CCSLC 2010 NCAA Power Rankings

[chuckymack]

NCAA TOP TEN

1. Oregon

2. Boise State

3. Alabama

4. Texas Christian

5. Missouri

6. Michigan State

7. Auburn

8. Ohio State

9. Utah

10. Wisconsin

[Jigga]

Not much movement on the ol' dartboard this week:

1. Oregon
   
2. Boise State
   
3. Auburn
   
4. Texas Christian
   
5. Alabama
   
6. Utah
   
7. Wisconsin
   
8. Ohio State
   
9. Nebraska
   
10. Oklahoma
    

[Gary]

1. Oregon(--)

2. Texas Christian(--)

3. Auburn(--)

4. Alabama(6)

5. Boise State(7)

6. Ohio State(8)

7. Oklahoma(9)

8. Nebraska(10)

9. Utah(NR)

10. Iowa(NR)

[OUSooners]

College Football Power Rankings

After Week 9

1.Oregon (=)

2.Auburn (=)

3.Alabama (+1)

4.Utah (+1)

5.Boise State (+1)

6.TCU (+2)

7.Oklahoma (+2)

8.Nebraska (+5)

9.Wisconsin (+1)

10.Ohio State (+1)

11.Iowa (+4)

12.Stanford (+5)

13.Arizona (-1)

14.Michigan State (-11)

15.Arkansas (+3)

16.LSU (=)

17.South Carolina (+2)

18.Missouri (-11)

19.Oklahoma State (+1)

20.Florida State (-6)

21.Baylor (+3)

22.North Carolina State (NR)

23.Virginia Tech (-1)

24.Nevada (NR)

25.UCF (NR)

OUT: 21 Miami (FL), 23 USC, 25 East Carolina

Close to Top 25: Mississippi State, Hawaii, Pittsburgh, San Diego State, Oregon State

[NEW.ERA]

Week 10 N.E Top 10

1. Oregon (1) vs. Washington

2. Auburn (2) vs. UT-Chatanooga

3. TCU (3) @ #8 Utah

4. Boise State (4) vs. Hawaii

5. Alabama (5) @ #10 LSU

6. Wisconsin (8) @ Purdue

7. Ohio State (9) BYE WEEK

8. Utah (10) vs. #3 TCU

9. Nebraska (NR) @ Iowa State

10. Stanford (NR) vs. Arizona

Game of the Week

#3 TCU @ #8 Utah (Will not knock one Non-AQ out of the BCS picture)

[zmspartans]

1 . Oregon (1)

2 . Auburn (4)

3 . TCU (2)

4 . Boise St . (3)

5 . Alabama (6)

6 . Utah (8)

7 . Wisconsin (9)

8 . Ohio St . (10)

9 . Nebraska (NR)

10 . Oklahoma (NR)

dropped out : Michigan St. , Missouri

[OUSooners]

College Football Power Rankings

After Week 10

1.Oregon (=)

2.Auburn (=)

3.TCU (+3)

4.Boise State (+1)

5.LSU (+11)

6.Wisconsin (+3)

7.Stanford (+5)

8.Ohio State (+2)

9.Nebraska (-1)

10.Michigan State (+4)

11.Alabama (-8)

12.Iowa (-1)

13.Arkansas (+2)

14.Utah (-10)

15.Oklahoma (-8)

16.Oklahoma State (+3)

17.Virginia Tech (+6)

18.Arizona (-5)

19.South Carolina (-2)

20.Mississippi State (NR)

21.Nevada (+3)

22.UCF (+3)

23.Florida (NR)

24.Texas A&M (NR)

25.Missouri (-7)

OUT: 20 Florida State, 21 Baylor, 22 North Carolina State

Close to Top 25: Miami (FL), Penn State, Pittsburgh, San Diego State, Kansas State

[knnhrvy16]

11-07-10

1. Oregon

2. Auburn

3. TCU

4. Boise State

5. LSU

6. Stanford

7. Wisconsin

8. Nebraska

9. Michigan State

10. Alabama

[chuckymack]

NCAA TOP TEN

1. Oregon {-}

2. Boise State {-}

3. Texas Christian {+1}

4. Auburn {+3}

5. Ohio State {+3}

6. Wisconsin {+4}

7. Louisiana State {NR}

8. Alabama {-5}

9. Nebraska {NR}

10. Stanford {NR}

[pianoknight]

For some reason, my original post didn't seem to go through....

Week 11 Rankings.

