sports-rings.com Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 The Broncos Three Headed Super Bowl Ring, shown below, Ain’t Happening Nice photoshop work, and an interesting idea, but don’t expect Jostens to design a Broncos Super Bowl 50 ring like this (see below) This photoshopped proposed Super Bowl 50 ring made the rounds recently on Twitter. While Jostens is now hard at work coming up with possible designs and showing them to the Broncos executives, my predation is you won’t see any three diamond-filled Bronco logos on the next championship ring. In recent years, the trend for Super Bowl rings has been to place multiple Lombardi trophies on the ring. In the Broncos Super Bowl 50 ring, that would mean three marques diamonds, one for each trophy. The Broncos first Super Bowl ring did have a beautiful diamond horse-head logo, and their second Super Bowl ring a year later contained two horse-head logos to signify their second World championship. To see the designs of the Broncos first two Super Bowl rings, and their many AFC championship rings, please visit my Super Bowl ring gallery. A link to the gallery can be found on the top of my home page. Besides running out of room on the ring, three Horse-head logos look too busy and somehow would probably get lost on the championship ring. Hopefully the Super Bowl 50 ring will be made in yellow gold – to match Denver’s previous two Super Bowl rings and to pay tribute to the Golden anniversary the NFL just celebrated. What do the members here think of this ring and any ideas for the design of the new Super Bowl 50 ring? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karlsgems Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 13 hours ago, sports-rings.com said: This photoshopped proposed Super Bowl 50 ring made the rounds recently on Twitter. OMG that is horrible. Agreed---- that is NOT happening. Mike you're right, recent trends have been to have the team logo surrounded by trophies (Pats last year are perfect example and even arguably Green Bay in 2010). You can bet it will be big and it will probably even be yellow gold. Beyond that, it's hard to say. You never know how the players feel and what they want, plus are they going to have any imagination or are they going to reconstitute the Patriots design from the year before. Personally, I can't wait to see what they come up with. They have historically designed some nice rings. Their first super bowl ring wasn't their fault, that was just crappy execution by Diamond Cutters. At least they got it straightened out the following year with Jostens! Fingers crossed! Karl. Quote A part owner of the Green Bay Packers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 I find that to be pretty disappointing, actually. The horse heads should be their thing on Super Bowl rings, IMO. As for the whole, "What about when they have so many championships that they cant fit any more horse heads?!" argument? Well, that sounds like a pretty good problem to have, right? 1 Quote On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UHCollector Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 I like the look of the single and double Bronco rings because the team won back to back Super Bowls. The second ring is like a sequel or a continuation of the design from the previous year so it makes sense. However, a three Bronco ring looks cluttered and I think the team should go with a design that stands on its own. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sports-rings.com Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 On 2/27/2016 at 11:06 PM, UHCollector said: I like the look of the single and double Bronco rings because the team won back to back Super Bowls. The second ring is like a sequel or a continuation of the design from the previous year so it makes sense. However, a three Bronco ring looks cluttered and I think the team should go with a design that stands on its own. I agree totally. Except for the head coach and Elway, and perhaps a couple of other coaches and staff the team has been completely turned over since their last super bowl victories. Time for a new theme as we have seen some teams do that have not won for a while (yet the Raiders stay very consistent over the decades which is very cool too) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sports-rings.com Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Jostens Shows Off Their Amazing Super Bowl Rings Over the last few years, Jostens and Tiffany have designed and manufactured all the recent Super Bowl rings. shown below are the last three Jostens Super Bowl rings. While Tiffany has made the last two Giant Super Bowl rings and they also manufactured the winning Seahawks and Saints rings, Jostens continues to outshine them. The three Super Bowl rings below were all designed and made by Jostens. They have made more Super Bowl rings than any other manufacturer, yet Tiffany has done their fair share of Super Bowl rings over the last decade too. While I find the Tiffany Super Bowl rings to be gorgeous, in my opinion, their NFC championship rings have been lacking. And while those Tiffany Super Bowl rings are glorious, in my humble opinion, I believe the Jostens Super Bowl rings are even better. The three Super Bowl rings from left to right are the Packers 2010 Super Bowl ring, the Ravens 2012 Super Bowl ring, and the Patriots 2014 Super Bowl ring. The Packers championship ring is the only Super Bowl ring made of solid platinum, not gold, and the Ravens ring is larger (but not heavier, due to the fact that gold weighs less than platinum). The huge championship ring on the right is the Patriots Super Bowl XLIX ring and it’s the largest Super Bowl ring ever designed. Remember the Patriots championship ring in the above photograph is further away from the camera so it would appear even larger if the three rings were shown at the same distance from left to right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ridenlow71 Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Espn showing what 12 straight big 12 titles looks like for Kansas. Quote Part owner in the Green Bay Packers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Here's a rough concept that's been floating around. Gold dominated, which goes along well with the SB50 theme. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sports-rings.com Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 I don't think that ring has a chance... it's not a shape we have ever seen Jostens before, and the four tiny diamonds on top would seem odd (especially since they only won three super bowls) also, the ring is too similar to their first ring, and there's no tribute to the three championships they won. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sports-rings.com Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 Anyone want to talk about the design of the rings from Super Bowl XXXIII? The Falcons ring show a great deal of bling for an NFC championship ring, and the Bronco ring is one of the nicest Super Bowl rings ever made! