LetsGoOakland9 Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Who do you believe is the greatest baseball player of all time and why? I didn't put this in the polls section because I didn't want to limit the options or end up with the "other" option winning by a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC2 Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Ted Williams or Lou Gherig. Fast. Hard. Finish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmoehrin Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Just my personal top ten.1. Babe Ruth2. Walter Johnson3. Ty Cobb4. Honus Wagner5. Stan Musial6. Barry Bonds7. Warren Spahn8. Greg Maddux9. Ted Williams10. Rogers HornsbyOther then maybe Jackie Robinson nobody else changed the game more then Babe Ruth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Signals Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Honus WagnerorSandy Koufax Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 I divide it between hitters and pitchers1. Babe Ruth2. Ty Cobb3. Willie Mays4. Lou Gehrig5. Joe DiMaggio6. Ted Williams7. Barry Bonds8. Rickey Henderson9. Honus Wagner10. Mickey Mantle1. Walter Johnson2. Sandy Koufax3. Satchel Paige4. Tom Seaver5. Greg Maddux6. Whitey Ford7. Roger Clemens8. Cy Young9. Mariano Rivera10. Warren Spahn www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Offense: Hank Aaron. 755 home runs. 2,297 RBI (the most ever). 1,477 extra-base hits (the most ever). Third-most career hits in MLB history. Fourth-most runs in MLB history, tied with Babe Ruth. You can't really argue with his resume.Defense/Pitching: Christy Mathewson. Easily the best pitcher of all time in my opinion. He led the league in ERA five times in seventeen years, pitched three shutouts in six days to lead the Giants to a World Series victory in 1905, 5th all-time in ERA, and for those who still think wins mean anything when judging a pitcher, he won 373 games. He was so good, he played in semi-pro leagues at 14 years old. He also invented the screwball. He racked up most of these accomplishments while also playing in the NFL and putting his body at risk. POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infrared41 Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Interesting topic. Let me preface this by saying that I'm not trying to start a debate or flame war or anything. I'm simply stating my opinion. You could make a good argument for quite a few players. That said, you can also argue against some seemingly obvious choices. For instance...Babe Ruth: Great pitcher who moved to the outfield and hit .347 for his career with 714 home runs. So what's the knock on Babe Ruth you might ask. Well, he played in a segregated league so he wasn't facing the the best of the best. He played against the best white players. People who saw both of them play claim that Josh Gibson was every bit as good a hitter as Ruth was. To be fair though (in an admittedly strange use of the word "fair"), Josh Gibson also played in a league that didn't include the best of the best. Based on that, I'd make the argument that MLB wasn't fully integrated (meaning race did not matter, period) until maybe as late as the mid 70's. The color line was broken in 1947 but there was still a good amount of discrimination going on well after Jackie Robinson. In the 50's and part of the 60's, the unwritten rule was that you didn't start more black players than white. The number of black pitchers, catchers, and even middle infielders was pretty low well into the 60's. For a long time after 1947 a black player had to be "star quality" to even make the big league team. With that in mind, I think a discussion of the "all-time best" is better served if we look at it by eras. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmoehrin Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 I divide it between hitters and pitchersI used to do that, but I think I've found a way of accurately compairing the two while being fair to both, but I do get the rationale behind it. If I had to divide them this is how I would go.Hitters1. Babe Ruth2. Ty Cobb3. Honus Wagner4. Stan Musial5. Barry Bonds6. Ted Williams7. Rogers Hornsby8. Tris Speaker9. Eddie Collins10. Willie Mays11. Hank Aaron12. Napoleon Lajoie13. Mickey Mantle14. Charlie Gehringer15. Pete Rose16. Lou Gehrig17. Yogi Berra18. Eddie Mathews19. Mike Schmidt20. Joe MorganPitchers1. Walter Johnson2. Warren Spahn3. Greg Maddux4. Roger Clemens5. Nolan Ryan6. Grover Cleveland Alexander7. Randy