a zero. I like the jersey, but I'm taking away any points for changing an old logo. It's pointless.Come to Tampa and trust me you'll hear it. I mostly refer to them in talking as the Bolts.Again, why put "Bolts" on your jersey when your official nickname is "lightning". I know it's a nickname of a nickname, but it would be like the Cleveland Indians wearing jersey that read "Tribe" across the front. Are you the Tampa Bay Lightning or the Tampa Bay Bolts? If you asked the organization they would tell you they're the Tampa Bay Lightning and would thus answer the question. Leave it to the fans in the stands to give you a short nickname, but don't officialize it by putting it on the front of the jersey. That's a gear-grinder.Exhibit A: The Arizona Diamondbacks with "D-Backs"on their unis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sport Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Come to Tampa and trust me you'll hear it. I mostly refer to them in talking as the Bolts.Again, why put "Bolts" on your jersey when your official nickname is "lightning". I know it's a nickname of a nickname, but it would be like the Cleveland Indians wearing jersey that read "Tribe" across the front. Are you the Tampa Bay Lightning or the Tampa Bay Bolts? If you asked the organization they would tell you they're the Tampa Bay Lightning and would thus answer the question. Leave it to the fans in the stands to give you a short nickname, but don't officialize it by putting it on the front of the jersey. That's a gear-grinder.Exhibit A: The Arizona Diamondbacks with "D-Backs"on their unis.I knew someone would bring something like this up. In my eyes, it's not the same. D-Backs or Jays or Cards or Pats are all shortened versions of the team's nickname, not a completely different word. I know the fans say "Bolts" we're not disputing that, but it's not their official nickname. Every Indians fan I know calls them "The Tribe", but you will never see the team wearing a third jersey that says "TRIBE". It's sort of like when a college basketball team takes the nickname of the arena as in "the pit" or "the barn" or "the convo" and then paints it on the floor. To me it's cooler when the gym's nickname only exists verbally and in the minds of the students and the fans and the alumni. To "officialize" it by telling everyone what it's called on the floor cheapens the in-the-know appeal of the whole thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MVP Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 I'm just glad the Leafs didn't put a diagonal "BUDS" on the front of their thirds... that would suck terribly. However, by the looks things, I wouldn't be at all surprised if that was one of the designs proposed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twi Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 I don't like the new socks on the Tampa 3rds. You can hardly see the blue on tv, even HD. I don't think the regular home ones would work either. Socks need to be predominantly blue, imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corvus Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 I want to like the new Kings jerseys, but something about them is off. It feels like the Crown logo was shrunk too much and the LA is too large in relation. A more traditional hem stripe or thicker version of the hem stripe they have would have been perfect IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Canada Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 http://bruins.nhl.comBoston unveils their thirds. Basically the same thing we've saw (the "Boston" bear logo on front, tri-stripe on arms, no stripes on hemline).So now, all the thirds have been unveiled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedy Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 http://bruins.nhl.comBoston unveils their thirds. Basically the same thing we've saw (the "Boston" bear logo on front, tri-stripe on arms, no stripes on hemline).So now, all the thirds have been unveiled.The Bruins missed a prime opportunity to go back to these babies (gold sweater)..With all the things the B's did right on their primaries, they did wrong on the alternate. That Bear logo, no matter how beautiful just doesn't work for the crest. And the no hem stripes, c'mon, this isn't Toronto. I'm going to have to pass on these, piss poor effort Boston.And while I'm here, since all the 3rd's have been released, when the hell is EA gunna release the code? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAFKAK Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Dallas B Should have been green, but on it's own I like the designVancouver C+ It's pretty much the same as the normal jerseys with bad logo that has been made worse in the redesignTid bit hypocritical now aren't we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAFKAK Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Double post... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wheateater Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Dallas B Should have been green, but on it's own I like the designVancouver C+ It's pretty much the same as the normal jerseys with bad logo that has been made worse in the redesignTid bit hypocritical now aren't we?Dallas B Should have been green, but on it's own I like the designVancouver C+ It's pretty much the same as the normal jerseys with bad logo that has been made worse in the redesignTid bit hypocritical now aren't we?Tad bit redundant now, aren't we? FWIW, I think his beef is with the Canucks' using an updated old logo while Dallas didn't bother. You can't get a bad mark if you don't try, it seems. Wagner Athletic Group11-2 Saskatoon Steeds (WAFL)-NFL-2014 Western Conference Champions / 8-5 Calgary Pronghorns (TNFF)-CFL-2014 Confederation Cup XI Champions14-6-2 Saskatoon Yellowheads (XHL)-NHL-1st, Gretzky Conference / 5-4-0 Saskatoon Czars (MLH)-AHL-T2nd, Calder Conference7-1-6 VfL Dortmund (Weltliga)-Bundesliga-3rd, League / 5-1-5 West End AFC (WFL)-EPL-T5th, League14-7 Saskatoon Sheiks (AA)-MLB-2014 Founder's Cup Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAFKAK Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Dallas B Should have been green, but on it's own I like the designVancouver C+ It's pretty much the same as the normal jerseys with bad logo that has been made worse in the redesignTid bit hypocritical now aren't we?Dallas B Should have been green, but on it's own I like the designVancouver C+ It's pretty much the same as the normal jerseys with bad logo that has been made worse in the redesignTid bit hypocritical now aren't we?Tad bit redundant now, aren't we? FWIW, I think his beef is with the Canucks' using an updated old logo while Dallas didn't bother. You can't get a bad mark if you don't try, it seems.While I agree whole-heartedly that both are redundant, at least the 'Nucks used some new marks to distinguish their 3rd instead of just throwing their city across the front with numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Showtime029 Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 I think the Bruins alternate would have certainly looked better with the bottom striping and a tie at the collar, but I really do like the logo. I would say a middle of the pack 3rd. Here is a link to the "Edge" template. I thought it was pretty sweet. http://bruins.nhl.com/ext/pdfs/112008/1124j.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maz Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Pittsburgh- 9....I've had this jersey for 5 years now, and it's still among my favorites. Pittsburgh could have a whole slew of throwbacks that'd be great(minus the gradient-robo-pigeoned ones from the late 90s.early 2000s)Just got an idea.Each year the pens use an old jersey from their past, and use fan voting to decide it each year. They do this for about 5 years, then come out with a bitchin' all new overall redesign. Everything except the colors (though a change back to the old gold is possible) and logo are changed. Theyll make alot of money in sales, fans get to see some favorite jerseys of thiers ressurected, and other fans are exposed to a great set they may not have seen before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy B Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Dallas B Should have been green, but on it's own I like the designVancouver C+ It's pretty much the same as the normal jerseys with bad logo that has been made worse in the redesignTid bit hypocritical now aren't we?Not really. Both are pretty much the same as the primary jersey. But on their own I like the Dallas design and don't like the Canucks. I graded those based on their design, how is that hypocritical? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spartacat_12 Posted November 25, 2008 Share Posted November 25, 2008 Does anyone know when the codes for NHL 09 will be released? I'm assuming that it will be some time this week since all of the thirds have been released officially. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.