Ben7 Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 Complete 2010 MLS Uniforms and Apparel (pdf file 26.1 MB)thoughts to follow later, since I'm still at work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
horrorshow Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 I'd say the best looking of the bunch are Columbus' away duds with the yellow pinstripes. San Jose comes in a close second with their home shirts. I like to spout nonsense on camera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murtaugh Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 Mentioned elsewhere, but there's been some tweaks to Chicago's shirts since this catalog was produced last fall. All the shirts will be shown next Thursday at the draft. NO GRAND Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sodboy13 Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 Those asymmetrical side panels and inserts are positively crap-sucking. On 1/25/2013 at 1:53 PM, 'Atom said: For all the bird de lis haters I think the bird de lis isnt supposed to be a pelican and a fleur de lis I think its just a fleur de lis with a pelicans head. Thats what it looks like to me. Also the flair around the tip of the beak is just flair that fleur de lis have sometimes source I am from NOLA. PotD: 10/19/07, 08/25/08, 07/22/10, 08/13/10, 04/15/11, 05/19/11, 01/02/12, and 01/05/12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 I think it's crap the warm up gear looks better then the game gear. But at least the Crew's stuff looks pretty good this year   Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian in Boston Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 Those asymmetrical side panels and inserts are positively crap-sucking.Agreed. Frankly, in my honest opinion, the overall state of Major League Soccer's team uniforms is f***ing horrible. With the exception of the Colorado Rapids, I'd say that each and every MLS kit that will take the field this coming season will be marred in some way, shape or form by the inclusion of completely needless piping, inserts and/or asymmetrical design elements that manage to do nothing but clutter said uniforms' design aesthetics. Particularly egregious to this Revolution supporter is the inclusion of the completely unnecessary silver shoulder/sleeve inserts on said team's home jerseys. Gee, might the Revolution be operated by the same family that owns the New England Patriots? I never would have guessed if it hadn't been for this hideous attempt to render the Revolution's shirts as soccer equivalents of the NFL franchise's jerseys.Miserable... just f***ing miserable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sodboy13 Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 Having had a chance to look at the full PDF now, I have to add that I am absolutely dumbfounded by what Chivas Regal USA will be wearing. On 1/25/2013 at 1:53 PM, 'Atom said: For all the bird de lis haters I think the bird de lis isnt supposed to be a pelican and a fleur de lis I think its just a fleur de lis with a pelicans head. Thats what it looks like to me. Also the flair around the tip of the beak is just flair that fleur de lis have sometimes source I am from NOLA. PotD: 10/19/07, 08/25/08, 07/22/10, 08/13/10, 04/15/11, 05/19/11, 01/02/12, and 01/05/12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrySmalls Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Funny that the first image in the PDF is from the 2008 MLS Cup Final. Did Adidas (or MLS) really want the Galaxy to beat Real?More thoughts after I browse the PDF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrySmalls Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Chicago: What does "1939, 1871, 1893, and 1933" mean on the scarf?Chivas: The "unfinished" red and white stripping pattern on the front of the jersey (and merchandise!) is very bothersome;Colorado: It's about time to find a sponsor for the front, don't you think?Columbus: What doesn't work for Chivas, works for Columbus! Love the away jersey!DC: Finally, more RED (though thinly displayed)! Much improved over 2009.Dallas: Stop half-assing the stripes at the bottom of the jerseys, Adidas!Houston: Interesting use of the "sunlight" or "star burst" on the jerseys. Solid effort.Kansas City: Increase of gold bordering the panels and two-toned (or multi-toned?) blue; Time to upgrade the "text logo".Los Angeles: Meh. New England: Spider-man is the only thing that comes to mind. The jerseys are too busy with the various panels.New York: Placed after Salt Lake for some reason. Still with the "sports bra" template, ick.Philadelphia: Tri-paneled front on the jerseys, it's unique.Salt Lake: Minor changes to the panels. Are the stripes descending the front of the jersey two different colors?San Jose: Same comment as Columbus.Seattle: Minor tweaks. Wonder if there will be a white jersey in the future?Toronto: Solid home/away jerseys, however, do they still have the sublimated maple leaf underneath BMO on them?Jersey Ranks:1. Columbus2. Seattle3. Houston4. Toronto 5. San