illini1 Posted August 26, 2011 Share Posted August 26, 2011 The wearing them because it's Willie McGee night. Here's a link to a picture of the jerseys:http://t.co/Hn1Rdty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-kj Posted August 26, 2011 Share Posted August 26, 2011 Hooray for Willie!Boo to the 80s jerseys! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted August 26, 2011 Share Posted August 26, 2011 Just out of curiousity, what to the BFIB think about the sacred "birds on a bat" being used on pullover softball jerseys and light blue roads? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted August 26, 2011 Share Posted August 26, 2011 Just out of curiousity, what to the BFIB think about the sacred "birds on a bat" being used on pullover softball jerseys and light blue roads?I've always thought the greatest thing about the Cardinals identity has been its ability to shift and evolve with the times while keeping it's heritage. So the pullover era isn't anything I find embarrassing.I actually thought a perfect illustration of that was the Turn Ahead the Clock uniforms where the birds went robotic and all, but they were still there in the same manner. It kept the tradition, but they were willing to have fun with it, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illini1 Posted August 26, 2011 Author Share Posted August 26, 2011 I think the Cardinals should actually go back to the Stan Musial era uniforms. I would use the current Birds on the Bat logo though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizzaman7294 Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 i like how its the same jersey basically....just a pullover Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjrbaseball Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 I still can't wrap my head around 1985 being a throwback era. I guess I'm getting old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illini1 Posted August 27, 2011 Author Share Posted August 27, 2011 I can't figure out why Majestic makes throwback jerseys baggier than the normal jerseys. It's as if the just walk into a store and pull the jerseys off the rack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illini1 Posted August 27, 2011 Author Share Posted August 27, 2011 i like how its the same jersey basically....just a pulloverYeah it's just like the jersey they wear now. The only differences are it's a pullover, it has striping around the neck & sleeves and the Birds on the Bat logo is different. (rolls eyes) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hormone Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 I like the pant stripes. I wish they would have stripes or piping on their current ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GriffinM6 Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Awesome uni's. I wish they had worn the road uni's of these. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Just out of curiousity, what to the BFIB think about the sacred "birds on a bat" being used on pullover softball jerseys and light blue roads?I've always thought the greatest thing about the Cardinals identity has been its ability to shift and evolve with the times while keeping it's heritage. So the pullover era isn't anything I find embarrassing.I actually thought a perfect illustration of that was the Turn Ahead the Clock uniforms where the birds went robotic and all, but they were still there in the same manner. It kept the tradition, but they were willing to have fun with it, too.I'm sort of with you on the TATC jerseys, but if you think about it, why would there ever be robotic birds, even in the future? Still was a cool concept though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongoose Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Maybe it's because I'm used to seeing pullover jerseys worn tight, but it seems that when majestic makes pullover throwbacks they actually make them baggier than normal jerseys. I'm not saying that all players should be forced to wear tight jerseys when wearing pullover throwbacks, because there will almost certainly be players who will object, but I think a happy medium between baggy and tight would be great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizzaman7294 Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Maybe it's because I'm used to seeing pullover jerseys worn tight, but it seems that when majestic makes pullover throwbacks they actually make them baggier than normal jerseys. I'm not saying that all players should be forced to wear tight jerseys when wearing pullover throwbacks, because there will almost certainly be players who will object, but I think a happy medium between baggy and tight would be great.in other words, just like on a normal gameday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddball Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 It's one thing for Majestic to make baggy uniforms, it's another thing to consistently on the pullovers put the name/wordmark too low on the jersey and to get the sleeve striping thickness wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bouj Posted August 28, 2011 Share Posted August 28, 2011 Majestic makes the throwback pullovers one size bigger than the normal button-ups. Can't say why, but they do. I've seen the pullovers in person in multiple cases and they are always one size too big from their label.Strangely, the Jays powder throwbacks that were worn regularly the last few seasons were sized correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scraw28 Posted August 28, 2011 Share Posted August 28, 2011 they are rolling like the tarp machine to vince coleman (lol) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the admiral Posted August 28, 2011 Share Posted August 28, 2011 It would've been nice if the Cardinals had never gone to pullovers, but remember that they played in an astroturfed concrete donut when they worse them. They were, like STL Fanatic said, staying with the times. I mean, pretty much everyone but the Dodgers and Yankees went to pullovers. Seemed like a good idea at the time. How were they supposed to know all three of those trends would be collectively barfed out of baseball by the early '90s? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted August 28, 2011 Share Posted August 28, 2011 It would've been nice if the Cardinals had never gone to pullovers, but remember that they played in an astroturfed concrete donut when they worse them. They were, like STL Fanatic said, staying with the times. I mean, pretty much everyone but the Dodgers and Yankees went to pullovers. Seemed like a good idea at the time. How were they supposed to know all three of those trends would be collectively barfed out of baseball by the early '90s?Phillies never went to pullovers, though they did make radical changes for their move to their concrete octorad. Can't think of any other artifical turf cookie cutter stadium team that didn't, unless Olympic Stadium in MTL counts as one of the cookie cutters.Padres didn't, but their park at least had traditional grass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCall Posted August 29, 2011 Share Posted August 29, 2011 It would've been nice if the Cardinals had never gone to pullovers, but remember that they played in an astroturfed concrete donut when they worse them. They were, like STL Fanatic said, staying with the times. I mean, pretty much everyone but the Dodgers and Yankees went to pullovers. Seemed like a good idea at the time. How were they supposed to know all three of those trends would be collectively barfed out of baseball by the early '90s?Phillies never went to pullovers, though they did make radical changes for their move to their concrete octorad. Can't think of any other artifical turf cookie cutter stadium team that didn't, unless Olympic Stadium in MTL counts as one of the cookie cutters.Padres didn't, but their park at least had traditional grass.Padres had pullovers. Or did you mean something else? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.