Jump to content

Jacksonville Jaguars NOB


oldschoolvikings

Recommended Posts

I was just leafing thru a new NFL catalog (Came in the mail!! Shades of the pre-interwebs days!) and looking at the Jags jerseys... are their NOBs actually slightly arched, or is something wrong with the picture? Or my eyesight?

Anyone confirm?

I cant confirm it but in this picture it does look slightly arched.

p5922383dt.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks to me like the natural curve of the jersey.

If you look at in-game photos you can tell that the new material (techfit) causes some of the namplates to get awkwardly skewed. Like in this picture:

x610.jpg

But, judging by David Garrard's jersey, the NOB appears pretty straight.

x610.jpg

BROWNS | BUCKEYES | CAVALIERS | INDIANS |

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

x610.jpg

God, look at Lewis' jersey. It's like the team got their uniforms done at the least reputable t-shirt shop in town.

On 1/25/2013 at 1:53 PM, 'Atom said:

For all the bird de lis haters I think the bird de lis isnt supposed to be a pelican and a fleur de lis I think its just a fleur de lis with a pelicans head. Thats what it looks like to me. Also the flair around the tip of the beak is just flair that fleur de lis have sometimes source I am from NOLA.

PotD: 10/19/07, 08/25/08, 07/22/10, 08/13/10, 04/15/11, 05/19/11, 01/02/12, and 01/05/12.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think NFL uniform regulations prohibit any sort of nameplating that isn't x inches high, above the numbers, and horizontal. Of course, NFL uniform regulations also prohibit everything currently worn in the NFL, so...?

♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫

Link to comment
Share on other sites

x610.jpg

God, look at Lewis' jersey. It's like the team got their uniforms done at the least reputable t-shirt shop in town.

Just looks like the material is stretched akwardly to me.

As a Jags fan, I'm not a fan. ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks to me like the natural curve of the jersey.

If you look at in-game photos you can tell that the new material (techfit) causes some of the namplates to get awkwardly skewed. Like in this picture:

x610.jpg

But, judging by David Garrard's jersey, the NOB appears pretty straight.

x610.jpg

What's up with this photo? Garrard's striping looks like the normal team pattern, but No. 62's looks like it starts under the armpit. I know lineman's jerseys are cut and/or worn differently, but even with a different shoulder/sleeve cut, shouldn't that particular striping be unaffected??

HornetsTwistSig.gif

New York Jets |3-3| First, AFC East

New York Mets |74-88| Fourth, NL East

New York Islanders|34-37-11| Fifth, Atlantic Division

New Orleans Hornets |21-45| Third, Southwest Division

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks to me like the natural curve of the jersey.

If you look at in-game photos you can tell that the new material (techfit) causes some of the namplates to get awkwardly skewed. Like in this picture:

x610.jpg

But, judging by David Garrard's jersey, the NOB appears pretty straight.

x610.jpg

I know this kinda off-topic, but David Garrard's cleats look really dope.

Quote

If you hadn't noticed, Chawls loves his wrestling, whether it be real life or sim. :D

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kenny, the discrepancy you're seeing is that Garrard is wearing a regular/"old" jersey, while the lineman is wearing one of the extra-tight TechFit jerseys. A few games into last season, the Jags started wearing TechFit on a player-by-player basis. The fact that the Jaguars changed uniforms to a design with wacky round-the-back piping that became outmoded and unusable a half-season after they introduced it is perhaps the most hysterical piece of evidence toward the Jags' uniform redesign being an abject failure.

On 1/25/2013 at 1:53 PM, 'Atom said:

For all the bird de lis haters I think the bird de lis isnt supposed to be a pelican and a fleur de lis I think its just a fleur de lis with a pelicans head. Thats what it looks like to me. Also the flair around the tip of the beak is just flair that fleur de lis have sometimes source I am from NOLA.

PotD: 10/19/07, 08/25/08, 07/22/10, 08/13/10, 04/15/11, 05/19/11, 01/02/12, and 01/05/12.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kenny, the discrepancy you're seeing is that Garrard is wearing a regular/"old" jersey, while the lineman is wearing one of the extra-tight TechFit jerseys. A few games into last season, the Jags started wearing TechFit on a player-by-player basis. The fact that the Jaguars changed uniforms to a design with wacky round-the-back piping that became outmoded and unusable a half-season after they introduced it is perhaps the most hysterical piece of evidence toward the Jags' uniform redesign being an abject failure.

THIS.

*Disclaimer: I am not an authoritative expert on stuff...I just do a lot of reading and research and keep in close connect with a bunch of people who are authoritative experts on stuff. 😁

|| dribbble || Behance ||

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks to me like the natural curve of the jersey.

If you look at in-game photos you can tell that the new material (techfit) causes some of the namplates to get awkwardly skewed. Like in this picture:

x610.jpg

But, judging by David Garrard's jersey, the NOB appears pretty straight.

x610.jpg

What's up with this photo? Garrard's striping looks like the normal team pattern, but No. 62's looks like it starts under the armpit. I know lineman's jerseys are cut and/or worn differently, but even with a different shoulder/sleeve cut, shouldn't that particular striping be unaffected??

Yea, they managed to make the cut affect the striping. If you look at this pic (below) you can see that the striping continues onto the sleeve, to give it a similar appearance.

610x.jpg

BROWNS | BUCKEYES | CAVALIERS | INDIANS |

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.