meetthemets Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 Let the bashing begin. Awful... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KJTALBOT Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 SPECTACULAR!I really like it. Simple. Gets the job done. Perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMU Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 SPECTACULAR!I really like it. Simple. Gets the job done. Perfect.Agreed. No complaints on my end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thad Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 It's simple, you can tell it's at the Rose Bowl, and the sponsor doesn't overwhelm the logo. I like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fiasco! Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 Agreed. It's a really nice logo. Retains the classiness of the Rose Bowl, and doesn't bash you over the head with the Citi logo. Great job to whoever designed this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slapshot Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 It's simple and clean. I'm not a fan of the choice of fonts used, and for some reason it doesn't look lined up correctly, but it's better than a lot of bowl logos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyk Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 Wow, a descent logo with the Citi sponsor. Now can we fix the Citi Field patch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian E Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 just for the record, i'm waiting for people to start bashing citi for sponsoring the 2010 national championship, considering all the flack the mets caught for still having citi as their naming rights partner. if it's a citi issue, we should be consistent. maybe we can have two more politians urge this time for "citi/the taxpayers of the u.s. present the 2010 bcs national championship game." i'm just sayin'.although, i must say, if the OTHER logo citi was involved in was this classy, the mets may not be so easy to gang up on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASU Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 Looks good! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrySmalls Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 It's simple, you can tell it's at the Rose Bowl, and the sponsor doesn't overwhelm the logo. I like it.That is, if the sponsor will still be around by then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milo Meningocele Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 I agree that they did a great job minimizing the Citi presence. But the rest of the text doesn't seem to match the style of the Citi football. It looks very dated, very "late 80's sweatshirt", if you know what I'm trying to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epiphanic Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 There are a few defects; the flatness of the top part of the football is the most egregious to my eyes. There's nothing "awful" about it. It's a nice logo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 There are a few defects; the flatness of the top part of the football is the most egregious to my eyes. There's nothing "awful" about it. It's a nice logo.Agreed on both points. If anything, it seems a little subdued - I would have expected that the word "CHAMPIONSHIP" would be given more prominence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joshawaggie Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 It's not a bad logo, but I just don't like the use of all the blue for some reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meetthemets Posted January 13, 2009 Author Share Posted January 13, 2009 There are a few defects; the flatness of the top part of the football is the most egregious to my eyes. There's nothing "awful" about it. It's a nice logo.Just seems very uninspired to me. Typical Copperplate font with a banner. The football is ugly and the black borders are uneven. I think there are members of this board who could have done a much better job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yac12 Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 Get rid of the football and place Citi over the mountains (I think that is what the blue is) and all would be good. IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 The football seems elongated, but that's about it.Also, Citi sponsors the Rose Bowl Game. Perhaps that's related to why they're sponsoring this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueYankee26 Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 Awesome work! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slickster Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 The football seems elongated, but that's about it.Also, Citi sponsors the Rose Bowl Game. Perhaps that's related to why they're sponsoring this?Right. Wherever the BCS Championship game is, it is sponsored by the corresponding BCS bowl. That's why FedEx sponsored the 2009 game (held in Miami, home of the FedEx Orange Bowl). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arts11 Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 I agree that they did a great job minimizing the Citi presence. But the rest of the text doesn't seem to match the style of the Citi football. It looks very dated, very "late 80's sweatshirt", if you know what I'm trying to say.Agreed. It just seems very "quiet." It doesn't really stand out, nor does it really have any "presence," esp. considering it's supposed to be for the championship game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.