jc... Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Does my TV suck or do the Bills have "Color Chrome" helmets? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDC Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Bears NOT in all white on the road in Atlanta. White jerseys, navy pants.....the way it should be ---Owner of the NHA's Philadelphia Quakers, the UBA's Chicago Skyliners, and the CFA's Portland Beavers (2010 CFA2 Champions)--- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njmeadowlanders Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Does my TV suck or do the Bills have "Color Chrome" helmets?IDK if your TV does but the Jets do...And the Jets weren't all green for what it was worth.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pharos04 Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 some shots from the Patriots-Oilers/Titans gameInteresting to note that they had the scoreboard for Boston and Oilers though not the Houston Oilers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweeper13 Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Looks like the Jags have moved to the newer cut of jersey Looks like they have the same issues with the Reebok logo as the Giants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brave-Bird 08 Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 what the heck is going on with the reebok logo? why is it pure white, and then sometimes faded... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tBBP Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Looks like the Jags have moved to the newer cut of jersey Looks like they have the same issues with the Reebok logo as the Giants.NOW can we all agree that this new design is s straight-up fail? Look it...the swooshes up on the jersey had to be altered to accomodate the shrinkwrap tailoring of this jersey...they're not even doing what they were intended to do.(And no...I don't know what's going on with the Rbk vactor logos, either.) *Disclaimer: I am not an authoritative expert on stuff...I just do a lot of reading and research and keep in close connect with a bunch of people who are authoritative experts on stuff. || dribbble || Behance || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Interesting to note that they had the scoreboard for Boston and Oilers though not the Houston OilersGood catch. I suppose to say they're Houston would be lying. Ugh, "Boston Patriots" sounds so much better, though. Why can't they always be that. ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Falcon Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Looks like the Jags have moved to the newer cut of jersey Looks like they have the same issues with the Reebok logo as the Giants.NOW can we all agree that this new design is s straight-up fail? No kidding, it doesn't shine nearly as much as they said it would...still looks black to me. And removing all traces of gold from the uniform really makes this set look bland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pharos04 Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Interesting to note that they had the scoreboard for Boston and Oilers though not the Houston OilersGood catch. I suppose to say they're Houston would be lying. Ugh, "Boston Patriots" sounds so much better, though. Why can't they always be that.Cause they actually acknowledge the little semantics such as they don't actually PLAY in Boston-proper *cough*Jets*cough*Giants*cough*. Hey they could always go back to the "Bay State Patriots" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Looks like the Jags have moved to the newer cut of jersey Looks like they have the same issues with the Reebok logo as the Giants.NOW can we all agree that this new design is s straight-up fail? No kidding, it doesn't shine nearly as much as they said it would...still looks black to me. And removing all traces of gold from the uniform really makes this set look bland.Seriously. This look is beyond crap. http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmoothieX Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 On the front of the jersey you haveNFL Equipment SheildJacksonvilleJaguarsMan is that busy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSky Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 One of the goofiest things about the new jerseys - which Garrard is clearly wearing, note the 'dot' pattern on front that I noticed for the first time while watching Saints-Giants yesterday - is how the NOB are down right on top of the numbers. Maybe not all the Jags are wearing them, because in the only 2 shots I could find showing NOB, one is goofy and one looks normal:Normal (Sidebar: Steven Jackson's thinking, "Stop touching me there!" )Goofy (Jag in background) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheo25 Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Seriously. This look is beyond crap.Not sure if you mean the Jaguars' overall look, but if you do, I would agree with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Interesting to note that they had the scoreboard for Boston and Oilers though not the Houston OilersGood catch. I suppose to say they're Houston would be lying. Ugh, "Boston Patriots" sounds so much better, though. Why can't they always be that.Cause they actually acknowledge the little semantics such as they don't actually PLAY in Boston-proper *cough*Jets*cough*Giants*cough*.Are you, like, proud of them for this? I don't get it. Are they taking a moral high ground by purporting to represent six entire states instead of a metropolitan area? Of course those teams don't play in Boston and New York, because you can't really find a place to build an NFL stadium (and parking lot) in Boston or New York. Logistically difficult. I'm sure they'd be there if it were possible. Hey they could always go back to the "Bay State Patriots"bluh ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbojohnny56 Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Should have never changed from being the Boston Patriots and you can make a case for that considering alot of teams have a hard time getting stadiums built in the metro areas but at least they stayed in state. The Jets and Giants are playing in a different state so they should be called the New Jersey Jets and the New Jersey Giants was'nt there anywhere else in New York state that they could have had a stadium built. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 I don't know. Maybe. East Rutherford is considered Greater New York, though. What if the city was called New York but the state it's in was called, I don't know, Crumpington. They'd still be the New York Giants, and nobody would care that the stadium wasn't in the state of Crumpington. ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fjm Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Saints in white at home against the Giants, according to Uni Watch.Assuming that means the Giants will be in the road pants with the blue tops, then.correctHave the Giants always worn their road-striped gray pants on the road, even when they are wearing their blue jerseys? I never noticed that before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Should have never changed from being the Boston Patriots and you can make a case for that considering alot of teams have a hard time getting stadiums built in the metro areas but at least they stayed in state. The Jets and Giants are playing in a different state so they should be called the New Jersey Jets and the New Jersey Giants was'nt there anywhere else in New York state that they could have had a stadium built.They are the New York metropolitain area team, since North Jersey is in metro NY, and is certainly in the NY sphere of influence.Just like when the Sixers were actually signed to a deal to play in an arena in Camden NJ - they were going to remain the Philadelphia 76ers.The Patriots would certainly be within their rights to call themselves the Boston Patriots. I guess they just see more marketing opportunities by claiming the whole NE region. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarred Revolver Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 Love the diamond end zones for the Chargers game tonight. Also, Broncos looking pretty cool in their AFL jerseys once again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.