Morgan33 4,129 Posted September 23, 2016 1 hour ago, McCarthy said: The Flames should put that logo on the shoulders of the primary uniforms in place of the flags. It'd make a bad uniform slightly tolerable. Couldn't agree more. The piping to nowhere and intersecting hem stripes would almost be tolerable without those half-assed flags. As for that logo, I wouldn't call it brilliant by any stretch but at least it's an actual attempt at branding. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ScubaSteve 1,009 Posted September 27, 2016 I never really liked the Saints old, mustardy gold everyone seems to love. But it looks like I have good reason. It's pretty darn close to what scientists consider the ugliest color: http://time.com/4353765/worlds-ugliest-color-discourages-smoking/ 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wandell 94 Posted September 28, 2016 I always liked this Browns uniform. 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dont care 6,991 Posted September 28, 2016 35 minutes ago, Wandell said: I always liked this Browns uniform. That's unpopular? 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wandell 94 Posted September 28, 2016 Apparently a lot of people don't care for the brown/orange pants. LOL 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
insert name 5,197 Posted September 28, 2016 I don't. I think that combo is ugly. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2001mark 1,204 Posted September 29, 2016 Some team should just come out with an all white home set. Numbers only. No trim, no names, no logos, no nothing. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FinsUp1214 5,729 Posted September 29, 2016 10 hours ago, insert name said: I don't. I think that combo is ugly. I'm on your side also. Orange-white-orange was okay, but orange-brown-orange was/is overboard. One of those "just because you can doesn't mean you should" sort of deals in my book. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dynasty 2,420 Posted September 29, 2016 That's arguably the best the Browns have ever looked IMO. I always thought the orange pants brought more color to their set (especially their away). Of course, now they use too much orange. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dont care 6,991 Posted September 29, 2016 8 hours ago, FinsUp1214 said: I'm on your side also. Orange-white-orange was okay, but orange-brown-orange was/is overboard. One of those "just because you can doesn't mean you should" sort of deals in my book. i like it when ever the helmets and pants match, so i really like those uniforms. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
orangefaniniowa 268 Posted September 29, 2016 Before the Adidas Rev 30 garbage the NBA, I always loved the thick dri-fit jerseys Nike/Reebok/pre-2010 Adidas developed for teams. They looked good and stand out more than today's unis. The stitching on numerals and NOBs were a whole lot better and stood out more compared to today's Rev 30 stitching Adidas developed six years ago. Let's hope when Nike takes over the NBA contract next season, they need to go back to the thicker and better look (let's hope). BTW: It may not be an unpopular opinion, because some people do like the thick dri-fit jerseys. But it is my opinion. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dynasty 2,420 Posted October 1, 2016 Block number fonts are incredibly overrated. Yeah, they're more eligible than other fonts, but they're just SO boring. I think (some) custom fonts give teams more character in their design and honestly, I don't think every team needs to use the same number font just because it's LOL traditional. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Silver_Star 218 Posted October 2, 2016 On 9/28/2016 at 8:33 AM, Wandell said: I always liked this Browns uniform. Reason why they looked so good because of the AWESOME FORREST :censored:ING GREGG! Forrest Gregg did the uniforms like that because he was in tune with Green Bay and the Packers uniform design. Same with how Vince Lombardi did the Washington Redskins 1970-1971 design. Only difference with the Redskins and Browns was the Redskins ditch the helmets by 1972 while the Browns kept the Green Bay Packers like design from 1975-1983 which they look AWESOME! Thanks for bringing this back in here. The Browns best years ever! 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Silver_Star 218 Posted October 2, 2016 On 9/27/2016 at 2:13 PM, ScubaSteve said: I never really liked the Saints old, mustardy gold everyone seems to love. But it looks like I have good reason. It's pretty darn close to what scientists consider the ugliest color: http://time.com/4353765/worlds-ugliest-color-discourages-smoking/ Ok are you fine now? HAHAHAHAHA! At least afterwards, the block numbers became plain which made the uniform decent in many ways. Yeah the gold numbers on the road whites are good, but I hated that and liked them better with just their later plain block numbers. I wonder if they used it later on! 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harmening 210 Posted October 2, 2016 12 hours ago, Silver_Star said: Reason why they looked so good because of the AWESOME FORREST :censored:ING GREGG! Forrest Gregg did the uniforms like that because he was in tune with Green Bay and the Packers uniform design. Same with how Vince Lombardi did the Washington Redskins 1970-1971 design. Only difference with the Redskins and Browns was the Redskins ditch the helmets by 1972 while the Browns kept the Green Bay Packers like design from 1975-1983 which they look AWESOME! Thanks for bringing this back in here. The Browns best years ever! Wasn't he nothing more than an assistant coach with the Browns? Doubt he would have the power to have any say on uniforms. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mitch B 681 Posted October 2, 2016 27 minutes ago, Harmening said: Wasn't he nothing more than an assistant coach with the Browns? Doubt he would have the power to have any say on uniforms. Gregg was their head coach in the mid '70s. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harmening 210 Posted October 2, 2016 2 hours ago, Mitch B said: Gregg was their head coach in the mid '70s. Ahhh, you're right. Forgot about that. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IceCap 22,606 Posted October 2, 2016 On 2016-09-30 at 9:52 PM, Dolphins Dynasty said: Block number fonts are incredibly overrated. Yeah, they're more eligible than other fonts, but they're just SO boring. I think (some) custom fonts give teams more character in their design and honestly, I don't think every team needs to use the same number font just because it's LOL traditional. I think you mean "legible." 6 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harmening 210 Posted October 2, 2016 Block font should be the only eligible font out there. 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Silver_Star 218 Posted October 2, 2016 11 hours ago, Harmening said: Wasn't he nothing more than an assistant coach with the Browns? Doubt he would have the power to have any say on uniforms. He was a head coach for Cleveland Browns from 1975-1977 before Sam came in. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites