MDC Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 So yeah, watching the Grizzlies vs Thunder this past week got me thinking about the Grizzlies identity. I kinda hate their current logo. The bear looks like a robot. The colors on the other hand, I dig. I drew a lot of inspiration from the old Vancouver/Early Memphis look, but added my own touches to simplify the face. The colors are the current blues and yellow but tweaked a bit. I plan on finishing this up in the coming days, I just wanted a first opinion. Plus, it kinda looks like Z-Bo. ---Owner of the NHA's Philadelphia Quakers, the UBA's Chicago Skyliners, and the CFA's Portland Beavers (2010 CFA2 Champions)--- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbannon92 Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 I really like this a lot. I like the symmetry, and the fact that it looks more like their old logo. Also, nice work with the M and G in the ears...a subtle but very nice touch.My only worry is the tongue...I'm not sure about the blue shape in the middle. Nike + CFL 2015 | 2015-16 NBA Concepts | Complete College Football Redesign Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OchentaYOcho88 Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 I didn't even see the M and G very nice touch!I agree with mbannon the blue shape in the center of the tongue doesn't seem to be doing anything. Maybe use a slimmer shape to represent the "split" in the bear's tongue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaha32 Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 I like it. as mcbannon said, the M and G in the ear is a nice little addition, but for me this would be a lateral move. It doesnt seem any better or worse than what they have now. The tongue could be smaller and less prominent. also the eyes seem too low or something. it might just be me and I cant put my finger on it... but overall, this is good and it could work for a variety of teams who have a bear name of some kind. DesignsByHahn.com Behance Dribbble Instragram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loogodude90 Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 Wow, I think this is an definite upgrade. The M and G in the ears is genius, and it actually looks like the Grizzly is fierce. It gives the logo some emotion. On top of all that, it does kind of connect the current logo to the old one. I'm glad you didn't change the colors. But I don't really think it matters that it looks like Randolph, I don't think it makes sense to model a team's logo after a player who happens to be on the team. Great work. WIZARDS ORIOLES CAPITALS RAVENS UNITED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
undead Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 I like it. The M and G are great. What if you changed the tongue to light blue and the teeth to yellow? I think it would draw attention away from the tongue and to the teeth. Just a thought. Portfoliobobschultz6' class="bbc_url">@bobschultz6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
camly Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 I like it. The M and G look great. Look good but not too forced. I like how this looks more like a grizzly instead of a panda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YessSir32 Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 Wow, I didn't notice the M and G either and I think that it is genius. The tongue looks like a heart though, I would make the whole tongue yellow. Detroit Falcons (NABL) | Detroit Gears (UFL) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elliott Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 Good start, some advice tho:-Make the teeth have lines that come to points, we want sharpness associated with teeth, not rounded edges-try to add in some white to the light blue fur highlights, as it stands the only white is in the nose and it would brighten it up a little-the tongue is pretty bad, it needs way more blue-I'd drop the MG in the ears, and add real ear detail instead. While clever, its distracting from the rest of the design, for me.-Maybe try making the shape you have at the top of the head into a M instead?I think the symmetry is solid here, and the strongest detail is in the eye area, looks nice. But try refining this and it could turn into a really great logo. Dribbble ... Behance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Akronite- Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 Good start, some advice tho:-Make the teeth have lines that come to points, we want sharpness associated with teeth, not rounded edges-try to add in some white to the light blue fur highlights, as it stands the only white is in the nose and it would brighten it up a little-the tongue is pretty bad, it needs way more blue-I'd drop the MG in the ears, and add real ear detail instead. While clever, its distracting from the rest of the design, for me.-Maybe try making the shape you have at the top of the head into a M instead?I think the symmetry is solid here, and the strongest detail is in the eye area, looks nice. But try refining this and it could turn into a really great logo.I would replace the word "advice" with the word "suggestions," as I agree with very little of what you said (well, I can see your point on the first couple but I am vehemently against the last two). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loogodude90 Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 Good start, some advice tho:-Make the teeth have lines that come to points, we want sharpness associated with teeth, not rounded edges-try to add in some white to the light blue fur highlights, as it stands the only white is in the nose and it would brighten it up a little-the tongue is pretty bad, it needs way more blue-I'd drop the MG in the ears, and add real ear detail instead. While clever, its distracting from the rest of the design, for me.