Cosmic Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 I think it's safe to say that adding a gradient is an unpopular opinion around here, but I would like to see the Bengals try a helmet with some subtle white countershading like a real tiger has. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushy Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 Don't know if it's unpopular or not, but I hate the chargers navy uniforms. Way too many teams with navy in the league and I'm a sucker for baby blue. Throw in yellow? Ugh. You got me. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 15 minutes ago, Kaz said: Double whammy; not only are these the best the Chargers have ever looked, their current number font is among the league's best. More yellow, no navy, and I'll agree. 2 Quote ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Star Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 22 hours ago, bushy said: Don't know if it's unpopular or not, but I hate the chargers navy uniforms. Way too many teams with navy in the league and I'm a sucker for baby blue. Throw in yellow? Ugh. You got me. I like the collegiate blue too. To be honest, navy blue also works well like their 1986-1987 uniforms. Plus, I think the Dallas Cowboys, New England Patriots, Chicago Bears, and the San Diego Chargers (in my opinion) should be the only five teams to use navy blue. The Los Angeles Rams, Houston Texans, Tennessee Titans, and the Buffalo Bills (they have some navy blue) should drop or limit navy blue altogether. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Star Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 I don't care what anyone says. The Los Angeles Rams 1950 throwbacks are bad ass! 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk36 Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 23 hours ago, Kaz said: Double whammy; not only are these the best the Chargers have ever looked, their current number font is among the league's best. Those are the best of the current set but numerals are dated. Bad. 1 Quote Design Hovie Studios Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScubaSteve Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 I really think that from the waist up, this is the best the Chargers have ever looked 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rj0498 Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Staying on the NFL, I honestly wished that The browns would wear the orange pants more in their previous set 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 On 11/16/2016 at 4:20 PM, Dolphins Dynasty said: These uniforms suck. The jerseys are too generic and the striping looks like orange duct tape with tiger stripes. It's an overall outdated set that should stay in the past. This set was greatly improved when the stripes were tweaked in the '90s. It even looked nice in monochrome! 9 Quote POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnWis97 Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 I preferred the first Bengals "tiger stripe" set. The leaping tiger logo was great (way better than the B or the tiger head). But I thought it was overkill to put it on the sleeves when the uniform already had a tiger stripe motif. I also preferred the original looks thinner, and therefore more, stripes. While the 1981-2003 (?) look in general is popular, I get a sense that my preference toward the earlier, thinner stripes is unpopular. Quote Disclaimer: If this comment is about an NBA uniform from 2017-2018 or later, do not constitute a lack of acknowledgement of the corporate logo to mean anything other than "the corporate logo is terrible and makes the uniform significantly worse." BADGERS TWINS VIKINGS TIMBERWOLVES WILD POTD (Shared) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Lankford Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 On 17 de noviembre de 2016 at 1:44 AM, the admiral said: More yellow, no navy, and I'll agree. The navy blue provides some much needed contrast. Powder blue, yellow and white are all too soft together. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstroCreep Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 I like the Celtics black alternatives. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 2 hours ago, Ray Lankford said: The navy blue provides some much needed contrast. Powder blue, yellow and white are all too soft together. Bolder yellow outlines would give enough contrast, I think. If you need a darker blue, use a medium blue, but I don't think you do. Quote ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan33 Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 8 hours ago, insert name said: I like the Celtics black alternatives. Me too, I would like to see them wear these full time with a matching white. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM0313 Posted November 19, 2016 Share Posted November 19, 2016 On 11/17/2016 at 6:11 PM, Silver_Star said: I like the collegiate blue too. To be honest, navy blue also works well like their 1986-1987 uniforms. Plus, I think the Dallas Cowboys, New England Patriots, Chicago Bears, and the San Diego Chargers (in my opinion) should be the only five teams to use navy blue. The Los Angeles Rams, Houston Texans, Tennessee Titans, and the Buffalo Bills (they have some navy blue) should drop or limit navy blue altogether. You listed four teams and said they were the only five who should wear navy. I actually sort of agree with you though. The Texans should also be able to keep their colors, but their blue isn't really navy. They call it "deep steel blue" and, true to the metallic name, it has more grey in it than navy does. I'd love to see the Rams, Titans and Bills drop navy though. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk36 Posted November 19, 2016 Share Posted November 19, 2016 9 hours ago, Ray Lankford said: The navy blue provides some much needed contrast. Powder blue, yellow and white are all too soft together. I think these were the best they've ever looked. Just a tad bit of the navy/black but 99% powder/yellow. 6 Quote Design Hovie Studios Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Star Posted November 19, 2016 Share Posted November 19, 2016 10 minutes ago, MCM0313 said: You listed four teams and said they were the only five who should wear navy. I actually sort of agree with you though. The Texans should also be able to keep their colors, but their blue isn't really navy. They call it "deep steel blue" and, true to the metallic name, it has more grey in it than navy does. I'd love to see the Rams, Titans and Bills drop navy though. True. Yeah, the Houston Texans look good with the color, but some white with the red piping like the Washington Redskins style would make them SWEET!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted November 19, 2016 Share Posted November 19, 2016 32 minutes ago, hawk36 said: I think these were the best they've ever looked. Just a tad bit of the navy/black but 99% powder/yellow. Yeah, if you had that width of yellow outline on the Agency numbers and a yellow facemask, it'd be a perfect update for today. 4 Quote ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM0313 Posted November 19, 2016 Share Posted November 19, 2016 59 minutes ago, Silver_Star said: True. Yeah, the Houston Texans look good with the color, but some white with the red piping like the Washington Redskins style would make them SWEET!!! Red piping? I didn't think the Redskins had any piping at all. Can you show me a pic of what you mean? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnPheitseog Posted November 19, 2016 Share Posted November 19, 2016 2 hours ago, MCM0313 said: You listed four teams and said they were the only five who should wear navy. I actually sort of agree with you though. The Texans should also be able to keep their colors, but their blue isn't really navy. They call it "deep steel blue" and, true to the metallic name, it has more grey in it than navy does. I'd love to see the Rams, Titans and Bills drop navy though. I don't mind the bills in navy, but, the way they are using it it shouldn't be there. 2 Quote Formerly known as DiePerske Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.