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UHCollector Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 The latest addition to my collection, a 2006 C-USA Football Championship Ring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sports-rings.com Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 8 hours ago, UHCollector said: The latest addition to my collection, a 2006 C-USA Football Championship Ring. Congratulations, a beautiful ring! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sports-rings.com Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 The photo below was recently tweeted and helped me realize some significant things regarding design trends in recent Super Bowl rings. The photo was taken at the NFL Headquarters, located on Park Avenue in New York City. As I have written about many times, you can’t walk in off the street, get in the elevator and go to lobby of the NFL. Security is incredibly tight and you must be invited to the NFL headquarters to visit. Once in the lobby of their offices, you can see the most amazing display of Super Bowl rings known to man. Every single winning Super Bowl ring is displayed (actually they’re salesman samples but close enough). Here’s what the photo reveals: 1) Although Tiffany and Company has made plenty of recent Super Bowl rings, including the Giants last two, the Saints only one, and the Seahawks only one, Tiffany is losing momentum. I say that because as the photo shows, Jostens has made the last two of the three Super Bowl rings (they made the Pats and Ravens Super Bowl rings shown above, and Tiffany manufactured the Seahawks ring). And, keep in the mind that the Broncos have already selected Jostens to make their new 2015 Bronco Super Bowl ring. 2) In my humble opinion, the two Jostens Super Bowl rings shown are much nicer in design and implementation than the Seahawks ring. 3) The final revelation in the photo is that Patriots ring is so much larger and massive than any other Super Bowl ring ever produced. It’s quite evident as you can compare the last three Super Bowl rings. Any thoughts on these rings? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ridenlow71 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 10 hours ago, sports-rings.com said: The photo below was recently tweeted and helped me realize some significant things regarding design trends in recent Super Bowl rings. The photo was taken at the NFL Headquarters, located on Park Avenue in New York City. As I have written about many times, you can’t walk in off the street, get in the elevator and go to lobby of the NFL. Security is incredibly tight and you must be invited to the NFL headquarters to visit. Once in the lobby of their offices, you can see the most amazing display of Super Bowl rings known to man. Every single winning Super Bowl ring is displayed (actually they’re salesman samples but close enough). Here’s what the photo reveals: 1) Although Tiffany and Company has made plenty of recent Super Bowl rings, including the Giants last two, the Saints only one, and the Seahawks only one, Tiffany is losing momentum. I say that because as the photo shows, Jostens has made the last two of the three Super Bowl rings (they made the Pats and Ravens Super Bowl rings shown above, and Tiffany manufactured the Seahawks ring). And, keep in the mind that the Broncos have already selected Jostens to make their new 2015 Bronco Super Bowl ring. 2) In my humble opinion, the two Jostens Super Bowl rings shown are much nicer in design and implementation than the Seahawks ring. 3) The final revelation in the photo is that Patriots ring is so much larger and massive than any other Super Bowl ring ever produced. It’s quite evident as you can compare the last three Super Bowl rings. Any thoughts on these rings? I think Tiffany did a great job on the last Giants ring and Saints ring but yeah the last two rings for the Seahawks were disappointing. Quote Part owner in the Green Bay Packers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravens12 Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 On March 7, 2016 at 4:00 AM, sports-rings.com said: The photo below was recently tweeted and helped me realize some significant things regarding design trends in recent Super Bowl rings. The photo was taken at the NFL Headquarters, located on Park Avenue in New York City. As I have written about many times, you can’t walk in off the street, get in the elevator and go to lobby of the NFL. Security is incredibly tight and you must be invited to the NFL headquarters to visit. Once in the lobby of their offices, you can see the most amazing display of Super Bowl rings known to man. Every single winning Super Bowl ring is displayed (actually they’re salesman samples but close enough). Here’s what the photo reveals: 1) Although Tiffany and Company has made plenty of recent Super Bowl rings, including the Giants last two, the Saints only one, and the Seahawks only one, Tiffany is losing momentum. I say that because as the photo shows, Jostens has made the last two of the three Super Bowl rings (they made the Pats and Ravens Super Bowl rings shown above, and Tiffany manufactured the Seahawks ring). And, keep in the mind that the Broncos have already selected Jostens to make their new 2015 Bronco Super Bowl ring. 2) In my humble opinion, the two Jostens Super Bowl rings shown are much nicer in design and implementation than the Seahawks ring. 3) The final revelation in the photo is that Patriots ring is so much larger and massive than any other Super Bowl ring ever produced. It’s quite evident as you can compare the last three Super Bowl rings. Any thoughts on these rings? My take is that Tiffany makes rings that can be worn on a regular basis by the players and that the Jostens rings are too big to be worn and are essentially trophies. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ridenlow71 Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 Looks like someone designed their own ring for the Broncos. Quote Part owner in the Green Bay Packers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UHCollector Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 High quality? I wonder how close that is to the actual design. Three Lombardi Trophies and a Bronco Head seems like a safe bet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravens12 Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 My favorite NY Mets ring from the 1960's. Great design with the NY skyline on the front and the Mr. Met and Shea Stadium on the shanks. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ridenlow71 Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 That is pretty cool Raven, what was that ring given out for? Quote Part owner in the Green Bay Packers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravens12 Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 2 hours ago, ridenlow71 said: That is pretty cool Raven, what was that ring given out for? Not 100% sure as only a few have surfaced over the years including one that belonged to Casey Stengel, the Mets first manager. They were given out by Mets ownership. It's made by Balfour and is 10k gold with real diamond and rubies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.