epper Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 annnnd baldelli takes nomar's #5. they may as well go ahead and place him on the 60-Day DL now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wally1912 Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 Here are the Boston Blue Sox in action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayJaxon Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 I just knew they were gonna screw it up somehow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Still MIGHTY Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 Colored unis for the Red Sox just look so... Spring Training or batting practice to me. At least these.Not a big fan | ANA | LAA | LAR | LAL | ASU | CSULB | USMNT | USWNT | LAFC | OCSC | MAN UTD | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalktoChuck Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 Colored unis for the Red Sox just look so... Spring Training or batting practice to me. At least these.Not a big fanI agree. BP was the first thing that came to my mind.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fjm Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 Wait...the Red Sox are actually wearing navy blue socks on the road? That is horrendous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedy Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 Those flat out suck. They don't even deserve any intelligent criticism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowld Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 anxious to see their new roads today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueYankee26 Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 Aren't they supposed to be the RED Sox, not Blue Sox? Don't like how the Blue dominated their alt road unis they wore yesterday. trueyankee26.wordpress.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayBlueshirt Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 Not a fan of the blue alternates, but I must say I do dig the alternate hat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddball Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 Looking at the new road uni's, I'm talking the grey ones, they absolutely blow the old ones out of the water. Seeing Brad Penny wearing them with the high socks, it's a nice, clean classic look. A+ to them and I was one of the people who doubted and king of hated the new look, but it's just a nice classic baseball look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkrdevil Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 They look like the Yankees with all the navy blue. There was nothing wrong with the old Red Sox uniforms. They had a classic baseball look that also set them apart from the long standing look of their main rivals. Quite simply what they had before was better. I said it then and say it now, these new uniform screams of cash grab. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vmd9 Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 They look like the Yankees with all the navy blue. There was nothing wrong with the old Red Sox uniforms. They had a classic baseball look that also set them apart from the long standing look of their main rivals. Quite simply what they had before was better. I said it then and say it now, these new uniform screams of cash grab.Haha next year they should change their homes too. Make the script and numbers all blue, no red outlines, blue sicks, and use pinstipes!!and to be fair about the blue socks, the Chicago white sox do wear black ones... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewG70 Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 Here are the Boston Blue Sox in action.They're just honoring their former New York-Penn League affiliate, the Utica Blue Sox. The (unofficial) NHL Uniform DatabaseThe WHA Uniform Database Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philly97flyer Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 It looks stupid. The whole away uniform looks like a one-day throwback. I dont mind the look, but at least use Red socks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 Logos DO NOT belong on game hats. It looks bush league. The only possible exception I can think of is Toronto, back when they had the iconic blue jay logo. In every other case, it sucks. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintsfan Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 Logos DO NOT belong on game hats. It looks bush league. The only possible exception I can think of is Toronto, back when they had the iconic blue jay logo. In every other case, it sucks.I fully agree. Especially when the logo is a pair of socks. Other than that I don't actrually mind the blue Red Sox uni (save the lack of red socks on there feet!) 2011/12 WFL Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neon_Matrix Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 Logos DO NOT belong on game hats. It looks bush league. The only possible exception I can think of is Toronto, back when they had the iconic blue jay logo. In every other case, it sucks.What about the bird on the O's cap? Or the old Devil Rays logo? How about the old Brewers or Seattle alt? Because Korbyn Is Colour Blind, My Signature Is Now Idiot Proof - Thanks Again Braden!!Go Leafs Go! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 Logos DO NOT belong on game hats. It looks bush league. The only possible exception I can think of is Toronto, back when they had the iconic blue jay logo. In every other case, it sucks.What about the bird on the O's cap? Or the old Devil Rays logo? How about the old Brewers or Seattle alt?O's gets a pass, but basically only because they've never worn a monogram in my lifetime (no, the stupid "O's" caps don't count.)The Devil Rays alt caps that only had the ray were ridiculous. At least their other caps always had the TB with the ray. I'm not a fan of the BIG, but at least it technically was letters (yeah I know, it was their logo too.) The Seattle alt looked like a BP or fashion cap. Not an on-field MLB level cap.So basically I'm exempting Toronto and Baltimore from this rule. Any other requests for exemptions will be heard and ruled upon in the order in which they are received. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neon_Matrix Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 Logos DO NOT belong on game hats. It looks bush league. The only possible exception I can think of is Toronto, back when they had the iconic blue jay logo. In every other case, it sucks.What about the bird on the O's cap? Or the old Devil Rays logo? How about the old Brewers or Seattle alt?O's gets a pass, but basically only because they've never worn a monogram in my lifetime (no, the stupid "O's" caps don't count.)The Devil Rays alt caps that only had the ray were ridiculous. At least their other caps always had the TB with the ray. I'm not a fan of the BIG, but at least it technically was letters (yeah I know, it was their logo too.) The Seattle alt looked like a BP or fashion cap. Not an on-field MLB level cap.So basically I'm exempting Toronto and Baltimore from this rule. Any other requests for exemptions will be heard and ruled upon in the order in which they are received.Ok... how about Houston's and Cleveland's caps? They also just have logos... Because Korbyn Is Colour Blind, My Signature Is Now Idiot Proof - Thanks Again Braden!!Go Leafs Go! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.