-Maybe try making the shape you have at the top of the head into a M instead?I think the symmetry is solid here, and the strongest detail is in the eye area, looks nice. But try refining this and it could turn into a really great logo.I would replace the word "advice" with the word "suggestions," as I agree with very little of what you said (well, I can see your point on the first couple but I am vehemently against the last two).Agreed... the reason I like the M and G so much is that I actually didn't even notice them until someone pointed them out. I think that's why it works so well. It's not in-your-face, but it's there. If you look the logo in the eyes (which is naturally where your eyes would be drawn here), you (or at least I) barely notice the ears, unless you already know about the M and G. WIZARDS ORIOLES CAPITALS RAVENS UNITED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BJBerthiaume Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 At first glance it reminds me a little too much of the Mobile Baybears. It is a very good design, however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keeb13r Posted May 12, 2011 Share Posted May 12, 2011 The teeth need to be sharp to match the sharpness of the other shapes in the logo. And I would refine the tongue a little more.Otherwise, it looks fantastic! I don't know why they ditched the Vancouver-era logos for the boring sleepy bear. You've done a great job of reconciling their best logo with their current colors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious Posted May 13, 2011 Share Posted May 13, 2011 Maybe its just me, but the first thing I thought of when I saw it was a gorilla, or a monkey of some sort.I would sharpen the teeth, and fix the tongue. I also think your outline is very thick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shumway Posted May 13, 2011 Share Posted May 13, 2011 Maybe its just me, but the first thing I thought of when I saw it was a gorilla, or a monkey of some sort.I would sharpen the teeth, and fix the tongue. I also think your outline is very thick.I was thinking the same thing....I immediately saw "gorilla" on this one. I think if you gave more depth to the snout/muzzle area, it'll render as a bear a little better.That said, I do like what you've done here. I like the "MG" in the ears...it doesn't seem too forced to me, which is good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtrip Posted May 13, 2011 Share Posted May 13, 2011 So yeah, watching the Grizzlies vs Thunder this past week got me thinking about the Grizzlies identity. I kinda hate their current logo. The bear looks like a robot. The colors on the other hand, I dig. I drew a lot of inspiration from the old Vancouver/Early Memphis look, but added my own touches to simplify the face. The colors are the current blues and yellow but tweaked a bit. I plan on finishing this up in the coming days, I just wanted a first opinion. Plus, it kinda looks like Z-Bo.I can't help but think the Hulk meets the Berenstein bears. But I like where you're headed and like that it references the original Vancouver Grizzlies logo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaha32 Posted May 13, 2011 Share Posted May 13, 2011 Maybe its just me, but the first thing I thought of when I saw it was a gorilla, or a monkey of some sort.I would sharpen the teeth, and fix the tongue. I also think your outline is very thick.I was thinking the same thing....I immediately saw "gorilla" on this one. I think if you gave more depth to the snout/muzzle area, it'll render as a bear a little better.That said, I do like what you've done here. I like the "MG" in the ears...it doesn't seem too forced to me, which is good.I originally saw a gorilla too but decided not to mention it since I thought my eyes were just playing a trick on me. I wonder if it's in the teeth because they are rounded and not sharp, or something else..I would not drop the MG ears as elliot said. It's so subtle and the letter style reminds me of the old Vancouver Grizzlies font which I say is a plus, and besides, we've all seen a million logos with typical ears so why not change it up here. Im also dont think white highlights would add anything like was suggested. It will just clutter up the fur. DesignsByHahn.com Behance Dribbble Instragram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrad. Posted May 13, 2011 Share Posted May 13, 2011 So yeah, watching the Grizzlies vs Thunder this past week got me thinking about the Grizzlies identity. I kinda hate their current logo. The bear looks like a robot. The colors on the other hand, I dig. I drew a lot of inspiration from the old Vancouver/Early Memphis look, but added my own touches to simplify the face. The colors are the current blues and yellow but tweaked a bit. I plan on finishing this up in the coming days, I just wanted a first opinion. Plus, it kinda looks like Z-Bo.I can't help but think the Hulk meets the Berenstein bears. But I like where you're headed and like that it references the original Vancouver Grizzlies logo.EXACTLY what i saw when I first looked at it, lol. Hadn't noticed the M & G before...nice touch. Red Goat Creations :: Graphic Design Solutions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gyoung08 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 I am a big fan of their new logo, and I am with the people who said it looked like a monkey or gorilla. Part of me thinks it is the placement of the ears. What if you moved them more toward the top of the head. I would need to look at a picture of a real bear, but I think it is the ears that original made me think of gorilla. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDC Posted May 14, 2011 Author Share Posted May 14, 2011 Updated it a bit, what do you guys think?I played with the muzzle a bit, hopefully getting rid of the Berenstein Bears look. Sharpened the teeth, and touched up the tongue. Also, fiddled with the colors a bit more. Better? worse? ---Owner of the NHA's Philadelphia Quakers, the UBA's Chicago Skyliners, and the CFA's Portland Beavers (2010 CFA2 Champions)--- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.