Jose6. Chicago7. DC8. Philadelphia9. Los Angeles 10. Salt Lake11. Colorado12. Kansas13. New York14. New England15. Dallas16. Chivas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rvrdgsfn Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Is it me or does most of the stuff on the pdf not load? I'm not getting them all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krona Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 likes:kansas city minus the horrid name and badgegalaxyDCdislikes:everything else, including another year with that unexplainable badge for the revs, continued use of crazy templates for adidas, and bargain basement-looking sponsor for chicago. I dont know why best buy or chicago isnt using this: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sodboy13 Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Chicago: What does "1939, 1871, 1893, and 1933" mean on the scarf?It's actually quite a nifty reference to the stars on Chicago's flag. Why none of the other scarves have references for the locals or supporters, I don't know. On 1/25/2013 at 1:53 PM, 'Atom said: For all the bird de lis haters I think the bird de lis isnt supposed to be a pelican and a fleur de lis I think its just a fleur de lis with a pelicans head. Thats what it looks like to me. Also the flair around the tip of the beak is just flair that fleur de lis have sometimes source I am from NOLA. PotD: 10/19/07, 08/25/08, 07/22/10, 08/13/10, 04/15/11, 05/19/11, 01/02/12, and 01/05/12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Droost Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 I believe this guide was done early in the season over based on 1) Philly's Uni's are not listed in the guide and they've been around for around 2 months, and 2) every championship is listed by the teams names and salt lake is excluded. Als0 there is no way that Best Buy would use its old wordmark on the jersey.Therefore I am hoping for a possible change in the NE & Crew wordmarks along with possible sponsorships added to Colorado and Dallas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Wolf Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Is it me or does most of the stuff on the pdf not load? I'm not getting them all.I'm having the same problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrySmalls Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Those asymmetrical side panels and inserts are positively crap-sucking.Agreed. Frankly, in my honest opinion, the overall state of Major League Soccer's team uniforms is f***ing horrible. With the exception of the Colorado Rapids, I'd say that each and every MLS kit that will take the field this coming season will be marred in some way, shape or form by the inclusion of completely needless piping, inserts and/or asymmetrical design elements that manage to do nothing but clutter said uniforms' design aesthetics. Particularly egregious to this Revolution supporter is the inclusion of the completely unnecessary silver shoulder/sleeve inserts on said team's home jerseys. Gee, might the Revolution be operated by the same family that owns the New England Patriots? I never would have guessed if it hadn't been for this hideous attempt to render the Revolution's shirts as soccer equivalents of the NFL franchise's jerseys.Miserable... just f***ing miserable.Didn't see your post Brian, I agree with your assessment of MLS' aesthetics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krona Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 And another thing, i really dont like Adidas' illustration template. It reminds me of the old illustrations on fashion patterns from the fabric store Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Colorado: It's about time to find a sponsor for the front, don't you think?No, thanks. They look great as they are. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJM Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 http://soccer.fanhouse.com/2010/01/08/2010-mls-uniforms-unveiled/Another link about new kits...Mostly disappointed with the new looks...Crew and Rapids look the best IMO. (MLF) Chicago Cannons,  (IHA) Phoenix Firebirds - 2021 Xtreme Cup Champions (WAFL) Phoenix Federals - WAFL World Bowl XII Champions (Defunct) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Wolf Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Colorado: It's about time to find a sponsor for the front, don't you think?No, thanks. They look great as they are.Agreed. I wish all soccer teams could go without sponsors on the front. And if you don't have a sponsor, you shouldn't have a wordmark either... Kansas City (though their uniforms and logo have plenty of problems beyond that). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murtaugh Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 Chicago are unveiling their new uniforms next Thursday. As mentioned earlier, do not be surprised if there are multiple differences between the final product and the catalog images here, produced last summer. NO GRAND Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.