knox Posted August 26, 2009 Share Posted August 26, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEAD! Posted August 26, 2009 Share Posted August 26, 2009 If JJ's goal was to build a monument to crass consumerist excess while reinforcing the idea of Texan boorishness then mission accomplished.I wanna make a concept for a team called "the Texas Boorishness." The only question is which sport.What about the Texas Barrishes? I saw, I came, I left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted August 26, 2009 Share Posted August 26, 2009 I thought he was from Philly. ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Falcon Posted August 26, 2009 Share Posted August 26, 2009 I'm just wondering if Cowboys fans will FINALLY notice that the blue on the white uniforms doesn't match the blue on the dark uniforms, or the new field. Nor do the pants worn with the white jersey match the silver of the field:"Hey, dadgummit! That there blue don't look right to me. That's dirty pool!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruColor Posted August 26, 2009 Author Share Posted August 26, 2009 I'm just wondering if Cowboys fans will FINALLY notice that the blue on the white uniforms doesn't match the blue on the dark uniforms, or the new field. Nor do the pants worn with the white jersey match the silver of the field:"Hey, dadgummit! That there blue don't look right to me. That's dirty pool!"And the helmet Silver doesn't match either one of them.Neato. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DallasSports Posted August 26, 2009 Share Posted August 26, 2009 I'm just wondering if Cowboys fans will FINALLY notice that the blue on the white uniforms doesn't match the blue on the dark uniforms, or the new field. Nor do the pants worn with the white jersey match the silver of the field:"Hey, dadgummit! That there blue don't look right to me. That's dirty pool!"Is everyone on here a stereotypist? The NFL's requirement was 85 feet. The scoreboard is 90 feet. This is NFL's fault, not Cowboys. They followed the rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmhtfld Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 I'm just wondering if Cowboys fans will FINALLY notice that the blue on the white uniforms doesn't match the blue on the dark uniforms, or the new field. Nor do the pants worn with the white jersey match the silver of the field:"Hey, dadgummit! That there blue don't look right to me. That's dirty pool!"Is everyone on here a stereotypist? The NFL's requirement was 85 feet. The scoreboard is 90 feet. This is NFL's fault, not Cowboys. They followed the rules.actually it is the NFLs fault for not modernizing their regulationsthe NFL should have to pay the full price to raise it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 I'm just wondering if Cowboys fans will FINALLY notice that the blue on the white uniforms doesn't match the blue on the dark uniforms, or the new field. Nor do the pants worn with the white jersey match the silver of the field:"Hey, dadgummit! That there blue don't look right to me. That's dirty pool!"Is everyone on here a stereotypist? The NFL's requirement was 85 feet. The scoreboard is 90 feet. This is NFL's fault, not Cowboys. They followed the rules.stereotypist? http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raz Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 I'm just wondering if Cowboys fans will FINALLY notice that the blue on the white uniforms doesn't match the blue on the dark uniforms, or the new field. Nor do the pants worn with the white jersey match the silver of the field:"Hey, dadgummit! That there blue don't look right to me. That's dirty pool!"Is everyone on here a stereotypist? The NFL's requirement was 85 feet. The scoreboard is 90 feet. This is NFL's fault, not Cowboys. They followed the rules.stereotypist?Or "bigot," whichever you prefer ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EatSleepJeep Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 I still haven;'t been able to reconcile the field-level luxury boxes in my mind. The people in these boxes will see NOTHING of the game on the field; benches, players, cheerleaders, still-photogs, video-photogs, carts, crates, mobile camera platforms, officials, you get the idea will prevent any of them from actually seeing a live play. Can anyone correct me here? Are the standing surfaces somehow higher to give these people an actual view? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EatSleepJeep Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 double tap. oops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DallasSports Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 I'm just wondering if Cowboys fans will FINALLY notice that the blue on the white uniforms doesn't match the blue on the dark uniforms, or the new field. Nor do the pants worn with the white jersey match the silver of the field:"Hey, dadgummit! That there blue don't look right to me. That's dirty pool!"Is everyone on here a stereotypist? The NFL's requirement was 85 feet. The scoreboard is 90 feet. This is NFL's fault, not Cowboys. They followed the rules.stereotypist?You knew what I meant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ebod39 Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 I'm pretty sure that the Cowboys put the screen 5 feet above what the NFL recommended. They recommended 85 feet, Dallas put it at 90.True. However most punters don't have a small moon above them to hit.Yes, I know..."that's no moon, that's the Cowboys video screen" - thank you Obi-Wan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwabel Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 I still haven;'t been able to reconcile the field-level luxury boxes in my mind. The people in these boxes will see NOTHING of the game on the field; benches, players, cheerleaders, still-photogs, video-photogs, carts, crates, mobile camera platforms, officials, you get the idea will prevent any of them from actually seeing a live play. Can anyone correct me here? Are the standing surfaces somehow higher to give these people an actual view?The end zone suites are about the same level off the turf, as the Red Zone suites at Quest Field, which are four feet about the turf. The others are on at field level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubsFanBudMan Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 I still haven't been able to reconcile the field-level luxury boxes in my mind.I can see a future where there is nothing but luxury suites at stadiums (and I'll be watching on TV). But you're right, not great for the field level of football. As a Cowboys fan far from Dallas, I don't care much about the scoreboard, although it seems like it would be a distraction if the game plays live while you're trying to watch it on the field. Mixing in stats, etc. might be better.But, I do care about that endzone color switch. I like it. It's no secret Jerry Jones prefers navy and white if you look at the uniform changes over the years (throwbacks, warmups and blues in particular). Why he hasn't taken the final step and made the numbers and stripes on the white jerseys at least a couple shades darker -- if not full navy -- is beyond me. I think fans would get over it. Wouldn't mind a return to the old font, either.Why go through the trouble to switch end zone colors if you're going to wear a different color on the field? Any chance at all that there could be a surprise switch at the opener? (Or they could always wear the blues at the new home. Now that would be Jerry leaving a mark.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmoothieX Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 (Or they could always wear the blues at the new home. Now that would be Jerry leaving a mark.)I would love that! That white at home all the time thing is annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 stereotypist?Or "bigot," whichever you prefer ..."Texan" is now a protected class? The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRice16 Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 I love that picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leopard88 Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 stereotypist?Or "bigot," whichever you prefer ..."Texan" is now a protected class? Yes, just like white Christian males. Most Liked Content of the Day -- February 15, 2017, August 21, 2017, August 22, 2017 ///// Proud Winner of the CCSLC Post of the Day Award -- April 8, 2008 Originator of the Upside Down Sarcasm Smilie -- November 1, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruColor Posted August 27, 2009 Author Share Posted August 27, 2009 stereotypist?Or "bigot," whichever you prefer ..."Texan" is now a protected class? Yes, just like white Christian males. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.