CJworks Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 Much better. This looks pretty sick, now. I'm still not a fan of the striping but I think it workd for this uniform, so I'll give you credit for that. I'd still try to center the striping, and maybe throw a logo or two on the unis.Great update. Dribbble | Twitter | Facebook | Portfolio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Schwartz Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 Is that spiked strip at the top suppose to be off to the right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted February 1, 2010 Author Share Posted February 1, 2010 Updated:The "bear head" logo has been added and the striping, including the spiked strip, is now centered. The spiked strip now stops before the armholes. POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illwauk Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 You're getting there, but the numbers should be white. Making them orange causes them to blend into the stripes and makes them too hard to read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted February 1, 2010 Author Share Posted February 1, 2010 POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TornadoGTS Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 On our right side the top stripe stops at a seam, yet on the left it goes onto the sleeve, I think you need to rethink that stripe. Facebook: CustomSportsCovers Twitter: CSCovers Quote No because when the Irish came to Ireland and first came in contact with the leprechaun people, they didn't take their land away and force them to move west. Instead, the two groups learned to assimilate peacefully. However, certain tribes of the leprechaun refused to taint the pure blood and moved north into the forests of Ireland, only to be seen rarely, usually at the same time of a rainbows appearance and occasionally at the factories of Lucky Charms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted February 1, 2010 Author Share Posted February 1, 2010 Hopefully this is better. POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 make the bear head a little smaller. Maybe try the number with just a navy outline. I think it would look better, but maybe it wouldn't - would have to see it.The gradients are really cool here, definitely in the spirit of the pro-combat line.Maybe want to lose the Nike logo, and make the socks more NFL-ish, since even though this is a Nike pro-combat concept, it's nice to envision what it would actually look like if put into production. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJSCOTT Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 much better... i like the gradient effect on the stripes. dunno about the large # on the front though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 The 1994 Bears' throwback looks navy and orange in all the pictures I've seen, but SSUR says they were navy and gold. I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted February 1, 2010 Author Share Posted February 1, 2010 Logo shrunk, NFL-style socks with striping, Nike branding removed.I tried shrinking the number but it didn't look good, so I kept the large number. POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Digging it, except the socks. NFL requires that the entire calf be covered. Usually with white on the bottom half, though they make exceptions for throwbacks. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmac Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 I just don't think Nike would let one of there jerseys go without the logo. They tend to put on everything possible. https://www.behance.net/bmatukewic8043 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted February 1, 2010 Author Share Posted February 1, 2010 I realize the socks aren't exactly NFL standard, but there's limits to what can be modified with the template.Otherwise, I'm glad you like it. POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted February 1, 2010 Author Share Posted February 1, 2010 I just don't think Nike would let one of there jerseys go without the logo. They tend to put on everything possible.However, the NFL is anal about where jerseymakers can put their logo, so it would either be on the side of the uniform above the armhole or possibly on the back of the jersey - never on the front. Starter, Nike, Puma, and now Reebok have all had to follow these rules for many, many years. POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted February 2, 2010 Share Posted February 2, 2010 I would also remove the bear logo and make the number plain white. I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted February 2, 2010 Author Share Posted February 2, 2010 I would also remove the bear logo and make the number plain white.The logo and number stroke were both added on the suggestions of other members, so I think I'll keep them. Removing them would make the concept too plain, IMO. POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted February 2, 2010 Share Posted February 2, 2010 Yeah, I think something else needs to go on the jersey, and I can't think of anything else, so I vote to keep the bear head.Here's the thing though - how would this look with number 88 on it? Would too much of the design be lost behind a double number? "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrianVlietDesign Posted February 2, 2010 Share Posted February 2, 2010 These are just downright ugly. I hoped to God we never see this kind of stuff. I mean, you're second attempt at a Bears uniform looks much better. But, this reminds me too much of the NHL's 1990s Third jersey campaign. NYCFC - MLS CUP CHAMPIONS - 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted February 2, 2010 Share Posted February 2, 2010 Take it or leave it, but he outlined number simply doesn't fit the aesthetic of the old-time 'felt-strip' jersey you're emulating. I realize pro combat is modern in nature, but you've chosen to go the throwback route for the most part, as did many of the actual pro combat college teams, and your jersey will look better with one-color numbers and no logo, The outlined number competes with an already busy design (the orange panels), making the jersey look cluttered. The Bears themselves made this same mistake by using outlined numbers on their 1994 throwbacks (and using their current, round numbers instead of the more traditional block numbers that were used in the Bears' early days). I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.