reppact Posted January 19, 2011 Share Posted January 19, 2011 Modern:Retro: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walkerws Posted January 19, 2011 Share Posted January 19, 2011 That second one is the Chicago Bruisers! Did they get their logos when they came back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agentrygraphics Posted January 19, 2011 Share Posted January 19, 2011 ...because "10th Anniversary" & "Season" don't look unbalanced or anything... "This isn't just the Oregon Ducks, it's Football's Future Turf Soldier War Hero Steel Robot Tech Flex Machine Army." -CS85 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chazberg Posted January 19, 2011 Share Posted January 19, 2011 There's not much 'retro' about the second one, and those 'R' logos look really awkward and wrong on the dog's shoulders charles-noerenberg.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJM Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Both are nothing to celebrate. (MLF) Chicago Cannons,  (IHA) Phoenix Firebirds - 2021 Xtreme Cup Champions (WAFL) Phoenix Federals - WAFL World Bowl XII Champions (Defunct) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuffDawg Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 I'd say surviving ten years in the AFL without folding or being relocated five times is cause for celebration... and a possible record. There comes a point when you don't stand for the constant heartbreak anymore, and walk away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubsFanBudMan Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 The first one is fine. The second one makes absolutely no sense for an anniversary logo. In those 10 seasons, they never used a logo from the Chicago team at preceded them in the AFL. Why start now? In a logo celebrating *your* team? The Bruisers must have been a full decade earlier.I am a fan of the AFL, but this revival is making a mess of the branding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tannerman Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Prior to the "new" AFL winning the rights to the "old" AFL logos/names, ArenaFootballOne secured the rights to the Chicago Bruisers, probably as a backup plan in case they couldn't get the Rush identity. Olympic Broadcaster Logos - BevReview.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norva Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 I'd say surviving ten years in the AFL without folding or being relocated five times is cause for celebration... and a possible record.The Storm and Predators have been in Tampa and Orlando since 1991, the Rattlers 1992. San Jose 1995. So no record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fumbler Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 Srsly to gimmicky. RICHMOND TIGERS Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shengxuan Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 [sPAM] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubsFanBudMan Posted January 23, 2011 Share Posted January 23, 2011 Prior to the "new" AFL winning the rights to the "old" AFL logos/names, ArenaFootballOne secured the rights to the Chicago Bruisers, probably as a backup plan in case they couldn't get the Rush identity.True, but as a Rush fan, do you like them randomly using the Bruisers logo now, on an anniversary logo no less? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sodboy13 Posted January 23, 2011 Share Posted January 23, 2011 I don't like them just usurping the Bruisers mascot and calling it their own. If you want to wear Bruisers throwbacks for a game or something and honor the original team, that's fine. But this is like the Wild using the North Stars' "N" in an anniversary logo.My favorite part, though, is how they didn't even bother to rotate the "R" logos a single degree to look like they belong on the shoulders. I'm shocked they bothered to scale them. On 1/25/2013 at 1:53 PM, 'Atom said: For all the bird de lis haters I think the bird de lis isnt supposed to be a pelican and a fleur de lis I think its just a fleur de lis with a pelicans head. Thats what it looks like to me. Also the flair around the tip of the beak is just flair that fleur de lis have sometimes source I am from NOLA. PotD: 10/19/07, 08/25/08, 07/22/10, 08/13/10, 04/15/11, 05/19/11, 01/02/12, and 01/05/12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubsFanBudMan Posted January 23, 2011 Share Posted January 23, 2011 Agreed. If it was celebrating the anniversary of AFL in Chicago, fine. But not celebrating 10 years of the Rush. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.