Johnson8. Robin Roberts9. Tom Seaver10. Steve Carlton11. Bob Feller12. Christy Mathewson13. Lefty Grove14. Gaylord Perry15. Don Sutton16. Red Ruffing17. Pedro Martinez18. Early Wynn19. Bob Gibson20. Carl HubbellAs far as the Negro League argument is concerned, I have to throw them out based on the idea that if you asked me how great Satchel Paige was, I couldn't give you an honest answer. Obviously the guy would almost certainly be amazing. He was pitching in the majors in his mid 40's and doing okay. Josh Gibson is another.It just sucks that I feel like I have to do that, because it isn't fair, but I also can't evaluate guys based on what ifs which is what I would be doing if I were to try and rank them. That isn't fair either. I simply go on what people did in the MLB and that's it. It's not perfect but no system is.The only thing I can come up with that is fair is to say that racism sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knnhrvy16 Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 It's always tough when it comes to these questions because as Infrared said, so many cases can be made for so many players.As best as I can, I'll put together my top ten position players and top ten pitchers:(I expect my top position player to be a less than popular opinion, but it is my true humble opinion. I don't want to start or provoke any flame wars about it )Position Players:1. Ty Cobb2. Hank Aaron3. Babe Ruth4. Willie Mays5. Josh Gibson6. Lou Gehrig7. Ted Williams8. Stan Musial9. Jimmie Foxx10. Roberto ClementeHonorables - Honus Wagner, Mickey Mantle, Joe DiMaggio, Pete Rose, Ken Griffey, Jr., Johnny Bench, Hank Greenberg, Eddie MathewsPitchers:1. Walter Johnson2. Sandy Koufax3. Cy Young4. Satchel Paige5. Nolan Ryan6. Roger Clemens7. Christy Mathewson8. Tom Seaver9. Warren Spahn10. Randy JohnsonHonorables - Steve Carlton, Bob Gibson, Bob Feller, Mariano Rivera, Greg Maddux, Juan MarichalShoot, that was really tough. The opinions I express are mine, and mine only. If I am to express them, it is not to say you or anyone else is wrong, and certainly not to say that I am right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElwoodCuse Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Simple, really, it's either Barry Bonds or Babe Ruth, and deciding between the two requires quibbling over eras Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drakonius26 Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 I'd personally go with Hank Aaron, in terms of a non-pitcher baseball player, and go with Nolan Ryan in terms of a pitcher from the modern era. If we're going all-time, then maybe I'll put Babe Ruth over Hank Aaron, and Walter Johnson over Nolan Ryan respectively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintsfan Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 The only correct answer is Ruth. No player has made such an impact on offense and defense (pitching at least) as Ruth. I would give an honourable mention to Willie Mays, for a whole number of reasons. Again his divide between offense and defense (out fielding this time!) is a big thing, but his historical impact as the second really major African American star, and his longevity. And Ted Williams deserves a mention for his divide between power and average.One last name that deserves more mention in these lists is Pete Rose. If we are over looking Bonds and the steroid era, we should look beyond Rose's gambling and acknowledge him as the best contact hitter of the 60s and 70s, and one of the most competetive and intense players of all time. 2011/12 WFL Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
north dakota Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Best hitter: Babe RuthBest pitcher: Babe Ruth, would of been the best pitcher ever if he would of kept on pitching. Woah! You think I'm Cody? My name is Carl Scott Simone and we just happen to share a birthday. BIG DEAL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tBBP Posted July 11, 2011 Share Posted July 11, 2011 I'm not a big baseball guy, but I'll be the one to say it: George Herman Ruth, both the player and the legacy, are overrated. There, I said it. I think the main reason people revere the Babe as much as they do is because the man's name has been passed down through generations as if he was the only baseball player that ever existed in his time. (Yeah I went there...shoot me.)It really makes me wish that Ken Griffey Jr. hadn't have been so injury-prone towards the later part of his career. Had the guy stayed healthy, I think he[/] would've done well enough to put himself at the top of the list. Just my own personal two pennies...from a casual baseball observer. *Disclaimer: I am not an authoritative expert on stuff...I just do a lot of reading and research and keep in close connect with a bunch of people who are authoritative experts on stuff. || dribbble || Behance || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HedleyLamarr Posted July 11, 2011 Share Posted July 11, 2011 Keith Lockhart.