Shumway Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 LinkI came across this this morning and figured I'd share. I actually really like probably 10-15 of these on here (i.e. Browns, Dolphins, Eagles etc.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 The only ones I dislike on this list are the Eagles throwback, John Daly's pink pants, the Canadiens throwback, and the Syracuse lacrosse team's set. POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Braden Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 I'm pretty sure most of us can come up with a better list than that waste of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horror Show Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 Does anyone even edit Bleacher Report articles? This piece is just poorly written, from the lack of creativity with the descriptions, to the misspellings (no, not typos, blatant spelling errors) and grammatical errors. Good thing it had pictures."Waste?"Verticle?"Stries?" "Wasteband?"...and it doesn't end there folks. Good grief. As a newspaper writer who takes a bit of pride in his work and writing, I'm absolutely embarrassed to see something like this get published. To my knowledge, the Bleacher Report's writers are unpaid, but that's no excuse for such low quality work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieRose Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 I love how the 90's for the Dolphins and Cavs were considered the "early days" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRenesis Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 I'm pretty sure most of us can come up with a better list than that waste of time.This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePreacher Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 As soon as I saw the headline to this thread I thought "Oh God..." It should read "Some random hack contributor to Bleacher Report's 50 ugliest unis of all time" ... Shumway, not sure if you're aware of this, but Bleacher Report is simply a website where literally ANYONE can post an article without being edited, spell-checked, verified for facts, etc. It's basically the wikipedia of sports blogs/websites. But worse. That being said, I think you had good intentions posting this. So thank you =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punch Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 One of the descriptions said one of the uniforms is both "cluttered" and "plain". Is that possible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEW.ERA Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 All of Bleacher Reports lists are just bad. JETS|PACK|JAYS|NUFC|BAMA|BOMBERS|RAPS|ORANJE| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePreacher Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 Haha I love this... "The Connecticut Sun uniform looks very outdated and dark.The thick lines and heavy colors make these uniforms look very ugly"I think they look solid. Plus this guy's prose is intoxicating... Here, let me try: Despite being a classic and though not worst on the list this Chicago Bulls uniform is simply to brite I dont know I might be crazy but the 1996 Chicago bulls uniform is definitely ugly How'd I sound guys?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommytimp Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 Despite being a classic and though not worst on the list this Chicago Bulls uniform is simply to brite I dont know I might be crazy but the 1996 Chicago bulls uniform is definitely ugly How'd I sound guys??Excellent."The back names dontmatch the fronts wordmarks. How anybody thought they could win in these is a mystery tome." "The trouble with quotes on the Internet is that it's hard to verify their authenticity."--Abraham Lincoln Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmoothieX Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 I think some of the throwbacks they show are pretty bad, but that's the point. To illustrate your team's past, when uni fashions and trends were very different. Something that looked hip in the 70s is just plain garish today.Despite being a classic and though not worst on the list this Chicago Bulls uniform is simply to brite I dont know I might be crazy but the 1996 Chicago bulls uniform is definitely ugly How'd I sound guys??Excellent."The back names dontmatch the fronts wordmarks. How anybody thought they could win in these is a mystery tome."Red is the color of these jerseeys. However Bulls arenot red. But if Redbull gives you wings, and wings would be of help to basketball player, one can see why this team won so many games evin though ugliness is what is represented here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old School Fool Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 This list is !90's Browns, 90's Dolphins, 90's Lakers, and current Spurs on the list!? Are you kidding me!? Hell, the person writing this article can't even spell "waistband"! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mingjai Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 1974 Dutch World Cup UniformThis uniform worn by the Dutch in the 1974 World Cup is not a very fashionable look.There is so much orange in this outfit that it is almost too much to handle. And it might have looked better if the lettering on the shorts was the same color as the decal on the shirt.I believe this is one of the more classic looks in world soccer, but given his orange comment, something tells me that he probably doesn't like any of Holland's primary soccer kits. Visit my store on REDBUBBLE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jezus_Ghoti Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 Bleacher Report articles are almost all written by idiotic kids. Anyone can write for that site and no one edits the content.It's a waste of time to pay any attention to articles you find on BR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePreacher Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 I think some of the throwbacks they show are pretty bad, but that's the point. To illustrate your team's past, when uni fashions and trends were very different. Something that looked hip in the 70s is just plain garish today.Despite being a classic and though not worst on the list this Chicago Bulls uniform is simply to brite I dont know I might be crazy but the 1996 Chicago bulls uniform is definitely ugly How'd I sound guys??Excellent."The back names dontmatch the fronts wordmarks. How anybody thought they could win in these is a mystery tome."Red is the color of these jerseeys. However Bulls arenot red. But if Redbull gives you wings, and wings would be of help to basketball player, one can see why this team won so many games evin though ugliness is what is represented here.One of the first times I literally LOL'd on the computer in a long time. Thank you for that sir. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Wolf Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 I like that he refers to the Orlando Thunder as being an AFL team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrySmalls Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 Any list that considers the 2010 Norway's Curling Teams pants as ugly needs to reassess their sports aesthetics credentials. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PackerBadger Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 This is clearly a list ... but you have to admit he has a point about these:File this under the "Even a Stopped Clock Is Right Twice a Day" Dept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infrared41 Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 I'm pretty sure most of us can come up with a better list than that waste of time.This...Does anyone even edit Bleacher Report articles? This piece is just poorly written, from the lack of creativity with the descriptions, to the misspellings (no, not typos, blatant spelling errors) and grammatical errors. Good thing it had pictures."Waste?"Verticle?"Stries?" "Wasteband?"...and it doesn't end there folks. Good grief. As a newspaper writer who takes a bit of pride in his work and writing, I'm absolutely embarrassed to see something like this get published. To my knowledge, the Bleacher Report's writers are unpaid, but that's no excuse for such low quality work....and this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.