Blue Falcon Posted October 28, 2009 Share Posted October 28, 2009 idk how many times these jaguars pants were used but this is the first time that i have seen them2003 was the first time they broke them out, and I think they wore them in 2004 as well. In 2005 they started with the leotard (emphasis on the 'TARD). Just another example of this team struggling to find an identity. Teams don't make 9 uniform changes in 15 years, like the Jaguars have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceCap Posted October 28, 2009 Share Posted October 28, 2009 The sad thing is that they had a solid, good looking identity before they started to mess around with it. PotD 26/2/12 1/7/15 2020 BASS Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal Regular Season Champion 2021 BASS NFL Pick'em Regular Season Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted October 28, 2009 Share Posted October 28, 2009 It's hard to have a solid teal-based identity past 1998. The Jaguars didn't really. β« oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is goneΒ β« Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceCap Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 Eh, they managed to make it their own. It may not have been awe-inspiringly awesome (looking at you Huston Texans), but it was unique, simple, and for the most part consistent. PotD 26/2/12 1/7/15 2020 BASS Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal Regular Season Champion 2021 BASS NFL Pick'em Regular Season Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSky Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 Socks are different and there are no sleeve stripes - are those practice jerseys?No. They are just an example of the Dolphins being incredibly inconsistent during that era. The pictures below are from Super Bowl VII -- you will see players in the same game with and without sleeve stripes (and with numbers that appear to of substantially difference thickness).That's bizarre. Never noticed it before either. In the top pic, check out Chris Hanburger (#55). Where the hell's he going? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 it was unique, simple, and for the most part consistent.The letters and numbers looked nothing alike and they played lots of mix-and-match with jerseys and pants. β« oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is goneΒ β« Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceCap Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 it was unique, simple, and for the most part consistent.The letters and numbers looked nothing alike and they played lots of mix-and-match with jerseys and pants.I was referring to the period before they started to play mix-and-match with the jerseys and pants. PotD 26/2/12 1/7/15 2020 BASS Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal Regular Season Champion 2021 BASS NFL Pick'em Regular Season Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSky Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 Looks like we'll see the Saints' black pants Monday night for the first time this season. From nola.com:===The Saints are expected to wear black jerseys and black pants Monday night against the Atlanta Falcons for the first time at home this season.===As I understand it, teams have to declare what they'll wear at home to the NFL before the season. Any deviation needs the opponents' approval. Seems odd to me that the Falcons would agree to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brave-Bird 08 Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 Looks like we'll see the Saints' black pants Monday night for the first time this season. From nola.com:===The Saints are expected to wear black jerseys and black pants Monday night against the Atlanta Falcons for the first time at home this season.===As I understand it, teams have to declare what they'll wear at home to the NFL before the season. Any deviation needs the opponents' approval. Seems odd to me that the Falcons would agree to that.that isnt odd. Atlanta's primary road is white on white. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleujayone Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 Socks are different and there are no sleeve stripes - are those practice jerseys?No. They are just an example of the Dolphins being incredibly inconsistent during that era. The pictures below are from Super Bowl VII -- you will see players in the same game with and without sleeve stripes (and with numbers that appear to of substantially difference thickness).That's bizarre. Never noticed it before either. In the top pic, check out Chris Hanburger (#55). Where the hell's he going? Nevermind that, in the lower picture, why is Washington's #22 R. Taylor reaching down and cupping his teammate's package while Larry Csonka runs by?!? We all have our little faults. Mine's in California. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 Looks like we'll see the Saints' black pants Monday night for the first time this season. From nola.com:===The Saints are expected to wear black jerseys and black pants Monday night against the Atlanta Falcons for the first time at home this season.===As I understand it, teams have to declare what they'll wear at home to the NFL before the season. Any deviation needs the opponents' approval. Seems odd to me that the Falcons would agree to that.I don't believe that the pants are included in the pre-season declaration. I'm fairly certain it's just jerseys. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RebelKnight29 Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruColor Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 Is anyone else seeing a lot of red x's in this thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSky Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 Looks like we'll see the Saints' black pants Monday night for the first time this season. From nola.com:===The Saints are expected to wear black jerseys and black pants Monday night against the Atlanta Falcons for the first time at home this season.===As I understand it, teams have to declare what they'll wear at home to the NFL before the season. Any deviation needs the opponents' approval. Seems odd to me that the Falcons would agree to that.I don't believe that the pants are included in the pre-season declaration. I'm fairly certain it's just jerseys.Doesn't matter in relation to my point, which is - psychologically speaking - why you would ever approve anything your rival wanted to do? Screw 'em! Ask yourself, why do the Saints want to wear all black? Because it's a special occasion, for intimidation, blah blah, whatever the reason, to me the Falcons should always say no if they have a choice. I'd same the same if the Falcons needed the Saints' approval to switch unis. You want to wear black? Sorry, you declared white, so wear your road uni.But if the Falcons want to say ok, fine by me. As long as the Saints win they can wear pink cleats for all I care. Oh, wait... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbojohnny56 Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 After seeing those old Redskins photos would anyone else besides me like to see the Skins go back to gold pants? I always liked those unis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Falcon Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 After seeing those old Redskins photos would anyone else besides me like to see the Skins go back to gold pants? I always liked those unis.Yup, they've had the same uniform since 1979 when Jack Pardee was the coach. I say bring back the spear helmet with a slightly updated uniform (like the Jets, Chargers, and Giants have done) and wear the darker burgundy and real gold...they can bring out their Gibbs-era uniforms as a throwback 1-2 times a year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 Looks like we'll see the Saints' black pants Monday night for the first time this season. From nola.com:===The Saints are expected to wear black jerseys and black pants Monday night against the Atlanta Falcons for the first time at home this season.===As I understand it, teams have to declare what they'll wear at home to the NFL before the season. Any deviation needs the opponents' approval. Seems odd to me that the Falcons would agree to that.I don't believe that the pants are included in the pre-season declaration. I'm fairly certain it's just jerseys.Doesn't matter in relation to my point, which is - psychologically speaking - why you would ever approve anything your rival wanted to do? Screw 'em! Ask yourself, why do the Saints want to wear all black? Because it's a special occasion, for intimidation, blah blah, whatever the reason, to me the Falcons should always say no if they have a choice. I'd same the same if the Falcons needed the Saints' approval to switch unis. You want to wear black? Sorry, you declared white, so wear your road uni.But if the Falcons want to say ok, fine by me. As long as the Saints win they can wear pink cleats for all I care. Oh, wait... If they declared before the season that they were wearing their black jerseys for this game, why would Atlanta have to approve to anything?It's not like they declare that white is their "home" uniform for all games. Several teams post their home-jersey schedule before the season starts, as it is a game-by-game thing. They just declare what they're wearing for each home game, not all home games. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buster Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 The best uni set the Jags have ever sported, IMO.Same for the Colts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubbies06 Posted October 31, 2009 Share Posted October 31, 2009 Socks are different and there are no sleeve stripes - are those practice jerseys?No. They are just an example of the Dolphins being incredibly inconsistent during that era. The pictures below are from Super Bowl VII -- you will see players in the same game with and without sleeve stripes (and with numbers that appear to of substantially difference thickness).That's bizarre. Never noticed it before either. In the top pic, check out Chris Hanburger (#55). Where the hell's he going? Larry Little thought his jersey said HAMburger, so he was running like hell to get away from him "We root for the laundry"(Jerome Seinfeld) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted October 31, 2009 Share Posted October 31, 2009 The best uni set the Jags have ever sported, IMO.Same for the Colts.While that may be the case for many, it's still up in the air for me between those (w/ the blue pants from '95) and their current unis w/ gray facemasks.In fact, can anyone find a clear pic of the early-80s Baltimore Colts, the ones with the gray mixed into the road uniforms? I'd like to take a good look at those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.