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slapshot Posted July 11, 2011 Share Posted July 11, 2011 Keith Lockhart....Greatest conductor/second baseman EVAR Back-to-Back Fatal Forty Champion 2015 & 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted July 11, 2011 Share Posted July 11, 2011 I'm saying thIs strictly on what I've seen live and on film, and living where I do I see a LOT of these two players. Much more than others, so consider the source. Willie Mays: from the film I've seen and the stories I've heard there simply was no one better. The epitome and probably the invention of the 5 tool player came with Mays. The guy simply could do it all. Barry Bonds: I know I know, but if there was a player who had a stronger shot at being the next Willy Mays, it was Bonds. He ended up breaking both of the leagues biggest home run records after he started juicing, but the problem is he probably would've gotten relatively close and been able to keep his defensive prowess without taking roids. And even with the steroids issue clouding his later accomplishments, he was the only baseball player I've seen who literally stopped everyone who was watching him every time he came to bat. The guy was phenomenally exciting. Had he not messed around with steroids I think he would've gone down as the greatest player of all time without much of a debate. Bonds is by far the dumbest player in the history of the game for doing what he did. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YessSir32 Posted July 11, 2011 Share Posted July 11, 2011 Ty Cobb. Have you seen that stats? 4,189 hits and .366 career batting average. Detroit Falcons (NABL) | Detroit Gears (UFL) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintsfan Posted July 11, 2011 Share Posted July 11, 2011 I'm not a big baseball guy, but I'll be the one to say it: George Herman Ruth, both the player and the legacy, are overrated. There, I said it. I think the main reason people revere the Babe as much as they do is because the man's name has been passed down through generations as if he was the only baseball player that ever existed in his time. (Yeah I went there...shoot me.)Ruth entirely changed the game, as a hitter, after having been one of the best pitchers of the 1910s. Before Ruth broke out his bat, the game was a contact game, players getting on base and scrambling on the base path. Ruth was the first real for power hitter. He was helped by a couple of rule changes, most notably changing the ball more regularly, so it remained harder and whiter, but even still he was head and shoulders above really anyone else of his generation. Sure he played in the pre integration era, but he also only had a 152 game season, didn't use air travel and had other disadvantages as well. 2011/12 WFL Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pianoknight Posted July 11, 2011 Share Posted July 11, 2011 I'm not a huge baseball junkie, but honestly the first name that EVERYONE thinks of is Babe Ruth. It's just Babe Ruth, period. No need for debate.The only other guy I could consider is Jackie Robinson, if you're playing for a "humanitarian, advancing-the-sport" kind of angle. Breaking the color barrier was bigger than baseball itself. So yeah, the Babe if you're going solely on "baller" status, and Robinson if you're gonna go for the human touch.--EDIT--Remember that the Babe played in an era where your "drug of choice" was actually a detractor from your performance, not an improvement. Forget HGH and steroids, the Babe managed to drink a quart of Jack Daniels, chew a bucket of tobacco and still smash balls over the fence. Hell, if they had invented Camelbacks in those days, you probably wouldda seen BR running the bases while he was swigging down some Wild Turkey. 5th in NAT. TITLES | 2nd in CONF. TITLES | 5th in HEISMAN | 7th in DRAFTS | 8th in ALL-AMER | 7th in WINS | 4th in BOWLS | 1st in SELLOUTS | 1st GAMEDAY SIGN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.