BrandMooreArt Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 WSU151, JQK, and Pizzaman, you're all fired from logos! LOL GRAPHIC ARTIST BEHANCE / MEDIUM / DRIBBBLE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC in Da House w/o a Doubt Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 Kinda looks like a logo you'd see on Madden when creating your own team... I prefer what they went with. Talented stuff though still, truly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davidson Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 Ill take all the 'its not my bag'/ 'I dont like it' comments you like, I completely understand you cannot please all the people etc. But I do not make Madden knockoff logos!And whatever you think about the new logo, the original Panthers logo is technically better for many reasons. Its bland and a bit flat, but the curves are drawn properly and there are no scrag ends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBeastie Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 I like your first update of the update a bit better. It had just the right amount of extra detail without being too much for an NFL team, and I think you did the eyes & brow perfect on that one. This is great work as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gr3g3 Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 Just trying to ripoff the teal tongue just with sliver uh huh lol ! Anyways didn't if anyone noticed the Seahawks official twitter page ? Or if I'm late to the party.What about their twitter page? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quillz Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 I think people rag on Nike because they don't make designs that stand the test of time. "Modern" looks really, really stupid after a year.I disagree. It really depends on the overall look.I think the Denver Broncos 1997 logo package could be classified as "modern," yet I don't think it looks dated. It's a very solid logo, imo. The same with the new Blue Jays logo: a modern take on their classic logo that can easily stand without change for the next couple decades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 Ill take all the 'its not my bag'/ 'I dont like it' comments you like, I completely understand you cannot please all the people etc. But I do not make Madden knockoff logos!And whatever you think about the new logo, the original Panthers logo is technically better for many reasons. Its bland and a bit flat, but the curves are drawn properly and there are no scrag ends.Visually it looks fine from a technical standpoint, but the vectors of the original logo are a mess. The lack of craftsmanship in the new logo is dreadful, though. I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fixer Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 Ill take all the 'its not my bag'/ 'I dont like it' comments you like, I completely understand you cannot please all the people etc. But I do not make Madden knockoff logos!And whatever you think about the new logo, the original Panthers logo is technically better for many reasons. Its bland and a bit flat, but the curves are drawn properly and there are no scrag ends.Visually it looks fine from a technical standpoint, but the vectors of the original logo are a mess. The lack of craftsmanship in the new logo is dreadful, though.hate to add a generic "this^" statement...but this^ is dead on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quillz Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 At times I hate the old logo, and times I like it. I do think this isn't as solid a modernization as some other recent efforts have been (Falcons, Cardinals, Blue Jays, etc.) but I still think the new one, overall, looks better than the old one. I wonder how much compromise came from retaining the same curved look at the bottom, though? That may explain why some of the "scrag" ends are there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CS85 Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 I think people rag on Nike because they don't make designs that stand the test of time. "Modern" looks really, really stupid after a year.I disagree. It really depends on the overall look.I think the Denver Broncos 1997 logo package could be classified as "modern," yet I don't think it looks dated. It's a very solid logo, imo. The same with the new Blue Jays logo: a modern take on their classic logo that can easily stand without change for the next couple decades.I should probably have specified my interpretation of 'modern.' The 97 Broncos update to me was great, it featured modern qualities but wasn't overdone with the present-day accoutrement that's become prototypical of pro-combat-esque redesigns (re: piping, gradients, patterns, scoops, matte, etc.). Quote "You are nothing more than a small cancer on this message board. You are not entertaining, you are a complete joke." twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chawls Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 Here is what I would have done:...and I would have considered this a downgrade. Too much electric blue. Lack of whiskers. Eyes are too small. Honestly people, I know what we're all here for. But the nitpicking on the new logo is quasi-rediculous. It has its minute (pronounced mi-newt) flaws, sure, but it's still an upgrade compared to the former logo. Quote If you hadn't noticed, Chawls loves his wrestling, whether it be real life or sim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phutmasterflex Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 I really am so confused with the script. I liked the Purple Rain script because it had that 90s feel to it and I still like to associate that team with that period Go A's! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pheer Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Just showed the logo to my dad, who's not a logo nut and in his 60's... He said he felt the Panther was "beefier", and I tend to agree. I think there's a lot of picking nits going on... It's never been one of my favorite NFL logos, but I'd consider it a SLIGHT upgrade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quillz Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 I'd like to see how this logo looks embroidered on caps. Any pics of that yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandMooreArt Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Here is what I would have done:...and I would have considered this a downgrade. Too much electric blue. Lack of whiskers. Eyes are too small. Honestly people, I know what we're all here for. But the nitpicking on the new logo is quasi-rediculous. It has its minute (pronounced mi-newt) flaws, sure, but it's still an upgrade compared to the former logo.the flaws are painfully obvious and infuriating to those who care enough to notice. They are signs of an amateur designer. i can tell you even while i was in school, if someone made this as a project they would get a pat on the back for a nice run. then torn apart for its poor craftsmanship. the tangents and poor paths/vector shapes are month 3 stuff. its those things that separates those youngins from the professional talents of Fraser, Kris Bazen, joe Bosack, Marc Verlander, Von Glitschka, etc. its one thing for an NFL team to have a poor concept but theres no excuse for an NFL team to have a poorly crafted logo with a ton of tangents and bad pen tool use.even if Fraser has missed on the overall tone of voice for a professional sports logo (more suited to NCAA?) he certainly has not missed of craftsmanship and proper perspective. but like i said, if it were up to me the logo above would be the new mark. not even close GRAPHIC ARTIST BEHANCE / MEDIUM / DRIBBBLE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk36 Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Here is what I would have done:Great rendering. But, brings to mind something that's long bugged me. Can't a helmet snap be created in such a way that it doesn't cover up parts of the logo on the helmet? There must be a way around this. Design Hovie Studios Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgthree Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 ...and I would have considered this a downgrade. Too much electric blue. Lack of whiskers. Eyes are too small. Honestly people, I know what we're all here for. But the nitpicking on the new logo is quasi-rediculous. It has its minute (pronounced mi-newt) flaws, sure, but it's still an upgrade compared to the former logo.pronouncing words correctly is important, but so is spelling them; especially when you are "teaching." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowld Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 just my opinion but I prefer the real logo compared to the mock up made by Davidson.I love Davidson's work but am not feeling this panther logo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EJ_Barlik Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Just trying to ripoff the teal tongue just with sliver uh huh lol ! Anyways didn't if anyone noticed the Seahawks official twitter page ? Or if I'm late to the party.Just checked it out, actually the Jags tongue is awesome. Never gave it a proper look before.Theirs is one of the best modern logo in the NFL. Up there with the Seahawks.Megadittos! Brilliant observation, if I do say so myself. 5-time Defending NL East Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powersurge Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 I have to say that even though the new logo has its flaws the old logo seems so much more flawed now then ever before. I've let the new logo sink in over the past 24 hours and I honestly can never look at the old logo the same again. I never realized how cartoony it seemed. All in all I think this was a long overdue move for the Panthers. I hope that whatever changes they make to the uniforms don't follow along the path of what the Jaguars did. A few minor tweaks are in order as opposed to some huge overhaul IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.