1. Oregon

2. Auburn

3. TCU

4. Boise State

5. Nebraska

6. LSU

7. Wisconsin

8. Stanford

9. Ohio State

10. Oklahoma State

[chuckymack]

NCAA TOP TEN

1. Oregon {-}

2. Boise State {-}

3. Texas Christian {-}

4. Auburn {-}

5. Ohio State {-}

6. Wisconsin {-}

7. Louisiana State {-}

8. Alabama {-}

9. Nebraska {-}

10. Stanford {-}

[Cujo]

- CCS Standings -

1. Oregon

2. Auburn

3. Nebraska

4. Stanford

5. LSU

6. Alabama

7. Wisconsin

8. Ohio State

9. Oklahoma State

10. Michigan State

[NJTank]

- CCS Standings -

1. Oregon

2. Auburn

3. Nebraska

4. Stanford

5. LSU

6. Alabama

7. Wisconsin

8. Ohio State

9. Oklahoma State

10. Michigan State

What idotic poll is this?

Where is TCU? where is Boise? This is a slap in the face at two unbeaten teams.

[Cujo]

- CCS Standings -

1. Oregon

2. Auburn

3. Nebraska

4. Stanford

5. LSU

6. Alabama

7. Wisconsin

8. Ohio State

9. Oklahoma State

10. Michigan State

What idotic poll is this?

Where is TCU? where is Boise? This is a slap in the face at two unbeaten teams.

Why should a non-BCS Conference school play in the BCS Championship game?

Outside of maybe playing Utah, TCU's strength of schedule is very poor -- Boise State's is even worse. How can either team be considered legit title contenders when they only play cupcakes?

[NJTank]

Because the BCS AQ is unfair and arbitrary.

[Lights Out]

Why should a non-BCS Conference school play in the BCS Championship game?

By your logic, why even bother having a championship game if several conferences are going to be shut out on day 1 every year?

How can either team be considered legit title contenders when they only play cupcakes?

Can't speak for TCU, but for Boise, the majority of the cupcakes on their schedule come from their own conference. Boise can't really help that, because it's not like Gene Bleymaier and Chris Petersen can storm into the Idaho/New Mexico State/Louisiana Tech/etc. athletic departments and start recruiting better and firing people left and right.

[Gary]

K, can we leave this talk to the NCAA Football thread, that is the reason why it's the CCSLC 2010 NCAA Power Rankings. It is their opinion and theirs alone, don't like it put Boise State #1 and TCU #2 or vice versa

[Cujo]

Why should a non-BCS Conference school play in the BCS Championship game?

By your logic, why even bother having a championship game if several conferences are going to be shut out on day 1 every year?

How can either team be considered legit title contenders when they only play cupcakes?

Can't speak for TCU, but for Boise, the majority of the cupcakes on their schedule come from their own conference. Boise can't really help that, because it's not like Gene Bleymaier and Chris Petersen can storm into the Idaho/New Mexico State/Louisiana Tech/etc. athletic departments and start recruiting better and firing people left and right.

Boise State has been excluded from the BCS Championship Game on several occasions before, having had the exact same resume: Unbeaten record and weak-ass schedule. So tell me, what makes this Boise State season any different than the rest? Unless you are taking into account what the Broncos have done in previous years, which counts for absolutely nothing, Boise shouldn't be cracking anybody's top ten.

[infrared41]

Why should a non-BCS Conference school play in the BCS Championship game?

By your logic, why even bother having a championship game if several conferences are going to be shut out on day 1 every year?

How can either team be considered legit title contenders when they only play cupcakes?

Can't speak for TCU, but for Boise, the majority of the cupcakes on their schedule come from their own conference. Boise can't really help that, because it's not like Gene Bleymaier and Chris Petersen can storm into the Idaho/New Mexico State/Louisiana Tech/etc. athletic departments and start recruiting better and firing people left and right.

Boise State has been excluded from the BCS Championship Game before having had the exact same resume: Unbeaten record and weak-ass schedule. So tell me, what makes this Boise State season any different than the rest?

Honestly? Because they were ranked in the top five at the beginning of the season. That's the one and only difference. So now we're letting a bunch of dumbass sports writers shape the debate. That's makes about as much sense as letting drunks run the liquor store.

[Lights Out]

If past performance counts for absolutely nothing, how does almost every single SEC school get ranked to start the year, simply based on past conference reputation? Florida certainly didn't deserve to be ranked in the top ten this year. Or take Oklahoma - high preseason ranking every year, choke every year. When are they going to finally be punished for that? That'd be never, because they're a "name" school, and those names were made in the past.

Without past performance, what else are you going to base preseason rankings on - recruiting class rankings? Boise's proven that those don't matter if you have an excellent system with excellent coaching.